How about a 80% lower with completed upper?
Call it the modern prepper
alberta tactical rifle:
What Month/Year did you first request a classification decision (FRT #) from the RCMP about the Modern Sporter?
Mostly I'm curious of if it'll end up being more than 1 year between request and decision.
The 80% lower would be prohibited by 1 of their latest rethinkings of the C.C.
What would be worst case scenario,for ATRS, if these are released early?
Worst case for me is they go restricted,and I’m willing to live with that.
I spent an hour on the phone today with Ed Burlew on this very topic.
His opinion is that to the individual, the ramifications should not be much more than having to have the rifle registered, so not a big deal.
The exposure we have is potential retributive persecution. The feds seem to think nothing of laying a bunch of charges, suspending a FBL while the courts sort things out. Defending ourselves against litigation would be expensive, having our FBL revoked or suspended would kill the company. Although the FRT is not law and despite the fact that this is a direct descendant of the MV, so by rights should be NR, do we take the all or nothing gamble that could end ATRS permanently?
Welcome to the Police State of canada
I spent an hour on the phone today with Ed Burlew on this very topic.
His opinion is that to the individual, the ramifications should not be much more than having to have the rifle registered, so not a big deal.
The exposure we have is potential retributive persecution. The feds seem to think nothing of laying a bunch of charges, suspending a FBL while the courts sort things out. Defending ourselves against litigation would be expensive, having our FBL revoked or suspended would kill the company. Although the FRT is not law and despite the fact that this is a direct descendant of the MV, so by rights should be NR, do we take the all or nothing gamble that could end ATRS permanently?
Welcome to the Police State of canada
This looks like the non-AR-AR to buy.
I spent an hour on the phone today with Ed Burlew on this very topic.
His opinion is that to the individual, the ramifications should not be much more than having to have the rifle registered, so not a big deal.
The exposure we have is potential retributive persecution. The feds seem to think nothing of laying a bunch of charges, suspending a FBL while the courts sort things out. Defending ourselves against litigation would be expensive, having our FBL revoked or suspended would kill the company. Although the FRT is not law and despite the fact that this is a direct descendant of the MV, so by rights should be NR, do we take the all or nothing gamble that could end ATRS permanently?
Welcome to the Police State of canada