Fun Gun: FX-9 vs WK180-c, which to pre-order!

My JR does groups just under a loonie at 50 yards. I'm really curious for info on the FX-9 accuracy, but all I see are videos on youtube with shorter barrels and obviously larger groups because of that. Can anyone find anything on this?
 
My JR does groups just under a loonie at 50 yards. I'm really curious for info on the FX-9 accuracy, but all I see are videos on youtube with shorter barrels and obviously larger groups because of that. Can anyone find anything on this?

Those are sweet one round groups :p

A longer barrel has nothing to do with group size. Shorter barrels are actually typically more accurate if the barrel quality and profile are the same. A longer barrel only means higher velocity which translates into flatter trajectories at distance.

Group sizes will depend on if you get lucky and find a round your barrel likes and how skilled the person behind the trigger is.
Buy one and do a nice comparison range report for us.
 
Those are sweet one round groups :p

Yes, I was expecting a raised eyebrow or two. I never expected that accuracy myself out of the JR. Terrible rifle for field stripping IMO, but this gives it a pass in my books.

So I managed to find a screen shot of some guys and gals doing an accuracy test on the FX-9. The below screen shot is of two 50 yard groupings.
These are only my observations from a youtube video. For all I know these three shooters could be the worst shooters on the planet. I am not jumping to any conclusions I just want that to be clear. I am on a pre-order for the FX-9 so there's no turning back for me. But at first glance, my stomach turned a little...

These groups were consistent with 3 different shooters all using a rest similar to the Caldwell Lead sled. And Nosler 9mm.
2yk0128.png


JR Carbine grouping:

Here's a shot of my 5 round grouping with 124 gr CCI Blazer. (115 gr blazer opened up noticeably with no two shots touching. Winchester white box 115 gr a little bit tighter, and shot 3 inches higher. ) 124 gr seems to be the gold standard on minen I'll try some 147 gr sometimes if I can get my hands on some.
rtjki0.jpg
 
Yes, I was expecting a raised eyebrow or two. I never expected that accuracy myself out of the JR. Terrible rifle for field stripping IMO, but this gives it a pass in my books.

JR Carbine grouping:

Here's a shot of my 5 round grouping with 124 gr CCI Blazer. (115 gr blazer opened up noticeably with no two shots touching. Winchester white box 115 gr a little bit tighter, and shot 3 inches higher. ) 124 gr seems to be the gold standard on minen I'll try some 147 gr sometimes if I can get my hands on some.
rtjki0.jpg

That's a nice group, like I said, ammo will play a major role.
The only way to find out is to buy one and go to the range with a few different types and see what they do.
I've seen huge differences from different ammo in the same rifle, it's also not always the most expensive stuff or the stuff that says match on the box that gives the best results.

I just bought a barely used NR 9mm gen 2 Kriss Vector in FDE for such a good deal I couldn't say no, my PCC desires are met for now so the FX-9 will have to wait till I get bored of the Vector. This is the third one I've owned (a couple gen 1 45's previously), something about the Vector calls to me I guess :p

I'd tell you what I paid for it but you'd probably die of shock and I don't want to be responsible for that.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I was expecting a raised eyebrow or two. I never expected that accuracy myself out of the JR. Terrible rifle for field stripping IMO, but this gives it a pass in my books.

So I managed to find a screen shot of some guys and gals doing an accuracy test on the FX-9. The below screen shot is of two 50 yard groupings.
These are only my observations from a youtube video. For all I know these three shooters could be the worst shooters on the planet. I am not jumping to any conclusions I just want that to be clear. I am on a pre-order for the FX-9 so there's no turning back for me. But at first glance, my stomach turned a little...

These groups were consistent with 3 different shooters all using a rest similar to the Caldwell Lead sled. And Nosler 9mm.
2yk0128.png


JR Carbine grouping:

Here's a shot of my 5 round grouping with 124 gr CCI Blazer. (115 gr blazer opened up noticeably with no two shots touching. Winchester white box 115 gr a little bit tighter, and shot 3 inches higher. ) 124 gr seems to be the gold standard on minen I'll try some 147 gr sometimes if I can get my hands on some.
rtjki0.jpg

Yah I've noticed the same! My JR 9mm is a solid 2-3 MOA shooter with all brands of 9mm.... I bought the quick detach buffer kit for my JR, so field stripping isnt so impractical now. Absolutely love the gun and so does everybody else who pulls trigger :D

However I did handle the Canadian FX9 at a gun show and I must say WOW does it fit, feel and point nice! But if it honestly gets groups like what u posted, I'll say no thanks haha.
 
My key concern between getting a PCC versus a .223 rifle is how potentially limiting a PCC is versus .223. In a sense, is it really worth getting a PCC if a semi-auto .223 can do everything it does but better (except for general ammo cost)? I know many would recommend getting both, but my budget is rather limited nowadays.
 
My key concern between getting a PCC versus a .223 rifle is how potentially limiting a PCC is versus .223. In a sense, is it really worth getting a PCC if a semi-auto .223 can do everything it does but better (except for general ammo cost)? I know many would recommend getting both, but my budget is rather limited nowadays.

Wat 9mm does better than .223....

Less noise pollution
Less concussion
More compact
Able to carry more ammo on person
Cheaper hunting ammo
No over penitration
Stray bullets and ricochets don't travel as far
Higher firearm lifespan
Less intimidating to new shooters
More likely to be allowed on range steel at gun clubs
Shares mags and ammo with certain pistols

I'm sure there's more. But honestly, u best buy BOTH lol
 
Last edited:
Wat 9mm does better than .223....

Less noise pollution
Less concussion
More compact
Able to carry more ammo on person
Cheaper hunting ammo
No over penitration
Stray bullets and ricochets don't travel as far
Higher firearm lifespan
Less intimidating to new shooters
More likely to be allowed on range steel at gun clubs
Shares mags and ammo with certain pistols

I'm sure there's more. But honestly, u best buy BOTH lol

hmm those are valid points to consider, thanks for the input
you can hunt with 9mm??
 
My key concern between getting a PCC versus a .223 rifle is how potentially limiting a PCC is versus .223. In a sense, is it really worth getting a PCC if a semi-auto .223 can do everything it does but better (except for general ammo cost)? I know many would recommend getting both, but my budget is rather limited nowadays.

It all depends what you want to do with it. If you're just making holes in paper at the range the only consideration you really need is ammo cost but if you're planning to hunt or shoot further than 150 yards then caliber selection is more important. Only you can decide which one is best for you.
If you're on a budget I'd go with the 9mm just because it will allow you to shoot more for the same money spent on ammo and it's typically allowed on every range you'll go to. It's also quieter than 223 so when you're on crown or private land you'll need to worry less about annoying the neighbors.
 
hmm those are valid points to consider, thanks for the input
you can hunt with 9mm??

I certainly do. Not for deer tho... Although I did shoot a deer with it last season due to a series of unfortunate events. One bullet to the side of the head 50meters distance and the deer dropped.

I use mine for small game.... Gophers, rabbits, beavers, porcupines, badgers and coyotes. Does great for those out to 100m.
 
Back
Top Bottom