Spike in human-caused grizzly bear deaths spurs call for immediate action

BigUglyMan

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
28   0   0
Location
New Scotland
I thought this belonged here since the implication is that restricting access to "bear country" will reduce the numbers of bears killed. Also find their quoted number of 57 "poaching" deaths are concerning given the difficulty in ascertaining an accurate number. I'm not familiar with the AWA and their feelings toward hunting (I did download and read their position paper on Hunting Trapping and Fishing, but it is intentionally vague) but this is something that bears monitoring (pun not intended).

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-grizzly-bear-deaths-1.4646934

Spike in human-caused grizzly bear deaths spurs call for immediate action

Over the past decade, 207 grizzlies have suffered human-caused deaths

The Alberta Wilderness Association wants immediate action to stop human-caused grizzly bear deaths in the province.

According to statistics released by the provincial government, there have been 207 grizzly deaths caused by humans since 2008. The highest number in one year during that period was 29.

"Twenty-nine bears killed in 2016 is an incredibly concerning number. It's way over the average of 19 bears a year," said the association's Joanna Skrajny, a conservation specialist.

"To me, what's also concerning is that three of the last five years have had numbers that are way over that. We had 26 caused-by-people deaths in 2013, 27 in 2014 and 29 in 2016, so it's a worrying trend, for sure."

Skrajny says the numbers are estimates and the actual number of deaths could be much higher.

"For example, for the number of poaching deaths — poachers aren't going to phone in and say 'hello, yes, I have killed a bear, so please mark that down.' So the number could be twice as high, that's generally what researchers such as Gordon Stenhouse have estimated."

Known poaching incidents — illegal kills — account for 57 of the total deaths.

Skrajny says there is an action plan in place that was created in 2008 to protect Alberta's grizzlies, but it needs to be implemented.

A big part of that, she says, is reducing the number of roads in bear habitat and ensuring there aren't as many built going forward.

She says that would help reduce access for poachers and protect habitat for the grizzlies.

Ensuring there are fewer roads could involve industries working together.

"There shouldn't be an oil road right next to a forestry road, right next to another road. We can combine those together and just use one road for all three of those," said Skrajny.
 
Aside from the politics/agenda of restricting access, it's more than likely that the increase is the result of an increasing bear population.
 
x2, this will be happening in BC next, now that there is no more grizzly hunting thanks to the f******* NDP scum...

Grizzly are the alpha predator, the only thing they fear is humans. That fear will be gone in a bear generation. Result will be more attacks and dead bears.

They will also will have no economic value, disposed of like a BIC lighter. Further, trophy hunting takes large past their breeding prime boars, the same bears that kill cubs.

Cancelling the hunt will result in less bears, not more.
 
Aside from the politics/agenda of restricting access, it's more than likely that the increase is the result of an increasing bear population.

Bingo. Bear encounters are now almost unavoidable for anyone using the outdoors, including areas with previously very low numbers.
 
Back
Top Bottom