Mag Compatabilty: Turkish Semi Auto Shotguns

Boomer686

Northern Mod
Moderator
Rating - 100%
550   0   0
Location
The Big Land
So what's the word on all the Turkish semi's out there now and the compatibility of their mags? Can mags from the Derya, Typhoon and Alpha Arms be shared?

Some of the mags are seemingly better quality and some of these manufacturers offer two rounders suitable for hunting as opposed to modding existing five rounders.
 
I have darya mags for my darya mk10, i have two 5rounders and one 2 rounder. They work really well and build well. Im curious about what mags fit what. I have heared some pump mags fit some of the semi guns. But darya isnt one if them. I believe its the uzkon mags that do. So that leads me to believe there is two types of mags for all of these turkish shotguns. It seems there is very few designs and all compaines just malking the same gun with different stocks.
 
I bought a mag from a pump gun that fits my 1919 match but can't remember what pump gun off hand, maybe uzkon 46?

Yes the as46 mag fits the 1919.... it doesn't fit the mk12 though.
I had the 1919 but upgraded to the mk12.
I saved a few mags from my 1919 but the as46 mag was way too tight, And the 1919 mags were too sloppy.
 
Yes the as46 mag fits the 1919.... it doesn't fit the mk12 though.
I had the 1919 but upgraded to the mk12.
I saved a few mags from my 1919 but the as46 mag was way too tight, And the 1919 mags were too sloppy.

This is what I am looking at as well: selling the Alpha Arms and getting a mk12; I have 8 mags for the 1919 so ........ what about the uzkons? Anyone know what the compatibility is there?
 
Bullseye in London Ont, claimed that Derya MK12 mags fit and cycle in the Axor. I bought 2 mags and they will fit but jam up. They are not reliable & bottom line will not work. I called & told them. So I’ll have two MK12 mags for sale!!!
 
the uzkon "pattern mags" do fit the 1919; makes for an interesting interpretations of "orignially designed for". If you look closely the 1919 mags have a tilted follower and somehow enable the bolt hold open feature of the 1919. the uzkon mags have a flat follower and though they feed fine there is no hold open. Much like the IAI 10 round mags that function in the m305/ M1a.
When I got my 1919 (and AS-46) they 10 rounders were abundant, they have since dried up.
 
Buddy and I went out one day with his Derya MK12 and my Typhoon F12 . We found his mags would not run in my Typhoon but my mags would run in his Derya.
 
A friend of mine is a small gun business and he deals with a lot of these Turkish guns. Many of the mags will interchange but the followers are different. Dunno if that was done on purpose for the Canadian market so we can have higher capacity mags for the pump guns vs semis or not, but it works for our purposes.
 
I burned through a pile of $$ playing around with this a few years ago when the Turkish mag feds first came out, have a semi-auto mag fed, and a pump mag fed, and a pile of mags from different vendors:

asena_4joka.jpg


1.jpg


Here's the "executive summary" of what I've figured out over the past few years:

The pumps all use the same pattern magazine. If the magazine is listed to fit the "AS-46" pumps (which were the first of them to come to market, IIRC), then you should be good to go.

The semi-autos use a slightly different magazine. It has a cutout on the rear of the magazine that allows a tab to pop-out after the last round is fired, activating the bolt hold open. This feature is lacking on the magazines designed for the pump guns.

The magazines are otherwise cross-compatible. If you use a magazine designed for the pump guns in the semis, the will fit, latch into place, and feed, and vice versa (caveats below).

Caveats:

No1: Magazines
People keep stating that the feed angle is different between the two. This is not the case. There are several different manufacturers of the mags, from what I've gleaned from looking at the mags - 3 different manufacturers, that I've spotted, so far. The differences in the feed lips and ramp angle of the follower, is dependent on the manufacturer, not whether it was designed for a semi or pump. The key problem I've had here is that the packaging they come in is based on what the importer requests (and there are a bunch of people importing the mags), or simply a plain plastic bag with no labeling at all. The packaging won't tell you which of the three flavours (possibly more) you bought. Which ones are going to feed better in your gun depends on... Which gun you bought. Not which manufacturer you got it from, which brand, which model, etc... The actual gun you have in your hands.

No2: Semi-Autos
The Turk semi-auto mag feds are not reliable. They aren't ready for prime time. I'm going to take a lot of heat for saying that, and the facks I give are exactly zero. I own one, and have had several others as loaners, and have personally run close to 2K rounds through them. I have never once managed to get a 100 round string through any of them, regardless of mag or ammo. I'll get a string going and think "Ok, these mags and this ammo..." and then a couple mags later... Jam City. Guys show up at 3 gun matches with high dollar mag fed semis, talk them up a storm about how well they work... And somewhere during the match... Jam City. I've never witnessed one of them make it all the way through a match, and chatting up the guys from other squads in the match, they see the same thing. This reliability is completely independent of whether the mags were designed for the semis or the pumps.

When someone posts an un-edited video of one of these things going through a minimum of 200 round string without failure, I will believe otherwise. Until then, I won't.

No3: The Outlier Semi-Auto
There was (and possibly still is) one of the mag fed semi-autos that does not accept the standard mags. This came about because of some shenanigans between CBSA, the RCMP, and the Importer. I can't remember the exact make/model, but there was a thread from the importer at the time about there being a delay bringing the guns to market while they modified the mag catch to meet compliance requirements. Why the Horse Police and the CBSA got their knickers in a knot about this one brand of guns, I'm not going to offer an opinion - the only info I have is "I heard from a guy who talked to a guy who knew a guy..." and the story was... All kinds of fishy. I can't find that thread, and I suspect it might have gotten deleted. Sorry I'm not being more specific, but without a specific thread to point at, I'm not going to risk going pink by saying something about an importer or wholesaler I can't directly back up.

No4: The Turkish Shotgun Scene is WAY more complex than you think
It's comparable to the American AR scene. The label you see on the side of it, features, design, layout, are essentially completely independent of who actually made it. There are a couple very big manufacturing concerns, who produce guns under their own labels, as well as for big name makers such as Weatherby, as well as an entire phone book worth of mid sized and small manufacturers who make and label guns on contract, or under their own brand names. And aftermarket parts and accessory makers. There is a large degree of cross pollination between the manufacturers, because they all base their guns off the same patterns (the Turks have an even fuzzier concept of "patent" and "copyright" than the Chinese do). The parts (barrels, bolts, furniture, etc.) from different manufacturers are quite often cross-compatible, but not always.

This doesn't mean they're bad guns. I have a bunch of Turk guns in all kinds of flavours (semi, pump, single shot, semi and pump mag fed, over under...) And the majority have been great guns that I'm very happy with. I'm confident enough in my pump mag fed that I'm going to run it in 3-gun this year (I know which mags and ammo it likes, and it just plain works).

But if you're going to drop money on one... Do so with a vendor you trust, who you know has your back if something doesn't work out.

Cheers.
 
grelmar,
Excellent write up, thank you for that. Would you mind sharing which mag and ammo combo that works for your as-46. (I understand this might vary for my as-46)
 
On a side note;

That's an interesting spot for the red-dot on your Model 46.

How is that working for you?

Not well. I prefer to keep my RDS out front, makes for really fast acquisition (I discovered this by accident mucking about with the RDS placement on the handguard rail on my 858). In terms of sight picture, it's awesome. In terms of zero retention, notsomuch. The rail moves around a LOT with the way that polymer heatshield is set up. I've since moved it to the very rear of the rail, which if you notice, is actually attached to a different chunk of polymer that cups over the rear of the receiver, is much more solid and secure, and retains zero.

I would still like to have it mounted out front, and I probably will at some point, but it will require modding the gun to make that chunk of rail more stable.

grelmar,
Excellent write up, thank you for that. Would you mind sharing which mag and ammo combo that works for your as-46. (I understand this might vary for my as-46)

Ammo - anything. It's been very good so far. It even eats the cheap crap with nickle/aluminum bases.

Mags... I'll try and remember to pull them out and take some photos. Truth is, I've bought/traded around mags over the past few years, and have kept poor track of where they all came from. I've also swapped followers between the different mags (easy to do), to finally get to the point where I have 3 of the 10 rounders that work really reliably, and 2 of the 5 rounders that work really reliably.

Come to think of it... A "smart" pic to take would be of the different types of followers I currently have, and which ones work.
 
Ok... Ask, and ye shall receive.

Two series of pics. First series, is the mags that work reliably in my pump (not technically an AS46, but reaistically, an AS46 with a different brand name stamped on it). The second series of pics is the ones that don't work reliably, or jam downright consistently. You can click on any of the pics to get the full sized images for your closer inspection and viewing pleasure. Happy to share this, because while going through the process of photographing them, I made some interesting observations/realized some things, that I hadn't noticed before.

Keep in mind, the magazine/follower/spring combinations are not necessarily as they arrived from purchase. I mixed and matched over the past few years to squeeze the best reliability out of them. I was particularly interested in getting the 10 rounders working right, because these are the most useful for me for 3-gun matches.

These are the mags that work and I trust:












And these are the "shelved" mags that don't work reliably:











So what the heck does this all mean? What did I learn?

#1: There's at least 4 different manufacturers represented here, and probably more.

And I have a strong suspicion that the end products are assembled from a variety of component manufacturers.

Mag Bodies:

The mag bodies themselves can be broken down into two obviously different patterns, and those two patterns can actually be broken down into two subsets each. The two most obvious sets are the "3-stripe" and "5-stripe" bodies. Easy enough to spot by the number of stiffening indents in the sides of the magazines. These can further be divided by "round lip" vs. "straight lip" magazines. Interestingly, both the 5 and 3 stripes pattern have the two different types of feed lip. The "Round Lip" has a slightly shorter shell retention foldover with rounder taper to the front side tapers. The "Straight Lip" has a slightly longer shell retention foldover, with the front sides being straighter along the side, then angling more sharply down. Again, interesting to note, is that in my 10 round mags, while all three are "3-stripe" bodies, two of them are "straight lip" and two of them are "round lip". Also, all of the 5 rounders designed for the semi-autos are straight lip (but both 5 and 3 stripe), and both of the 5 rounders are "Round Lip 5-stripe" (pretty small sample size, and these would have come with my pump gun).

Followers:

Four different kinds of followers here.

For the semi, with the spring loaded tab for the bolt hod open, there's a "box cut" and a "notch cut" - the notch cut ones having an extra cut on the bottom. The notch-cut followers have a flat top and a very steep drop off at the front of the follower. The box-cut followers are dished out at the top, and then rather than dropping off at the front, simply level out for a very short distance.

For the pump followers, there's "U-Top" vs. "Box-Top". All three of my 10 rounders have "U-Top" - but take that with a grain of salt. As I've mentioned, I've been mixing and matching to get reliability, and this is just where I've landed after a couple years. The U-tops have a slight ramp at the rear of the follower, then level out with a dished out channel in the center. The rear ramp is probably a big part of their success, because it likely reduces the chances the rim of a shotgun shell will catch on the follower and hang up. The Box Top are similarlry configured on the top of the follower, although 1 of them is in the "reliable mag" pile, and one of them is in the "dodgy mag" pile. Go figure.

Also of note, one of the semi-auto mags is in the "reliable" pile - it works very well in my pump, and is of the "notch cut" variety. Again, go figure :confused:

Springs:

There are 3 different kinds of spring in use. It'll be impossible to tell from the photos (sorry), but they have 3 distinctly different metals and fabrications to them.

1 type has a black coating, and these are BY FAR the stiffest springs and thickest wire. None of these have ended up in the "reliable mag" pile - they're in Mag #1 and Mag # 2 of the unreliables.

Type 2 and Type 3 we'll call "softer" and "softest." All three of my 10 rounders have the softest kind of metal, just extra coils and longer. It's also in both of my "pump mag" 5 rounders. The one that ended up in the "unreliable" pile has a couple extra coils and is noticeably longer (there's a clue here), and the 3 "semi auto" have medium soft metal, but all are the same length (even in the mag that works :confused: ).

Spring base and Base Plate:

4 distinct type of base plate (you can spot the differences by looking). Don't care. They're all 100% interchangeable without noticeable effect.

3 different kind of spring base. The "finned" spring base (in two of the 10 round mags), where the fin slides inside the coils of the spring. "Retained" spring plate - where there's a small raised circle on the spring side of the plate, that catches into the spring and his held in place. And the "Un-retained" spring plate - perfectly smooth on the spring side. Keep an eye on these, because when you pop off the baseplate, they will get launched across your garage when the srping releases pressure.

The "Finned" style are of note, because they only work in the 10 round mags. The 10 rounders will be limited by the follower hitting a catch inside the mag. In a 5 rounder, the fin will cause the follower to bottom out early and reduce your capacity by 1.

Otherwise, the spring bases are not important.

Conclusions:

It's all about the springs and followers... Mostly. With the right spring tension, and the right follower, you get the best reliability. My 1 "mag fed" 5 round magazine that's been giving me grief, likely just needs a coil or two clipped to reduce tension.

The real outlier, is the 5 rounder for semis that ended up in the reliable pile, but I suspect I know what's going on here. The mag body of this one has a matte, powder coat finish. Every other mag I have has a high gloss finish. And although it seems typical of a "3-stripe" pattern mag, it has a slightly different spine, with a far more precisely stamped groove for the bolt catch tab. The over-insertion dents in the side are also more pronounced. I think this is just an overall better made magazine, that allows for freer movement of the follower, without requiring an overly stiff spring.

The feed angle differences between the "semi" followers and the "pump" followers... Is mostly an optical illusion. When you put the mags side by side, they have the same angle. The semi-auto followers have a drop off at the front, while the pump mag followers have a ramp at the rear to allow the rim of the shell base to clear more easily.

Examining these today as closely as I did, gives me a far better idea of why some of these mags work, while others don't.

A too stiff spring is going to cause you grief. Period.

The followers for the semi-autos need a re-design, to help the shell rim clear.

Buying turk shotgun mags is a whole bag full of caveat emptor. It really does look like they're being assembled from a variety of component manufacturers. Whatever it says on the label of the package, isn't likely to mean much. The people assembling the final products, are likely doing so based on buying components from whichever supplier that has inventory/offers the lowest cost.

Cheers.
 
Back
Top Bottom