If you have a rimfire cartridge that has a spent case of over 32mm then you go right ahead and use it... but you don't. Maybe an antique 44 rimfire has a spent case over 32mm... I've never seen one before, they're too rare to worry about. But something like a 22lr, 22 mag, 17 hmr... none are over 32mm. So it's just semantics to argue that it isn't on rimfire. Because it is on everything with a spent case of less than 32mm and all of the modern rimfires are smaller. So yes, it does ban rimfires from hunting big game.
Minimum caliber for big game change in Saskatchewan
- Thread starter saskgunowner101
- Start date
If you have a rimfire cartridge that has a spent case of over 32mm then you go right ahead and use it... but you don't. Maybe an antique 44 rimfire has a spent case over 32mm... I've never seen one before, they're too rare to worry about. But something like a 22lr, 22 mag, 17 hmr... none are over 32mm. So it's just semantics to argue that it isn't on rimfire. Because it is on everything with a spent case of less than 32mm and all of the modern rimfires are smaller. So yes, it does ban rimfires from hunting big game.
rimfires arent mentioned for upland birds but centrefires are prohibited. it seems like what isnt banned is allowed.
is it just semantics in both cases and 22s are suddenly not allowed for upland? im thinking its an oversight that will be revised in the future
is it just semantics in both cases and 22s are suddenly not allowed for upland? im thinking its an oversight that will be revised in the future
I was just re-reading it and you're right... the spent case cartridge length ban is for centrefire. They have effectively made it legal to hunt everything with a .17 or .22 rimfire from upland birds to moose. This is a piss poor revision done. I emailed the minister of environment and my mla yesterday. My mla stopped by my office and mentioned it today too, so there will probably be some revisions coming. I just hope that they smarten up and allow the 45 colt and 41 magnum again... even the 357 is probably more than adequate if they allow it for whitetail, mulies, and antelope. I can see not allowing 357 for moose, elk, & bear.
saskgunowner101
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- near Prince Albert
There's that wk-180? rifle Wolverine is making too, might sell a few more.
They banned it as a center fire.... I'm not actually aware of a .17 caliber centerfire, just rimfire. That's how poorly worded this legislation is... it's shameful
rifleman762
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Southern Alberta
17 Hornet and 17 Remington.
I was gonna say...
These regs are clearly a mess though. Hope they sort it out... Can't say I fancy caliber restrictions, people hunting should know enough to pick a suitable caliber. If they can't figure that out its time to go to the grocery store.
Edit - if only there was a course people had to take where these sorts of things could be taught to everyone...
Last edited:
- Location
- Somewhere on the Hudson Bay Coast
The trouble with these lists is there is always a chance of missing something, such as the .256 Winchester, which being 32.5 mm long, seems to meet the legal minimum requirement of a big game cartridge, but isn't good for much. All this raises the question of why some hunters believe that a minimalist approach to big game hunting cartridges has any merit whatsoever, but the legislation as presented doesn't resolve this problem. Those with a contrary nature will immediately look for the loopholes, and find a Marlin Levermatic in .256 Winchester to use as their primary moose and black bear rifle. Clearly a .378 Weatherby isn't for everyone, but suggesting a big game cartridge must have a minimum bullet weight of 85 grs, and produces a minimum of 1000 ft-lbs of energy, takes care of those with negative feelings about blast and recoil, while eliminating most of the mouse guns.
17 Fireball
The Saskatchewan Wildlife Federation says the province has changed their position on hunting rights for First Nations and Metis people in the province.
First Nations and Metis people have had unlimited rights to hunt in provincial pastures, but the Wildlife Federation says they have been informed that effective immediately they will only be allowed to hunt during the recognized dates listed in the Hunter’s and Trapper’s Guide.
Anyone wishing to hunt outside of those dates may only do so at the discretion of the pasture manager.
The Wildlife Federation is encouraging anyone with questions to call 306-692-8812.
First Nations and Metis people have had unlimited rights to hunt in provincial pastures, but the Wildlife Federation says they have been informed that effective immediately they will only be allowed to hunt during the recognized dates listed in the Hunter’s and Trapper’s Guide.
Anyone wishing to hunt outside of those dates may only do so at the discretion of the pasture manager.
The Wildlife Federation is encouraging anyone with questions to call 306-692-8812.
There are windmills on prairies down south(Zone 10 has some north of Great Sandhills....no trees for stands? But you could hand a tree stand on a windmill easy enough.
Wildlife lands should be restricted the same.
The indians should be able to hunt on the pfra and wildlife zones and crown land and wherever... WITH A BOW! If they want a rifle, they should be subject to the same rules as everyone else. Buy a tag, enter the draw, and wait for the season. Using a rifle was not their culture... they got the rifle from the Europeans!
