Minimum caliber for big game change in Saskatchewan

The trouble with these lists is there is always a chance of missing something, such as the .256 Winchester, which being 32.5 mm long, seems to meet the legal minimum requirement of a big game cartridge, but isn't good for much. All this raises the question of why some hunters believe that a minimalist approach to big game hunting cartridges has any merit whatsoever, but the legislation as presented doesn't resolve this problem. Those with a contrary nature will immediately look for the loopholes, and find a Marlin Levermatic in .256 Winchester to use as their primary moose and black bear rifle. Clearly a .378 Weatherby isn't for everyone, but suggesting a big game cartridge must have a minimum bullet weight of 85 grs, and produces a minimum of 1000 ft-lbs of energy, takes care of those with negative feelings about blast and recoil, while eliminating most of the mouse guns.

That is a very reasonable big game cartridge standard.
 
That is a very reasonable big game cartridge standard.

At first I agreed with you, but there is always exceptions. For instance, what Boomer suggests would eliminate the 80gr ttsx in a 243 as legal for big game, as well as any 357mag loading, even the stuff from Buffalo bore (180 gr @1400fps is around 800 ft lbs energy) and both are capable of quickly dispatching a deer assuming your range is appropriate for the cartridge.

Giving a minimum weight and energy requirement is probably the most reasonable way to do things (its how they govern what's legal for bison in BC) but even then it's certainly not perfect. For instance a decently hot 308 w/180gr pills meets the requirements, but the 308 is not a particularly good choice for such a large animal. I've seen this discussed by Ardent before, and I think he said 300wm is the absolute minimum he likes a client to shoot when guiding for bison because anything less typically leads to long tracking expeditions after the shot.
 
I don't know where people are hunting with these calibres but I've been hunting since the early 70's and haven't met a single person using one yet....just maybe this řeally isn't a big issue at all??
 
I think that in the end, appropriate cartridge choices requires some common sense and knowledge of the cartridges abilities and limitations. Of course this is problematic because a good many hunters have a limited grasp of ballistics etc. So the authorites try to create regulations to control the use of underpowered cartridges, which is good , albeit done clumsily. Too many variables for any regulation to completely cover all situations. Game animals deserve our respect, and shouldn't be treated as a science experiment, to see if a low powered cartridge can work. We have a list of cartridges that have a proven track record, with power to spare. No reason not to use them. And if the regs rule out a few cartridges that technically possess enough power to harvest game In specific situations, but are none the less at the lower end of the power scale, i think it is the lesser of evils.
 
Just curious- these days, everyone wants to be consulted before changes are made: was there any consultation with hunters before this happened?

While I didn't ask the question, apparently someone did (again, from the fb page) and this is what was said.

"It should be noted that SACO and conservation officers were not consulted and had no input into this amendment."
 
Kind of amused this got moved to the hunting specific forum from general firearms discussion. I thought there might be interest in discussing the caliber changes/restrictions, and the how comes, and all that goes along with it in the general forum.
 
The indians should be able to hunt on the pfra and wildlife zones and crown land and wherever... WITH A BOW! If they want a rifle, they should be subject to the same rules as everyone else. Buy a tag, enter the draw, and wait for the season. Using a rifle was not their culture... they got the rifle from the Europeans!

Not just a bow, a bow they made themselves out of traditional materials. That would be their real tradition and culture.
 
Not just a bow, a bow they made themselves out of traditional materials. That would be their real tradition and culture.

Except even if white man never took over the Americas, international trade means the natives would have guns by now... Some things seem a bit much (such as 50cal rifles for whale hunting as apposed to spears) but I see no issue with the use of standard hunting rifles.
 
At first I agreed with you, but there is always exceptions. For instance, what Boomer suggests would eliminate the 80gr ttsx in a 243 as legal for big game, as well as any 357mag loading, even the stuff from Buffalo bore (180 gr @1400fps is around 800 ft lbs energy) and both are capable of quickly dispatching a deer assuming your range is appropriate for the cartridge.

Giving a minimum weight and energy requirement is probably the most reasonable way to do things (its how they govern what's legal for bison in BC) but even then it's certainly not perfect. For instance a decently hot 308 w/180gr pills meets the requirements, but the 308 is not a particularly good choice for such a large animal. I've seen this discussed by Ardent before, and I think he said 300wm is the absolute minimum he likes a client to shoot when guiding for bison because anything less typically leads to long tracking expeditions after the shot.

Ahh, but the Barnes 6mm TSX is an 85 gr pill, so my recommendation prevents you from making horrible mistake. Seriously though, game animals comes in a variety of densities, and what is appropriate for a speed goat, isn't necessarily appropriate for a big bodied white tail and certainly not appropriate for elk. Unless the game departments are prepared to provide a list of not only appropriate cartridges with the hunting license, but also a list of bullets, they should reconsider this exercise before it gets out of hand.
 
80 gr TTSX, or 85 gr TSX available in .243”....

Both adequate for moose or elk used within their parameters.




Interesting to read the wailing and gnashing of teeth though around the possibility of someone wanting to use a different cartridge when they hunt.
 
Truly. I told my friend I'd hunt White Tail with .223 if it was legal and he lost his mind. Called me dumb and said he doesn't anything to do with such a hunt...lol

Meanwhile Americans have been taking dear succesfully with AR15s for ages. Just do a YouTube search for AR15 deer hunts. But anyway, yeah, I was so surprised by that reaction. And to top it all, he says, even if you dropped them where they stood every time, you would still never convince me. Talk about a bias and a closed mind.
 
pause for thought here gents

during big game season its common for two hunters to go out,one with a deer tag and the other with a varmint cal rifle for yotes.
now this is changed,you get pulled now with a .223 you could be called out by a CO for poaching.

this is fckd up
 
pause for thought here gents

during big game season its common for two hunters to go out,one with a deer tag and the other with a varmint cal rifle for yotes.
now this is changed,you get pulled now with a .223 you could be called out by a CO for poaching.

this is fckd up

It is a violation to:

accompany, hunt with, aid or assist
a person hunting big game while
hunting coyotes or wild boar.


Too slow.
 
I don't know where people are hunting with these calibres but I've been hunting since the early 70's and haven't met a single person using one yet....just maybe this řeally isn't a big issue at all??

This is exactly correct. Solving a problem that doesn’t exist. It’s like Alberta banning spear hunting, or any of the provinces that want minimum .23 caliber for deer.
 
Truly. I told my friend I'd hunt White Tail with .223 if it was legal and he lost his mind. Called me dumb and said he doesn't anything to do with such a hunt...lol

Meanwhile Americans have been taking dear succesfully with AR15s for ages. Just do a YouTube search for AR15 deer hunts. But anyway, yeah, I was so surprised by that reaction. And to top it all, he says, even if you dropped them where they stood every time, you would still never convince me. Talk about a bias and a closed mind.

I hunted Whitetail with a .223 Rem for a couple of years. I wouldn't recommend this calibre. It got the job done but it definitely didn't do it with authority. I wouldn't every give anyone a hard time for using this calibre but it doesn't merit highly on my list of recommended calibres. If the shooter can handle the recoil, noise and cost of a larger calibre, I would recommend almost anything over a .223 Rem.
 
Yup, this is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist. There might be a small handful of guys out there hunting with those calibres in the province. Those who are, are likely pretty well versed on what ethical distance to use it, and its effectiveness. Personally if its done ethically I cant see a problem.
 
I get it Glock4ever. There is definitely a distance limitation and shot placement is crucial. Also you gotta use the right bullet.

Thousands of pages of debates have been typed on the subject.
 
Back
Top Bottom