What can your 6.5 creedmore do that my .260 can't?

Soldier System:

USSOCOM Adopts 6.5 Creedmoor

Last Spring, USSOCOM undertook a study of 6.5 family cartridges to determine a path forward for Precision Intermediate Caliber Ammunition. Over the last year, USASOC, the primary driver of this initiative, narrowed it down to 260 Remington and 6.5 Creemoor. Testing indicated that the two calibers performed very closely.

Last month, the command conducted a reliability test, using two incumbent weapons, currently in US service; the FN SCAR Heavy and KAC M110. Two weapons of each type were used, one was in 260 Remington and the other in 6.5 CM. What they found is that both weapons performed just as well and were just as reliable in either caliber.

As both cartridges were similarly accurate and reliable, the determining factor for selection of 6.5 CM would end up being trade space. The prevailing attitude is that there was more room with the 6.5 CM to further develop projectiles and loads.


Read the rest of the article here:<click me>
 
Last edited:
Not that I have any skin in the game, I don't own any 6.5s but I always get a chuckle out of this one.fa99d7394c0dcf21bd4515fb4085c721.jpg
 

Attachments

  • fa99d7394c0dcf21bd4515fb4085c721.jpg
    fa99d7394c0dcf21bd4515fb4085c721.jpg
    127.8 KB · Views: 364
If I were considering a new 6.5 caliber rifle, I would likely choose both the 6.5 cm and 260 Rem as the lowest preference. Highest preference would go to the 6.5x284 and 6.5 PRC.
Short or long action makes no diff to me.
 
Why would anyone want a creedmoor or the forgotten 260 when they could should the vastly superior and sufficient 6.5x55 swede?
 
I don’t think anyone is stupid enough to say something like that unless he’s trying to get a reaction out of you.

I watched a video in South Africa hunting monkeys. The guy was using a .260rem and nailed monkeys from 400 - 600 yards away. My favourite part was when they blasted a monkey from the power lines with a .416Rigby. Oh wait that was a different hunting show. Anyways the point is, if you guys ever want to stop dicking around with poodle shooters and actually want to get #### done, then move on up to the .338 - .458 caliber guns and start blasting monkeys off power lines.
 
1000 words......

dNow4jp.jpg
 
^^
Verbal diarrhea.
And no appreciable difference in the field.

There would be no difference in the field but I do like the fact that bullets can be seated out farther to reach the lands and still stay within the confines of a S/A mag box. That's one reason I have prefered the long action.

Plenty of brass and ammo isn't a bad thing either.
 
What can the 6.5 CM do that a .260 (or any other non magnum 6.5mm) can’t do?

Ballistically, just about nothing. But maybe it can finally get enough media hype to make a moderate velocity 6.5mm commercially successful and widely used in North America. If so it’s about time so I’ll be happy about it. Also it probably has more instagram followers (I hear that’s how real importance is measured these days).
 
So the two are essentially the same, but how does a 260 Rem Improved stack up against a 6.5 Creedmor Improved? ;)
 
Last edited:
I looked up some balistics (I have always been a fan of 6.5 x 55) Creedmoore does outperform the 6.5 Swede with lighter bullets; once you go 140gr + in bullets, the 6.5 Swede gives about a 100-150 fps advantage, and the co responding 200+ ft. lbs of energy. Yes, factory ammo is not easily come-by here; and there is not a great selection of rifles; but good rifles can be had. The 260 is similar; go over 140 gr. you get about 100 fps more and about 150 ft. lbs more energy... On paper...

In real life, there is not a lot of difference... so I will stick with my antique 6.5 x 55 ammo. LOL

BTW, no deer for me out at 1000 yards (on a good day I can almost see that far).

This thread is .260 vs 6.5 CM...

I guess you only read the first couple of sentences of each post?
 
Back
Top Bottom