M10x, what optics do you recommend?

[DullParadox]

the M10x seemed to have arrived and I was wondering what optic to put on the rifle. at first I was thinking the psu 4x by NPZ or 1p78-1p, but there are so many optics that are well suited for 7.62x39.

 

[Kingjenky]

Primary arms
https://ctcsupplies.ca/collections/primary-arms

 

[BlackVoid]

It's a 2-4 MOA "DMR" rifle. So go red dot.

 

[FoxAlpha]

It's a 2-4 MOA "DMR" rifle. So go red dot.

Bingo

 

[Paul_T]

It's a 2-4 MOA "DMR" rifle.

2-4 MOA DMR - people who spend 2000 plus should cry reading that specification ....

Yep, based on that accuracy go with some type of Red Dot or low power scope.

 

[bananarama]

Im selling a 4moa aimpoint...
Pretty good deal.
just saying.

 

[phin11]

ak optics

http://www.bushnell.com/tactical/riflescopes/ak-optics/ak-1-4x-24mm

 

[tharkhold]

2-4 MOA?

Huh, if you approach it like a shotgun, just aim "over there"

 

[Paul_1982]

Where are you guys sourcing cheek risers? Zhukov looks pretty low. I cant find any in stock in Canada.

 

[BlackVoid]

2-4 MOA?

Huh, if you approach it like a shotgun, just aim "over there"

4 MOA is fine for a battle rifle. people usually pick and chose the best groups, discarding "flyers" etc.

I had extremely good results with CSA Vz-58 (2MOA scoped/supported), which was a mystery for me for a while, until i found out that CSA uses Lothar Walther barrels. Same ammo with t81 was giving me consistent 6-8MOA with irons.

So who knows how M10x is going to shoot really, until we get our sweaty hands on it. DMR it is not though, especially with a known "sniping" round like 7.62x39, lol.

 

[Can-down]

4 MOA is fine for a battle rifle. people usually pick and chose the best groups, discarding "flyers" etc.

I had extremely good results with CSA Vz-58 (2MOA scoped/supported), which was a mystery for me for a while, until i found out that CSA uses Lothar Walther barrels. Same ammo with t81 was giving me consistent 6-8MOA with irons.

So who knows how M10x is going to shoot really, until we get our sweaty hands on it. DMR it is not though, especially with a known "sniping" round like 7.62x39, lol.

No reason for quality 7.62X39 ammo not to shoot well, but it's a bonus if a gun shoots the surplus stuff well!

 

[DT741]

A DMR red dot

 

[frabill]

Something expensive to bring the overall price even higher.

 

[Murray 3-D]

If it was me, Id personally choose this.

https://ctcsupplies.ca/collections/primary-arms/products/primary-arms-1-6x-scope-with-acss-7-62x39-reticle

 

[skatemike77]

Cant go wrong with a DMR red dot to match the DMR safety.

 

[GUB]

Don't cheap out on glass..after all this gun will shoot into space!! Just like the 81

 

[bfiles]

2-4 MOA?

Huh, if you approach it like a shotgun, just aim "over there"

Well I guess my old ACR DMR was a shotgun too, cuz it was hitting right around the same Moa but for $1500 MORE then the m10x and with more expensive ammo hahahaha

 

[bfiles]

But I'm sure everyone mocking will be just fine with their 1000$ macdef reciever set LMAO

Or let's not forget all the people who bought into the BCL102, hope more people can actually use their rifles then what I've seen and read on. Cuz everyone knows at 1750$ to have a NR black rifle that doesn't work out of the box is a good deal Hahahahahahha

 

[bfiles]

Oh but to answer the question from the OP, anyone who actually thinks it's a dmr and set it up with 3-9x or the like is kidding themselves for what they will get for accuracy.

Aimpoint or holosun for my run and gun set up for me

 

[shoota]

It's a 2-4 MOA "DMR" rifle. So go red dot.

Funny any rack grade AR is probably 2-4 MOA with run of the mill bulk ammo, yet guys still throw expensive optics on them.