While loading up some rounds earlier I got to thinking about each method and which is better
I've done more OCW testing and for me it feels better as I can see how well the various 3 or 5 rounds group with each powder step, which is ultimately the end goal. My experience suggests the biggest variable with this method is the person behind the trigger being as consistent as possible.
Ladder testing is easier and less costly, the logic seems sound and if you can identify nodes or flat spots then in theory it should result in more consistent shooting. I imagine this method requires a very accurate weigh scale to be effective otherwise its somewhat pointless.
Has anyone used both methods? If so how did they compare? Did nodes identified by the ladder method always result in good results on target, ie tight groups or were there instances were the best groups were found outside of the indicated nodes?
I've done more OCW testing and for me it feels better as I can see how well the various 3 or 5 rounds group with each powder step, which is ultimately the end goal. My experience suggests the biggest variable with this method is the person behind the trigger being as consistent as possible.
Ladder testing is easier and less costly, the logic seems sound and if you can identify nodes or flat spots then in theory it should result in more consistent shooting. I imagine this method requires a very accurate weigh scale to be effective otherwise its somewhat pointless.
Has anyone used both methods? If so how did they compare? Did nodes identified by the ladder method always result in good results on target, ie tight groups or were there instances were the best groups were found outside of the indicated nodes?


















































