Modern Sporter Update April 5th 2018

They said whichever has more demand.
Right now it looks as if FA is in front.

That’s the only one I want.

Yeah I know what they said and I'm saying I just wanna know which they are gonna produce first so I don't choose the upper going into production last IE slick side
 
Yeah I know what they said and I'm saying I just wanna know which they are gonna produce first so I don't choose the upper going into production last IE slick side

Well they said , they’re gonna email all the people who have emailed them.
And from that they’re going to decide which is first.

Then you’ll have the option to buy or wait.

Only problem with that is ,a lot of people have probably got on the email list, but won’t end up buying anything.
In my case, I’ve alread paid for the lower, so I’m hoping it’s gonna be the guys who have already paid, that gets to decide.
 
Money is already sent. All I'm asking for is an email saying "hey people who bought the lower. This type of upper is being produced first. If you want this kind send money. If you want the other kind you have to wait"


I didn't think the concept was so hard to grasp but who am I kidding here.
 
Money is already sent. All I'm asking for is an email saying "hey people who bought the lower. This type of upper is being produced first. If you want this kind send money. If you want the other kind you have to wait"


I didn't think the concept was so hard to grasp but who am I kidding here.

I guess they want to know what the majority wants.
That’s the reasoning for two emails.

Why would they produce a SS first if 80% wants the FA.

Looks like there’s a battle brewing ... SS verses FA ... ha ha
 
Speaking of forward assists - don't care whether it has one or not. The first produced will be the first on my list.
I read somewhere that if the round doesn't want to go into the chamber if you pull the charging handle back and let it go home, it shouldn't be forced in with a forward assist anyway.
 
Speaking of forward assists - don't care whether it has one or not. The first produced will be the first on my list.
I read somewhere that if the round doesn't want to go into the chamber if you pull the charging handle back and let it go home, it shouldn't be forced in with a forward assist anyway.

Correct, but that's not what we use it for.
 
If one day this finally has a NR ruling, would I be able to build a super short(~7” barrel) dedicated 22LR version and call it NR? Making sure the OAL is 26”+

You’ll need around an 11” barrel, but yes. Has to be a manufactured 22LR barrel as well, not 223 converted. I’ll be making one.
 
You’ll need around an 11” barrel, but yes. Has to be a manufactured 22LR barrel as well, not 223 converted. I’ll be making one.

I’m thinking logistically, how would one prove that it’s a 22LR only? Cuz when you pull out the conversion kit, which is just the BCG, it can probably fire a 223 round just fine.
 
CMMG has one and someone else.

CMMG does have them but I don’t know about the barrels in those kits. The kit has a collar adapter for the bolt so is it adapting a regular M4 collar? The bolt looks to be the same as the conversion kit bolts. Not saying it isn’t legal, but I’d do some research into it before the RCMP were to ask when in the field.

My kit is from a Spikes ST-22 upper, out of production I think but gunbroker still has the 16” versions (not cheap). Haven’t seen another 11” version like mine anywhere. The barrel has the 22LR collar built in (no barrel extension) so you can’t run 223 in it.
 
CMMG does have them but I don’t know about the barrels in those kits. The kit has a collar adapter for the bolt so is it adapting a regular M4 collar? The bolt looks to be the same as the conversion kit bolts. Not saying it isn’t legal, but I’d do some research into it before the RCMP were to ask when in the field.

My kit is from a Spikes ST-22 upper, out of production I think but gunbroker still has the 16” versions (not cheap). Haven’t seen another 11” version like mine anywhere. The barrel has the 22LR collar built in (no barrel extension) so you can’t run 223 in it.


The CMMG looks like it should fit.

Installs on a mil-spec upper receiver using a standard or free-float barrel nut.

p_100006726_18.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom