Work Guns I’ve Known

Ardent

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
818   0   2
Work Guns I’ve Known

Work Guns I’ve Known…



I have owned and have used a diverse range of guns in my professions in the outdoors as a bush pilot and guide outfitter who specialized in coastal Grizzlies, Brown bears to our American friends. The guns range from a .375 H&H double rifle to a Glock. Those two actually mark the beginning and ends of the progression to date, without saying the Glock is the best yet by any means. Each excelled and was limited in different ways, and for fun, I wanted to detail them and reminisce a bit, in chronological order. I’ve owned and carried for work occasionally many, many guns not listed here, but these are the few that saw months of service at minimum, and the ones I liked years.



Merkel .375 H&H 140AE Double Rifle



The gun that pulls my heartstrings the most in memory. My Merkel double flew with me for scores of flight hours in the day job as a helicopter pilot in the north and outfitting being a handy takedown, as doubles naturally are. It pointed like a ten pound Red Rider BB gun, that is to say like lighting, and shot where I was looking even if I ignored the sights and fired both eyes open. I did some speed shooting with it knocking pairs of wood blocks about to practice target transitions, and it was the fastest gun I’ve owned, even over far lighter chamberings and semi automatics. Doubles rule the world of speed… for two rounds. They point like shotguns, and are extremely compact owing to zero action length. They’re also sealed to the elements; IF you trust the safety. The closest scrapes I’ve had with the big bears all happened with the Merkel for whatever reason too, and it was a great comfort on several occasions when an underhand tossed pebble would of landed behind the bear.



Pros:



-Very good stopping power and penetration

-Very quick handling and instinctive shooting

-No sharp edges or protrusions to snag gear

-Excellent iron sights



Cons:



-Weather sensitive, blued carbon steel

-Heavy enough to be a reliable boat anchor in an emergency

-Too expensive to leave unattended in boats or river camps that may flash flood etc

-I often carried it open with two in it, to have it safe yet ready, as I don’t trust tang safeties

The Merkel doing what it does best with an adversary, that at closest was eight yards from its muzzles; and that likely overestimates the range.

64pglzJ.jpg


In its natural environment at the cabin.

yIeXc10.jpg


Stoked for work.

YXndBSx.jpg






Mossberg 12ga 590A1 14”



This gun was the first step towards carrying a Glock. I needed something cheap I could beat up, not worry about, and lighter. The compactness and weight were wonderful on a handy single point hands free sling, but I hated this gun. It was also far less reliable than others I’ve carried in that despite being mil spec and supposedly built for extreme use, it gummed up with wet sand and salt spray and jammed quicker than any other. Internals rusted sooner owing to the gaping ports, and were fragile, with semi exposed critical parts like the shell lifter. It wasn’t the workhorse I expected and I have little good to say about it honestly, I also found 12 gauge slug ballistics and stopping power to be lacking compared to a .375 H&H which has no more recoil than the slugs. Less in fact, due to the heavier guns the .375 H&Hs are. Sound like I hated this gun? I did.



Pros:



-Compact

-Cost effective

-Ammo versatility (flares, bangers, bird shot to fill the pot, etc)



Cons:



-Susceptible to the elements

-Weak internals (compared to Model 70s and Doubles)

-Inaccurate in comparison to rifles

-Inferior stopping power as compared to higher velocity rifles

590A1 with the track of a bear that left thirty seconds before. I was coming up river with Greg (member Hoytcanon), and we found these tracks on the the bar and sand crumbles on a log where he’d stood to listen to our approach.

Jon0Po1.jpg


The gun I loved to hate. While skinning a Grizzling in the water at dark, the Mossberg took a bath. The source of some of my problems with it were not the gun’s fault, to be sure.

w6s0ENG.jpg


Boat rides and salt spray. Yea I wasn’t exactly fair to it.

MI0GT4B.jpg



Winchester Model 70 Classic Stainless .375 H&H



A rifle that compromised between most factors I asked. Weatherproof, lighter, powerful, decent handling and pointing, and cheaper. I really like the Model 70, and still own one of this exact model, I gave my second to one of my former guides and shouldn’t have. I’ve owned this same somewhat rare Model 70 three times now, probably a good indication I should hang onto this last one. They aren’t perfect at anything, but in heavy Grizzly / Brown bear country in the salmon run are good enough at everything to be a dependable and trustworthy main gun and friend. They’re exactly what the Model 70 legend purports it to be; dependable, reliable, affordable. They’re a legend for a reason. Damn shame Winchester has killed this model.



Pros:



-Stopping power and penetration

-Weatherproof

-Cost effective

-Intuitive, solid safety and controls



Cons:



-Still heavy although lighter than the double

-Long overall length

-Poorer handling and speed than the double

-Mediocre factory iron sights

On the job with the Model 70 Stainless Classic .375 H&H.

EwCcDDX.jpg


Model 70 friend.

yRrDgA0.jpg


Made to work.

C5u0yF1.jpg

QXq6fDc.jpg

hjF9NhK.jpg




Glock 40 (Longslide 10mm)



Glockasaurus as I call it affectionately, is my soulless companion. It weighs nothing, is slim, and is always there. I needed a hands free, lightweight solution as I’m flying bushplanes, running river jet boats, and packing mountain goats down and need to shed pounds. The Glock offers the lightest and most compact, and most hands free solution, and begrudgingly I’ve come to love it. Utterly weatherproof, light enough to forget it is there, and safe to carry ready it has become an unexpected friend. There isn’t much to say here as there’s nothing to wax eloquently on about with it, it’s just a damn fine tool.



Pros:



-Lightest option

-Smallest option

-Hands free, I never put it down

-Affordable



Cons:



-Weak stopping power in comparison to rifles



Thanks for reading, each gun has its place and I’m always trying to find the best. The best, would be the Glock complimenting a stainless double rifle I can afford to lose. That doesn’t exist… Butch Searcy offered to make me a stainless .375 double at a very fair price, and I’m sorely tempted. Will be fun to see where that thought goes.

a3hKYBV.jpg

3ElIn0v.jpg

KCgBItt.jpg

URCwbWW.jpg


Will add further thoughts on some ultimate work gun builds, one that didn’t satisfy despite no expense spared.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for sharing. You probably have the best review any one can give a gun considering you actually use and abuse stuff.

I always knew my model 70 awesome and the Mossberg was over rated. Thanks for letting me know I am not a complete dumb@ss

Opinion on bear spray?
 
wonder how much better (or not) the 590a1 might have faired with a good ceracote job ?

Thanks for the excellent pictures and thoughts.
 
Why the glock over a revolver? The weight savings and increased capacity?

And why the long slide?

Weight is number one, then slimness and capacity. It’s just a far more user friendly package for me than my big revolvers were, and terminal effictiveness of all pistol rounds even my old .44 Mag and .475 Linebaugh are highly limited. A handgun is already a severe compromise and unreliable stopper, I’d rather carry the most comfortable option. I also have more faith in three hot 200gr 10mms than one .44, .454, or .475. That’s the rate of accurate fire difference between the two, and after three 10mms are loosed, I still have eight rounds left compared to the five or four remaining in the big revolvers. Longslide as they ballistics are marginally better, but mainly they shoot better in a hurry, less muzzle jump and the longer sight radius points far more naturally.

Nice Wilga too!

She’s fun!

wonder how much better (or not) the 590a1 might have faired with a good ceracote job ?

Thanks for the excellent pictures and thoughts.

It’s just too finnicky and complicated an action, and too exposed to sand and grit. Applies to all of them expect perhaps the Browning with the bottom port only and “hidden” shell lifter. In the end 12ga slug terminal ballistics on big stuff were so unimpressive there was no need to pursue a better gun of the pattern in my eyes.

Opinion on bear spray?


Hate to admit it but safer than guns most of the time, I just can’t fly with it in the aircraft. If you’re not trying to hunt a bear it’s the best option usually, but when you’re trying to hunt the bear you need a firearm to back up, as it’s a one way trip so to speak.
 
Last edited:
you;ve been quiet..

You probably didn’t realise that was a math question :d 2.5 careers, 3.0 young kids, 110% forest fire season. [(C2.5)(K3)(F1.1)]0.01= CGN or something like that.

Fantastic post, I hope you share your thoughts on the titanium 375 you had built. It was a dandy rifle.

That’s the next part I mentioned at the bottom I have to add! Built the wrong gun, swing and a miss there. Will get into that.

Are you strictly carrying the Glock now or do you also carry the M70?

Mix of both right now indeed, but a lot of the time lately just the Glock. It’s too simple.
 
Hey Angus

I’m sure you are aware of the common issue with the 3 position safety on the Classic actions. The fact that when on safe with the bolt locked down the bolt handle can be raised slightly. This allows the safety to be moved to the middle position but sometimes can’t be moved to the fire position until the bolt handle is pushed back down. I’m just wondering if you address this issue with your working Model 70 Classics?
 
As you know... that Mossberg was abhorrent to me... the Glock is a tough sell, while I get the attraction, a gun in hand is better than one back at camp, when you need it in a hurry... and Phil proved it's legitimacy in a lesser form... your Merkel .375 H&H is brilliant and you can never go wrong with an M70, particularly in .375. I am surprised to not see the RSM in the group, although you may not have been technically "working" when carrying it? It certainly did see a lot of miles and much game taken... and the RSM is about as "Rifley" as rifles get... they just feel made for serious business. Good post.
 
As you know... that Mossberg was abhorrent to me... the Glock is a tough sell, while I get the attraction, a gun in hand is better than one back at camp, when you need it in a hurry... and Phil proved it's legitimacy in a lesser form... your Merkel .375 H&H is brilliant and you can never go wrong with an M70, particularly in .375. I am surprised to not see the RSM in the group, although you may not have been technically "working" when carrying it? It certainly did see a lot of miles and much game taken... and the RSM is about as "Rifley" as rifles get... they just feel made for serious business. Good post.

Your disdain for the Mossberg was poorly concealed Laugh2

Yea the RSM got a lot of miles but always for pleasure, early on carried it guiding a bit but not enough to make the list. Was my most experienced rifle for sure though overall! Weight and weather resistance were its only faults, hell of a gun.

I like your last gun your guided Grizz with in particular! The stainless .350 Rem Mag M77 MkII, now that’s a mean package in Grizz country. Pretty ideal weight of a carbine with a punch.

have you ever considered something like an 1895 guide in stainless?

I have, but trust the .375 H&H more than the .45-70 / .450. Not a fan of this rounds ballistics for stopping bears, it’s my opinion they lack the velocity the .375 benefits from. Some of the most impressive Grizzly kills I’ve seen were .300 and 7mm magnums, speed has a better chance of dropping them on their shadow. Heavy and slow kills 100% reliably but seems to allow, on average not every time, for more seconds of running / nervous movement after the hits.
 
Back
Top Bottom