Worth it financially?

Not all 223 is equal. If you want to reload to save (which you seem to do, since you ask that question), then not really. At most you'll save a penny or 2 per round if you reload using bulk bullets compared to bulk ammos. If you're reloading precision stuff with match grade ammos or hunting ammos, then yeah, you can save more per round.

Typically, the more expensive an ammunition cost, the more saving (even in %) there is. Bulk 223 is the worst of all though, worst than bulk 9mm.

If you do a search on this forum you'll see this question is asked at least once a month, and a lot of answers are very well detailed with breakdown of costs and such.
 
Not all 223 is equal. If you want to reload to save (which you seem to do, since you ask that question), then not really. At most you'll save a penny or 2 per round if you reload using bulk bullets compared to bulk ammos. If you're reloading precision stuff with match grade ammos or hunting ammos, then yeah, you can save more per round.

Typically, the more expensive an ammunition cost, the more saving (even in %) there is. Bulk 223 is the worst of all though, worst than bulk 9mm.

If you do a search on this forum you'll see this question is asked at least once a month, and a lot of answers are very well detailed with breakdown of costs and such.

Sorry, I was not clear. I know I won't save a lot, but when I started reloading shots hello for skeet, it actually cost more. If I can save a little and expand into other calibers it sounds like it is feasible. As long as I can stay around $500 to get started. I have a 270 and will eventually find a nice 303. It sounds like I would save a bit on those.
Cheers
 
Thanks for this Boomer...I believe I will have a go at it. Sounds like a manual scale will be precise enough, digital just saving time? I would like to add 270 dies in as well, so might be better to go with rcbs press? I don't want to spend a fortune, but I don't like buying cheap and end up replacing it later...so it needs a balance.

My press is an RCBS Rockchucker. I like like both RCBC and Redding products if full size cartridges are to be resized.
 
That's a good start. The press, scale, manual and priming tool alone will cost you close to $500 if bought separately. The rest is a bonus.
You will still need a case trimmer, caliper, shell holder, and dies for a basic setup. You may not need the case trimmer immediately but you WILL need one at some point.
The priming arm that comes as part of that press isn't worth the powder to blow it to hell IMO. The separate priming tool is a definite improvement. Depending on which model it is you may need a second shell holder for it.
Case cleaning is another facet of reloading. Some clean the exterior of the case only, others wet or dry tumble their cases.
The RCBS Rockchucker is in many opinions the standard by which others are judged, certainly a well respected, solidly built tool.
You'll eventually want a bullet puller too, I'd highly recommend a collet puller that allows you to pull bullets using the press. The hammer type inertia pullers get mixed reviews and their durability reflects the fact that you hammer the hell out of them to make them work. Even a high end Forster collet puller will run you less than $50 and last a lifetime.
I will point out that just the kit alone puts you over budget though. Add in the rest of the bare necessities and you're pushing $1k. Some stuff you can find used, in good shape.
 
oh I save money reloading

325WSM if you can find some its around $120 a box

577/450 again if you can find some I think its about $12/round.

so for some calibers it very economical and once you've invested in a press, scales, etc... then it makes it more economical to add another set of dies for other calibers.
 
I started reloading a little less than a year ago. $500 will get you started with the basics but you will want to upgrade as you go. I've spent another $300 or so and my wish list is looking very $$$

You won't save much on 223 if you're looking to replicate bulk ammo. I reload for a couple 308s; the reloads for my semi save me $0.17 per round over buying surplus and the loads for my precision bolt action save me about $1 over good factory ammo (depends on load). So it's more worth your time if you are looking for quality/accuracy. Your savings on 223 will probably be half of my 308 savings, so as little as 8 cents is what I would expect.
 
I save plenty on slightly less than mainstream calibers such as weatherby rounds or 50 bmg. That said I mainly reload because I can make them better and I feel assured that I will have ammo when I need and not be at the whims of market or possibly government induced shortages. I have a die and bullet mould for virtually every caliber I own( I honestly have lost count) and I am not not likely to run out of ammo anytime in my lifetime.
 
in the not to distant future, I predict ammo purchases will be regulated by government decree so the peasants can't hurt others around them or themselves. sometimes it isn't a matter of finances.
 
As some one who tinkers. Yes reloading is great, it gives you a greater diversity of bullet weights and velocities, yes I feel it will be a cost savings after around 1000 rounds, as you will need to buy some gear, also once you have your press, you can wander into different calibers, with the way uncle Justin is you might find yourself buying a pound of pot before you can buy a pound of powder so, you will have one up if ammo sources dry up.
 
in the not to distant future, I predict ammo purchases will be regulated by government decree so the peasants can't hurt others around them or themselves. sometimes it isn't a matter of finances.

Amen brother, honestly I don't see why the government has not done this already, why bother with the hassle of gun control when you can just turn off the ammo tap and make the guns in existence useless.
 
Suggestion for OP - find someone local who can introduce you to reloading, and see if you enjoy the process. I sometimes bring some equipment to the range to allow a newbie to load their own ammo and fire it right there. You won’t save money loading only for one relatively inexpensive caliber (.223) - even with the most basic equipment. But, if you get introduced to the process and end up liking it, you could begin exploring a variety of calibers - and it doesn’t take long for the economics to work, plus you get to load and shoot ammo that will take you to a new level of precision, which in itself can be very rewarding!
 
Just financially? Or is your time worth something as well? If reloading is a job for you whose sole purpose is to save money over buying factory ammunition, then the time you will spend doing something you do not particularly like doing will not justify reloading. If you think you will enjoy reloading to some degree and/or get something out of reloading that buying ammunition in bulk won't deliver, then you're a candidate for reloading.

For your .223/5.56 fix, you can save some money if you wait for sales to buy your components in bulk just like others wait for sales to buy their bulk ammunition. Depending on your rifle and your accuracy expectations, you may get a meaningful improvement in accuracy by handloading over bulk ammo - or you may not. The last bulk bullet buy I made for .223, I spent more money buying .223 bullets in bulk than you're budgeting to get started - but I have a supply of bullets for a long, long time to come.

If you progress into other centerfire cartridges like the .303 British and .270 you mentioned, then savings are more likely. Accuracy gains, again, will depend on your rifle and expectations - although the .303 British is one cartridge these days that really rewards the reloader versus what you can buy commercially.

The money saved/time spent/equipment used equation is like calculus to try and figure out. My .223 ammunition and all my handgun ammunition gets done on a Dillon 650. That is a spendy press, but I bought one when they first came out; over the about three decades since it has paid for itself in the time it has saved me many times over. It took me quite a few trips to the range, but I found a load for my AR-15 that will hold 10 rounds to 1.1 MOA out to 500 yards. Not a varmint rifle by any means, but good enough for trips to Montana to shoot gophers with out to 300 yards just for fun, or any military match you might have in mind. I have yet to find any of the common, cheap .223 ammunition that will do anything close to that out of my rifle.

All my other centerfire rifle ammunition gets reloaded on a Bonanza Co-Ax press. Although I keep threatening to try reloading 22-250 on the Dillon press for my Sako, just to see what if any accuracy I lose by going the progressive loading workflow, versus the single stage press workflow. The Bonanza is another somewhat spendy piece of kit. But again, I went from a Rockchucker press to the Bonanza back in the late 1970's when I started into handgun competition. Reloading handgun in those volumes is a pain in the ass on a single stage, and back then progressive presses like the Star were like Porsche cars - way outside my budget. The Bonanza's ability to change dies in seconds by simply sliding them in and out was and is a real time saver, and like my Dillon, it has paid for itself many times over since I bought it.

A common thread I share with many reloaders is that in the last 50 years I have progressed from the most basic reloading setup going (our Dad bought a Black Bair C-press so he could afford to take us shooting more), to a pretty comprehensive setup that saves me a lot of both money and time. Things got added or replaced over the years as my shooting volume increased and as I found out where that would save me time or improve the quality of the ammunition (usually it was the "save time" factor). It's obvious that you aren't thinking about starting with a progressive (few do), but if you do enough shooting and get serious about what reloading can do for you, progressive presses are more than able to deliver both significant time savings and a high degree of precision in cartridges like .223. I generally do somewhere around 1500 rounds of .223 at one sitting - I would hate to think of going back to doing that on a single stage press. If I wanted to shoot more than a few hundred rounds a year in my other centerfire rifles, they would get reloaded on the Dillon as well.

If you have a friend who reloads, then you can see if they will allow you to use their setup if you provide the dies and components to give it a try. That has the additional benefit of having somebody who presumably has some idea of what they're doing to help you get started. That is probably about as inexpensive as you can get when it comes to trying reloading to see if it works for you. If that's not possible, then there's two options: First, buy as inexpensively as possible, like one of the starter kits offered by some of the companies. You can buy used, but unless you really know what to look for, that's a crap shoot. Or second, buy a few quality items where you think it matters, and go low cost on the remainder. Based on my experiences, I would suggest starting with a Co-Ax press and a decent mechanical scale, and then going from there with the rest. If you continue reloading, you'll never regret buying the Co-Ax and you'll always have a use for a single stage even if you do go into progressive reloading. If you decide it is not for you, you won't have any trouble whatsoever selling a Co-Ax for a pretty good dollar here or at other forums.

Then there's the "fun factor" of reloading. I used to really enjoy just turning out ammunition for my trips to the range. At some point or other, looking forward to spending evenings at the reloading bench turning out ammunition ceased to be fun. Just like casting bullets for shooting, tying flies for fishing, etc also ceased to be fun. Didn't become a chore, but now it's just part of the non-shooting part of the sport, like cleaning the rifles after you get home.

The fun factor of searching for the best load possible for a rifle/bullet combination has never changed, however. I still see that as an enjoyable hobby, to the point I often develop loads for other peoples' rifles - as long as they foot the bill for the components.

Ultimately, the biggest factor is what you want and what your expectations are. There's a bit of a learning curve to begin with as you figure out the most efficient workflow for reloading for each of your rifles; if you just dabble with reloading and just shoot a hundred or so rifle rounds each year, then you probably won't move much beyond square one. If (like a lot of us) reloading finds you doing more shooting, and more shooting has you looking for better results, then at the other end of the scale you can go right down the rabbit hole.

And that's the best non-answer I can give to your question.
 
Is it much cheaper to reload 223 ammo?

Cost break down of my 223 plinking loads:
- Projectile: Campro 55gr fmjbt - $57.99/500 => $0.116 / rd
- Powder: H335 8lb jug $230 -> each round use about 25 grain => 2240 rounds per 8lb jug => $0.103 / rd
- Primer: S&B small rifle primer $34.99/1000 => $0.035 / rd
- Case: Free
Total => $0.254 + tax => $0.287 / rd

Quality of this load is comparable to the cheapest factory ammo.
You save about 20 cents per round, or $20 per 100 rounds for a typical range trip.
I found about 40% saving is a good estimate for reloading popular calibers (9/45/223/308). Remember the actual saving is more if you shoot high end stuff.

Should you get into it? I think the key is would you enjoy tinkering with reloading? If the answer is no then you will find yourself stop using the equipment a few months after. If you like playing with variables then reloading is rewarding in itself, and saving just comes in as a side effect.
 
Back
Top Bottom