Picture of the day

13ecf750f3efe4efdc176a87da32a7af.jpg


Caption from Russian website.
The crew of Char B1 ı350 “Fleurie” poses by his car during maneuvers in February 1940.
In the center is Sergeant Chef Jacques Dumay (killed June 15, 1940 by Montsuzain).
Right adjutant Levasseur ( killed June 12, 1940 in Mourmelon (Mourmelon).
Each In 1bis had its own name, usually in each battalion the names of the tanks corresponded to a specific theme:
41 and 49 battalions (tanks B 1bis No. 346-375) carried the names of French wines. Fleurie - "blooming."
Pay attention to the TPU plugs hanging in the belt of the tankers.
 
And the winner of the fattest beer barrel award in the Portly Pursuit Plane Category is........

Polikarpov I-16

Polikarpov_I-16-Spain_%28clipped%29.jpg


1024px-Operation_Barbarossa_-_Russian_planes.jpg


800px-Polikarpov_I-16.jpg


Polikarpov_I-16_%28China_Aviation_Museum%29.jpg

I wonder if Mao knew? :)

800px-I-16_Moscow.jpg


1024px-Polikarpov_uti4_helsinki_2.jpg


1024px-Polikarpov_I-16_with_spanish_republican_markings.jpg

¿Hablas Ruso, camarada?
 
Last edited:
Canadian Car and Foundry FDB-1

1024px-Gregor_FDB-1.jpg


Gregor_FDB-1_test.jpg


Gregor-card.jpg

1024px-FDB-1.drawing.jpg


Design and development
In 1938, American and Georgian expatriate designer Michael Gregor/Mikheil Grigorashvili approached Canadian Car & Foundry, at the time, that country's leading manufacturer of rolling stock, which had limited experience building airplanes, but wanted to enter that field. Instead of building its own designs, Can-Car was producing Curtiss, de Havilland, Consolidated, Bristol and Hawker products under license. In 1936, Grumman and Canadian Car & Foundry or "Can-Car" concluded an agreement for production of 50 revised Grumman SF-1 carrier fighters, with 700 hp. Wright R-1820-78 radial power-plants and known as GE-23s or Grumman Exports 23s, that would be put together in Canada (although some were actually assembled in Spain).

In 1938, there were many aviation observers who doubted the supposed merits of the emerging monoplane over the proven performance of reliable biplanes. Most of the major powers' front line fighter units employed biplanes. The Soviet Union, despite having recently developed the Polikarpov I-16 (the first successful production monoplane fighter with retracting gear), still depended heavily on biplanes. Great Britain's RAF and Nazi Germany's Luftwaffe had likewise embraced the monoplane but, respectively, continued to deploy the Gloster Gladiator and the Heinkel He 51 biplane fighters. In Fascist Italy, the series of Fiat CR.32 in operation and the Fiat CR.42 biplane fighters were entering service while the U.S. Navy operated biplane fighters exclusively.

https://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/cancelled-gregor-fdb-1-180952402/
 
Last edited:
Polikarpov_I-16_%28China_Aviation_Museum%29.jpg

I wonder if Mao knew? :)

He knew very well.He and Chinese communist leaders went to great lengths to take over Russian supplies going to Kuomintang and failed for a long time.Stalin wasn't very fond of them till his very end.

Btw-If I remember well enough that is a not very good static replica of I-16 build by some organisation in China (I think students of some sort).They donated it to museum since they didn't have room to display it.
 
If the MiG-35 is anything like other Russian equipment, it will be low-maintenance, rugged, expensive on fuel and able to operate almost anywhere.

Almost sounds like a recipe for duty in this country.

Why haven't we designed and built our own?
 
Back
Top Bottom