CZ 557 Sporter 30-06

J_Impact

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
9   0   0
I'm looking at stepping into another hunting rifle and have been looking at getting into a CZ 557 Sporter in a 30-06, 20.5" barrel, and 7.5lbs. Only down side to me is the lack of a detachable magazine.

Does anybody have any experience with this rifle? What kind of scope are you running? What grain? What distances are you shooting? :popCorn:

Thanks for the advice and guidance!
 
I run a CZ557 sporter in .308 win...unlike the newer 557 range rifle my rifle is built on the long action, has the all-metal hinged floor plate, and a 20.5 inch barrel, so other than caliber it is the same rifle you describe above.

I specifically moved away from the range rifle because of it's detachable magazine; my experience being that the magazines rattled a bit, I did not care for the plastic parts in the trigger guard/bottommetal, and I've been gooned on a hunt before due to losing a magazine. What I liked better about the range rifle was it's two stage trigger...I felt it is a better trigger than the single stage trigger of my sporter and I also appreciated the three position safety of the range rifle better than the two position safety of the sporter.

I've set my sporter up with a vortex gen 2 PST 2-10x32 FFP in a set of leupold 30mm rings that I'll change out to Warne rings as soon as they arrive. The furthest I can safely shoot at my informal range is 500 meters, and I have no trouble hitting my 10 inch gong at this distance either proned-out or sitting-supported. The rig is a bit heavy to shoot well at this distance standing or sitting-unsupported, but I practice none-the-less...:) Thinking about this now, I hardly ever practice kneeling, going to have to amp-up effort on that one for sure.

All in all, I like the rifle a lot.

Good luck,

Brobee
 
I run a CZ557 sporter in .308 win...unlike the newer 557 range rifle my rifle is built on the long action, has the all-metal hinged floor plate, and a 20.5 inch barrel, so other than caliber it is the same rifle you describe above.

I specifically moved away from the range rifle because of it's detachable magazine; my experience being that the magazines rattled a bit, I did not care for the plastic parts in the trigger guard/bottommetal, and I've been gooned on a hunt before due to losing a magazine. What I liked better about the range rifle was it's two stage trigger...I felt it is a better trigger than the single stage trigger of my sporter and I also appreciated the three position safety of the range rifle better than the two position safety of the sporter.

I've set my sporter up with a vortex gen 2 PST 2-10x32 FFP in a set of leupold 30mm rings that I'll change out to Warne rings as soon as they arrive. The furthest I can safely shoot at my informal range is 500 meters, and I have no trouble hitting my 10 inch gong at this distance either proned-out or sitting-supported. The rig is a bit heavy to shoot well at this distance standing or sitting-unsupported, but I practice none-the-less...:) Thinking about this now, I hardly ever practice kneeling, going to have to amp-up effort on that one for sure.

All in all, I like the rifle a lot.

Good luck,

Brobee

Thanks for the info.

Any reason you specifically went with the 32 lens on the scope?

What type of ammo have you been running through it?

Sounds like you've got a good shooter at 500!!
 
I have one in 308, shoot mainly 150 and 165 gr bullets and the most I shoot with it is 200 yards and it does very well. I have a older vari x ii 3x9x40 scope on it with Burris rings. Love the 20" barrel as well, great for toting around in the Bush!
 
I have shot the CZ 557 ranger. The recoil is somewhat heavy so stuck a "Shooters friend" on it for the range. Almost like it was meant to be there and makes it as soft as a kitten. I was hunting with a 8mm before but thought a carbine would be nice.

If just using it for a hunting rifle the solid floor plate version would be very acceptable too. The polymer magazines of the 557 ranger are not nearly as good as the magazines on the little sister CZ527 with there right fitting metal magazines. If I were to buy another I'd probably get the non detachable magazine version. Still it's a solid heavy stocked rifle that will last for a long time as a workhorse.

Just be prepared to break the rifle in. Both CZ527 (7.62×39) & CZ557 (308) took time cycling at home and about 150 to 200 rounds to shoot consistently accurate and where the bolt felt better to cycle. Initially both were rather choppy and stiff making me question what kind of pieces of junk I had bought. Now you couldn't take my CZ527 off my hands at government gunpoint. Hands down the best rifle purchase I ever made.

Source out some bulk or cheap 30-06 tenda sells 300 steel rounds and be prepared to fire em off and use it as practice because your renew CZ rifle will shoot way better after.
 
Last edited:
Are there any feeding or jamming problems with the 308 cartridge in the long action? Does the mag box have a spacer to take up the excess space? I’d like to buy one in 308, but can’t find a short action model in Canada.
 
I have a 557 Carbine .308, long action, internal mag. Basically a sporter with open sights. No feeding or jamming issues BUT it is a long stroke with that bolt. Its a great rifle, accurate as hell. A little heavy with all that metal and a very robust stock, but it eats up recoil. All in all a very high quality euro rifle.
 
I have a 557 Carbine .308, long action, internal mag. Basically a sporter with open sights. No feeding or jamming issues BUT it is a long stroke with that bolt. Its a great rifle, accurate as hell. A little heavy with all that metal and a very robust stock, but it eats up recoil. All in all a very high quality euro rifle.

I missed out on one of these at Tenda while I was trying to make up my mind. Seemed like a pretty great deal at under $1k.
 
The 557 without the ranger rail mount was a sweet rifle I almost bought a second one at Tenda. I like the ranger rifle so much that at some point I will probably pick up the 557 standard with regular internal magazine ti keep as an iron sighted shooter.
 
Thanks for the info.

Any reason you specifically went with the 32 lens on the scope?

What type of ammo have you been running through it?

Sounds like you've got a good shooter at 500!!

I like lower-power variables, but wanted full-featured external elevation adjustment with zero stop, windage, illumination, and a FFP reticle. Anything bigger in the vortex PST lineup seemed excessive for my needs, and although I really liked the Gen II PST Viper it did not have externally adjustable elevation, FFP reticle, or a zero stop.

I've mostly run my practice handloads through it (H4895, FGGM 210 primer, hornady brass, hornady 150gr FMJ), but have also shot barnes 165gr hunting ammo too. The rifle cloverleafs them all at 100.

Am now trying to sell this rifle as I can't find a second one to have for backup, moving instead back to the range rifle.

Cheers,

Brobee
 
I'm looking at stepping into another hunting rifle and have been looking at getting into a CZ 557 Sporter in a 30-06, 20.5" barrel, and 7.5lbs. Only down side to me is the lack of a detachable magazine.

Does anybody have any experience with this rifle? What kind of scope are you running? What grain? What distances are you shooting? :popCorn:

Thanks for the advice and guidance!

CZ rifles are good quality, and a hinged floorplate means you don't have a magazine that you'll forget, misplace, or loose, since its always with the rifle. A 20" .30/06 barks pretty loudly, but shooting is not a quite endeavor anyway.

Bullet choice is determined by the game you intend to hunt, and the range across which you intend to shoot. That said, if you are going to restrict yourself to a single load, there isn't much that a 180 gr bullet at 2700 fps won't do. A .30/06 is capable of shooting much further than most riflemen are capable, and if I told you how far I've stretched mine, you might be tempted to call me a liar, so lets just say on the far side of a half mile. Without having all the equipment necessary for shooting at long range, I would urge you to zero a couple of inches high at 100 yards, adjust so that your point of aim and point of impact coincide at 200 yards, then work your way out to 300 under varying wind and weather conditions, making note of your bullet drop and wind drift. By the time you've expended 500 rounds, shooting from field positions, across various ranges, and in a variety of conditions, you will have a good idea of what you can realistically do with your rifle.

Likewise a scope can't be recommended without knowing how your rifle will be used, and the circumstances under which it will be used. A 3-9X40 is so often recommended that there might not be much else to say, except that 3X might be too much magnification in some circumstances and 9X not enough in others. The advantage of the scope sight over irons is not magnification, is that both the reticle, that is the aiming point, is on the same focal plane as the target, so both are in simultaneous focus. The purpose of magnification is to enable the hunter to see is target. Magnification works against field of view, the greater the magnification the less field of view you have. If you have so much magnification that all you can see is hair, chances are you won't be able to make the shot, so the best you can do is attempt to find a balance between the magnification and field of view that is appropriate to your circumstances. Once you've determined what range of magnification is appropriate, you can decide on the make and model. When it comes to optics, choosing the least expensive option is false economy. Pick a good brand like Burris or Leupold, and if you can't manage one of those, choose from the better lines offered by Bushnell.

Equally important as the choice of scope is the choice of scope rings. On the economy side of the equation are the spring steel Weaver mounts, which are a PIA to tighten so the scope is not canted, but once tightened down, the scope won't move, and the large windage screws provide something of a quick detachable benefit. If spending more money makes you feel better, consider the rings made by Near Manufacturing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom