An option to seal off the left side and add a dust cover, sort of like the original 180.
WK180-C Folding Stock - Prototype
- Thread starter Mr Wolverine
- Start date
- Status
An option to seal off the left side and add a dust cover, sort of like the original 180.
Baitcaster
CGN Regular
- Location
- Toronto
This looks too bulky...
I was hoping more for a Type 89 kind of look haha...
Yes, this is better.
I'd just hope maybe a few rubber pad options, or something to adjust length of pull somewhere haha.
CobraGT
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- The rainy part of BC
simple, robust design. And if the height is correct, there is no need for an adjustable cheekpiece for the majority of optics, so why make it more complicated than it needs to be?
AlexF
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Eastern Canada
Is there any way to improve design so that all AR15 optics and other accessories fit perfectly without the need to add or jerry rig.
The idea is to avoid to abomination below!
The idea is to avoid to abomination below!
ULFHEDNAR
Regular
- Location
- ON THE FRINGE
think FN para folder
Northern Rockies
New member
- Location
- NT.
A Magpul Zhukov stock adapted to the WK180 might work well.
AlexF
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Eastern Canada
I didn't think that this was the case but the Galil stock would be fine in that case.
I've had issues mounting optics on semis for almost 35 years and the flat top railed AR15 finally fixed everything.
vtham
CGN Regular
- Location
- SW Ontario
Too busy. Keep it simple
Henry Martini
Member
Mein Gott!
zupermann
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Punk-Ass-istan (Edmonton)
A G36 or a Galil style would be nicer (sorry).
rhino62
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- BC - Interior
Too bulky, also what does it weigh?
Martim
Member
- Location
- Collingwood
Almost Perfect
I have run about 1K of Independence /IMI m193 and AE m855 and the gun is running nice and smooth few stove pipes with Ind/IMI but its to be expected. SPARC II reddot 50 meters about a inch or less.
The only thing that's a pain in the ass about the gun is the trigger finger opening. The geometry of the gun need to be twerked a bit the trigger window need to be squared up or the bottom of the frame needs to be brought up from bottom rear point to the bottom of the mag well opening to give more room in the window. Like the original AR180B the way its designed right now we lost about a 1/4 inch of trigger bow. Gripping the gun ones finger naturally drops on to the trigger almost right on the tip of the trigger and running the gun a lot can get hard on the finger. See photo for an idea about what im talking about.
Lastly I would really like to see the handguard come out in a 15 maybe 17 inch straight cut version that to me would be perfect.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t6ePsh1QWv-i7Cioy11QV24tvpGOenc8/view?usp=sharing
I have run about 1K of Independence /IMI m193 and AE m855 and the gun is running nice and smooth few stove pipes with Ind/IMI but its to be expected. SPARC II reddot 50 meters about a inch or less.
The only thing that's a pain in the ass about the gun is the trigger finger opening. The geometry of the gun need to be twerked a bit the trigger window need to be squared up or the bottom of the frame needs to be brought up from bottom rear point to the bottom of the mag well opening to give more room in the window. Like the original AR180B the way its designed right now we lost about a 1/4 inch of trigger bow. Gripping the gun ones finger naturally drops on to the trigger almost right on the tip of the trigger and running the gun a lot can get hard on the finger. See photo for an idea about what im talking about.
Lastly I would really like to see the handguard come out in a 15 maybe 17 inch straight cut version that to me would be perfect.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t6ePsh1QWv-i7Cioy11QV24tvpGOenc8/view?usp=sharing
Well that’s a shame, Mr. Wolverine you had a good thing going on with that first stock. I’m quite surprised that the majority seem to give priority to looks over ergonomics and function.
Sure, the tube stock will work, but it’s always greatly beneficial to have a stock that fits properly and is finely tuned to the individuals body proportions. For any type of shooting, not just long range. You will shoot better and in more comfort!
AR optic mounts are not all the same height, something that works well for one guy may not be ideal for the next.
And length of pull, are you going to want the same in summer T shirt as when bundled up like a marshmallow coyote hunting in -40 weather? Or one guy at 5 feet tall and one at 7?
Oh well, gotta sell what the market dictates, I will wait for an adapter and likely have to buy an expensive stock.
Sure, the tube stock will work, but it’s always greatly beneficial to have a stock that fits properly and is finely tuned to the individuals body proportions. For any type of shooting, not just long range. You will shoot better and in more comfort!
AR optic mounts are not all the same height, something that works well for one guy may not be ideal for the next.
And length of pull, are you going to want the same in summer T shirt as when bundled up like a marshmallow coyote hunting in -40 weather? Or one guy at 5 feet tall and one at 7?
Oh well, gotta sell what the market dictates, I will wait for an adapter and likely have to buy an expensive stock.
How about a MCX like stock?
xdmer
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Back in Greater Vancouver
I guess I'm an outlier here on the stock design.
Northern Rockies
New member
- Location
- NT.
WK180C Zhukov Stock. Simple and cost effective, an adapter would be all thats needed.
(not the best photo shop job but you get the idea)
WK180C Zhukov Stock. Simple and cost effective, an adapter would be all thats needed.
(not the best photo shop job but you get the idea)
That works for me!!
- Status
