"magnumitis"

Status
Not open for further replies.
My god that's a monster!

The dog was there for backup. My partner was carrying the “stopper” in case things went really sour - an Anschutz in .22 Hornet. Ardent just likes to pretend he is the only one to risk life and limb chasing cantankerous beasts.
 
Sitka blacktail in devil’s club are the reason I’m building the .577. ;)

You are wise. We were going to make a video very similar to the “Death at My Feet”, “Death by the Ton” and “Death at FULL CHARGE”, but unfortunately the batteries went dead due to the salty air as we were close to the ocean.

I’m kind of torn because my cameraman - a rather large brute named Big Duane McKockiner - fainted when a particularly savage female had to be stopped with a head shot at under 10 yards. And THAT would have added some much needed comic relief to an otherwise blood curdling situation.

But on the other hand I realized that you could only tempt fate so often. That’s why I now stick to picking sea asparagus and, in the event I have that need for an adrenaline rush, digging for razor clams. Razors are REALLY sharp.

It’s better this way. I’m not sure anyone would have bought “Death by the 47 pounds” anyways.
 
You are wise. We were going to make a video very similar to the “Death at My Feet”, “Death by the Ton” and “Death at FULL CHARGE”, but unfortunately the batteries went dead due to the salty air as we were close to the ocean.

I’m kind of torn because my cameraman - a rather large brute named Big Duane McKockiner - fainted when a particularly savage female had to be stopped with a head shot at under 10 yards. And THAT would have added some much needed comic relief to an otherwise blood curdling situation.

But on the other hand I realized that you could only tempt fate so often. That’s why I now stick to picking sea asparagus and, in the event I have that need for an adrenaline rush, digging for razor clams. Razors are REALLY sharp.

It’s better this way. I’m not sure anyone would have bought “Death by the 47 pounds” anyways.

Smallish game can indeed provide sufficient adrenaline to wake you up. In Tanzania the guys tied to coax me into chasing a black mamba into the long grass; at that point I began to understand we weren't friends. 12 mph doesn't sound very fast, but when its the speed of one of the deadliest snakes in Africa, which when pressed can rear up a look you in the eye, its almost supersonic. A .500 or even a .577 isn't enough gun for those situations.
 
You are wise. We were going to make a video very similar to the “Death at My Feet”, “Death by the Ton” and “Death at FULL CHARGE”, but unfortunately the batteries went dead due to the salty air as we were close to the ocean.

I’m kind of torn because my cameraman - a rather large brute named Big Duane McKockiner - fainted when a particularly savage female had to be stopped with a head shot at under 10 yards. And THAT would have added some much needed comic relief to an otherwise blood curdling situation.

But on the other hand I realized that you could only tempt fate so often. That’s why I now stick to picking sea asparagus and, in the event I have that need for an adrenaline rush, digging for razor clams. Razors are REALLY sharp.

It’s better this way. I’m not sure anyone would have bought “Death by the 47 pounds” anyways.


How about "Death in the Devil's Club"? Marketing, man, marketing. I'd probably take a
pirated copy of that if someone gave it to me.
 
For some uses a resounding yes. It's insane that we are required to use equipment that will absolutely injure the operator. Besides the noise reduction they reduce recoil to a fraction ; like the most effective brake you ever saw. By comparison a bare barrel is barbaric.��Oo

Downsides don't amount to much. They make the rifle muzzle heavy; which could be designed around. They carbon up barrels fast and heat up quicker. Mine changed my POI 5 MOA.

Kiwis aren't immune to dumb laws though. Hunting with a suppressed AR is fine; mailing a jack-knife is illegal.

So suppressors are the cats PJ’s because they tame magnum recoil?
 
Of course it is, but not necessarily at the expense of energy delivered to the animal. Energy on target and recoil are two factors in an equation that can balance, or swing one way or the other when the variable the the shooter represents is factored in. We do a variation of the same thing even with a .30-06 figuring what weight represents the best compromise for what we’re doing.
 
So we can then agree that reducing recoil is a good thing? Excellent.

I heartily recommend it for you since you think recoil is a big deal. I'm sure you're right, for you. You'd make your 270 act like a 22/250. For myself, I already think that shooting a 270 is a lot like shooting a 22/250.

You like the .270; I get it. I'm approaching 30 years of using it myself. Still have a couple of nice Wins, plus a WSM and a couple Weatherbys. The difference is it doesn't have anything to do with recoil for me. I much prefer the last three, and vastly prefer still others, most of which kick more.

I don't think that recoil is a big deal. What a bullet does once its in the air matters, and what it does after it gets there matters.
 
Well that’s fine, but there is always a cost associated with anything. Again, I’m not anti magnum, but my experience shows that the energy you speak of is hard to see at the target. It might not be worth it in many instances. Even in Grizzly country. Those that like to hunt with magnums cary on. I see nothing wrong with it. I’ve done it many times. Those that want to hunt with something smaller go ahead. I’ve done that a bunch. After doing it both ways and everything in between I see an awful good case for the 270 and 30-06 as hunting cartridges and you could throw in the 7mm Rem Mag if you wish.
 
Recoil is relative for me. I get used to shooting a 375 off the bench when building a load. Then I do the same with my 30-06 and it feels like a gentle caress from the wife of my youth.
 
I only have 1 braked rifle and because the brake isn’t timed properly I took it off. (Bought used) Yes it works, but shooting from the bench without it just takes more concentration. Offhand I don’t mind having no brake, as long as I focus on my technique. Like running an older earthmoving machine, it works fine if you work within its limitations.
 
This is what we shoot:
300 Wby.
7mm STW
7mm Rem. Mag.
6.5-300 Wby.
270 Wby.
257 Wby.
240 Wby
We only shoot magnums, sans brake, with one exception of a 270 Win. being built at this time. The trick to shooting magnums and carrying heavy firearms is: not minding that they have heavy recoil and weight. One reason we shoot magnums is: just in case there is that 500 yard long shot, and no further.
 
Well that’s fine, but there is always a cost associated with anything. Again, I’m not anti magnum, but my experience shows that the energy you speak of is hard to see at the target. It might not be worth it in many instances. Even in Grizzly country. Those that like to hunt with magnums cary on. I see nothing wrong with it. I’ve done it many times. Those that want to hunt with something smaller go ahead. I’ve done that a bunch. After doing it both ways and everything in between I see an awful good case for the 270 and 30-06 as hunting cartridges and you could throw in the 7mm Rem Mag if you wish.

My talk of energy in the compromise is a misstep the biggest factor in a magnum for me, or with any fast cartridge including the .270, is getting the bullet accurately to the animal with enough velocity on arrival for appropriate bullet performance. Flatter trajectories and less drift do that; that’s probably long speak for “magnum” right there in the .257-375 range of cartridges. Above .375 it gets more about pure foot pounds and sounds more like the argument I made above that’s admittedly a narrow picture.

I’m with you on .270s, I enjoy shooting them more than .338s and .375s though neither of those are truly offensive in recoil, and I don’t find I’m any more accurate on a cold bore shot and follow up with the smaller rifle while hunting. Over a hundred rounds in a sitting, yea I’ll shoot the smaller gun better, but for hunting they’re equal in kill shot accuracy. Mostly I prefer carrying the .270 as it’s far lighter, and in my personal hunting that’s the most important factor. But if the .300 could be in my hands at the top of the mountain magically after carrying the 5-6lb .308 or .270 there, I’d take it. Long as I didn’t have to carry it down too.!
 
By what i have read here, so far, here is what some are saying on cartridges..

The .30-06 Springfield
The 108-year-old .30-06 Sprg. is without a doubt the king of all-around cartridges. It has been chambered in every rifle action ever designed, from single-shot to semi-automatic-even machine guns. Of military heritage, the .30-06 was the culmination of an effort to outdo the 7x57 mm Mauser that stung U.S. troops so badly during the Spanish-American War. The initial offspring-the .30-03-featured a 220-gr. round-nose bullet at 2400 fps. It had thump but not range. Three years later came the .30-06 with a 150-gr. bullet at 2900 f.p.s. Two world wars plus the Korean conflict gave several generations of soldiers and hunters a decisive performance record for the cartridge. In short, it works very well on varmints up through big game.

With 110- to 125-gr. bullets at 3200 f.p.s the .30-06 Sprg will hold its own against .22- and .24-cal. varmint rigs. Sure the dedicated varminter will perform better, especially at long range, but Mr. One Rifle won’t need to pack up his gear and wait in the truck. The 150- to 180-grainers is where this cartridge shines, and as long as you choose your bullets wisely and do your part as a shooter, the .30-06 Sprg. will handle any deer, antelope, elk or moose you care to tangle with. Bullets from 200 to 250 grains in the .30 caliber will thump hard-on both ends-but they’ll also get the job done. Longtime friend and rifle scribe Sam Fadala took a Cape buffalo with a 220-gr., .30-06, and he did so with just one shot.

The .30-06 Sprg. has been necked down to .22 caliber and necked up to .400. Ballistic twins-in terms of practicality-the .270 Win. and .280 Rem. can do just about what their pappy can. The .270 shoots a bit flatter, as does the .280, but I rather doubt there is a creature on earth that could tell the difference once hit with any of these cartridges.

7 mm Remington Magnum
Introduced 52 years ago along with the Remington 700 rifle, the 7 mm Rem. Mag. has muscled itself into the all-around cartridge tribe. The intention was to provide a cartridge that shoots flatter and hits harder than the .30-06 Sprg. and still keep recoil manageable. Bullet weights for handloaders range from the 110-grain Barnes TTSX to 190-grain Bergers. With a Barnes 110-gr. TTSX loaded to 3500 fps you can keep the marmots at bay. The 140- to 190-gr. at from 2860 to 3110 f.p.s. are the bread-and-butter bullets for most American big-game hunters. Deer, pronghorn, elk and moose are all fair game for Big Green’s Big 7.

In order to achieve those ballistics, however, the 7 mm Rem. Mag. needs a long enough barrel-26” or even 28”. Shorter and more common 24” barrels give up enough velocity and make the Big 7 a sort of loud .270 Win. on a belted case. Usually the sophisticated 7 mm Mag shooter has a custom rifle made with a longer barrel to take full advantage of the cartridge and its capabilities. Many 7 mm Mag aficionados prefer it because it provides true magnum performance with less recoil that the .300 Win. Mag.

Attempts have been made to “magnum” the 7 mm Remington Magnum-most notably the 7 mm STW and 7 mm Remington Ultra Mag-but none have been able to unseat the Big 7 from its perch as one of the great and most popular all-around cartridges. For the hair splitters, the .30 calibers tend to be slightly more accurate than the 7 mm because more effort has been put forth-especially via target shooters-to make more accurate bullets. That said, there are some custom 7s out there that can shoot rings around most of the .30s.

.300 Win. Mag.
Though neither the first .30-cal. magnum, nor the most powerful one, the .300 Win. Mag. has earned a place in the hearts of many big-game hunters worldwide. Like its older brothers-the .264, .338 and .458 Winchester Magnums-the .300 Win. is one of the first short magnums. All three cartridges came from the .375 H&H Mag. shortened so that they would fit in a standard .30-06-Sprg.-length bolt-action rifle. It offers about 9 percent more velocity than the .30-06 but nearly 30 percent more energy at the muzzle.

The .300 Win. Mag. quickly garnered a reputation as a fine deer and elk cartridge, especially out in the west where shots tend to be longer. Initially it also had a reputation as a hard-kicking and difficult to handle rifle. However, once shooters demanded a better stock design with a straight comb and little drop at the heel and they learned how to control it, the .300 Win. Mag.’s popularity soared. It is now one of the go-to cartridges for long-range sniping and 1,000-yard target shooting in addition to its longtime popularity with hunters. It is a top choice for plains game in Africa and a great choice for bear, whether black, brown or grizzly.

It gets some grief from handloaders because of its short neck, but most hunters don’t mind because of its performance in the field. Ballistic theoreticians dissed the short neck as an impediment for accuracy, but, again, the fact that the .300 Win. Mag. delivers the goods for long-range hunters, snipers and on the target range pretty well dismisses that argument.

.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
There may not be quite as many .375 H&H Magnums lounging in the racks of pickup trucks as there are .30-06s, but worldwide the cartridge remains one of the most popular ones of all time-and rightly so. Its trajectory is as flat as a .30-06, but it delivers 40 percent more energy to the target. That might not seem so big a deal if all you are shooting are antelope and deer, but if the target can either bite or stomp you back that increase in energy can be a lifesaver.

The .375 H&H Mag. is usually loaded with bullets from 200 to 300 grains, with the 235- to 270-grainers most popular. As with all of these cartridges, ammunition is usually available anywhere in the world where it is sold. In terms of need, unless you are hunting one of the larger bears-grizz or brown-the .375 H&H Mag. isn’t really needed. However, when one’s hunting adventures take them abroad and big cats or buffalo are on the menu most hunters want all the edge they can get. The .375 is one of the most popular stopper or backup rifles used by guides and professional hunters.

In rifles with well-designed stocks recoil-which many have reported as vicious in order to puff up their own egos-is quite manageable. I would probably not want to spend a day shooting prairie dogs with a .375, nor would I want a .223 Rem. in my hands if facing a Cape buffalo. On my first safari I took only a .375 and used it on everything from 140-lb. impalas to a 2,000-lb. eland. I’d call that an all-around cartridge.

Winchester Center Fire (WCF)
To round out our top five all-around sporting cartridges I chose one that has been more than just popular for 119 years. This cartridge was initially in a lever-action rifle and remains virtually synonymous with that rifle platform. Yet it, too, has been chambered in bolt actions, single shots and even drillings. A rimless version-the .30 Remington-has seen service in pump and semi-automatic rifles as well. Like the other cartridges examined here, it has been used worldwide from rabbits to elephants and pretty much everything in between. I am referring, of course, to the .30-30 Winchester Center Fire (WCF).

Often cited as the first smokeless powder cartridge, the .30-30 was actually predated a few months by its smaller sibling the .25-35 WCF. But the .30 caliber outshone the older sibling in spades. More than 7 million Model 94 Winchester rifles have been made, and the vast majority were chambered in .30-30. Other lever actions such as the Savage 99 and Mossberg’s Model 464, have been chambered for this round. Savage also made a couple of bolt actions in .30-30, the models 325 and 340.

The cartridge has been used for everything from bunnies to moose and walrus. Though sniffed at and disdained by many modern riflemen, the .30-30 is still plenty of gun for most big game when used within its 200 yard limitation. I have a cast-bullet load featuring the RCBS 150-gr. flat point in front of 15 grains of IMR Trail Boss that will consistently take the eye out of a cottontail at 25 yards. Noise and recoil is nil.

So there you have it; my five top all-around sporting cartridges. As a collector and user of rifles I’d hate to be limited to just one. But for those who prefer to be the one-gun man, any of these cartridges would serve you very well.
^written by Dave Campbell^
 
Don was one of the best defender of the 9.3x62, we had a few interesting discussions about it in Africa.

I'm sorry; you lost me. I'm just trying to think of names that might sell 47 pound blacktail videos.

Whenever I hear 9.3x 62 and Don in the same sentence I usually think Don Heath. He's dead now though.
 
Last edited:
Smallish game can indeed provide sufficient adrenaline to wake you up. In Tanzania the guys tied to coax me into chasing a black mamba into the long grass; at that point I began to understand we weren't friends. 12 mph doesn't sound very fast, but when its the speed of one of the deadliest snakes in Africa, which when pressed can rear up a look you in the eye, its almost supersonic. A .500 or even a .577 isn't enough gun for those situations.


LOL - I had a visual of that.

How about "Death in the Devil's Club"? Marketing, man, marketing. I'd probably take a
pirated copy of that if someone gave it to me.

What is your "creativity fee" if I use this title?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom