Poaching Case In Court

I’m sure no matter how this ends our PM will make an after hours appearance apologizing for land owners wrong doings and pad the pockets of the alleged trespassers
 
scott_r said:
Well if a biological male can identify legally as a women whats stopping anyone from identifying as anything you wish ?
Click to expand...

If I Happened to shoot a nice buck and tag it as a doe I wonder if I could say it was prancing around the field and it identified as a doe. You think it would hold up in court?
 
Pottst said:
If I Happened to shoot a nice buck and tag it as a doe I wonder if I could say it was prancing around the field and it identified as a doe. You think it would hold up in court?
Click to expand...

No, but, maybe if you stuck a few feathers in your azz and had the same DNA testers as Pocahontas in the states it would stand up in court!!!
 
Pottst said:
If I Happened to shoot a nice buck and tag it as a doe I wonder if I could say it was prancing around the field and it identified as a doe. You think it would hold up in court?
Click to expand...

LOL transgender deer.....
I've seen stranger things...... on tv the other day on global news vancouver some zoo somewhere has two male penguins that they tricked into fathering a chick. Now they are calling them a same ### couple and plastering on the media..... sofackingretarded what this world is coming to.
If there can be transgender penguins..... why not other animals :evil:
 
RangerPark said:
There's no offence if the land owner declines to press trespassing charges. Most land owners wouldn't be inclined to press trespassing charges for fear of having their barns and buildings burned down to the ground.
Click to expand...

Trespassing is only a provincial offense and individuals don't "press charges" in most cases anyways.
 
Come to eastern Sk, Manitoba natives cleaning out everything everywhere. They dont care just drive around and shoot anything that moves. Posted or not does not matter to them. They cannot hunt in Provincial parks in manitoba so they come to Sk with reifer trailers and fill them up. Moose mountain Park was polluted with them and by the time draw season starts its to late not many animals left around. Garbage all over where they camped its a discrace.
 
338bigdog said:
Come to eastern Sk, Manitoba natives cleaning out everything everywhere. They dont care just drive around and shoot anything that moves. Posted or not does not matter to them. They cannot hunt in Provincial parks in manitoba so they come to Sk with reifer trailers and fill them up. Moose mountain Park was polluted with them and by the time draw season starts its to late not many animals left around. Garbage all over where they camped its a discrace.
Click to expand...

Heres hoping that Manitoba opens up areas again...because you are right...they are decimating zones 56,57,58,59.

It's a damn shame what they are doing.....and SERM "makes believe" that they do not know WHY the Moose population is collapsing?

Gimme a break ..
 
45ACPKING said:
"back in the day" , indigenous people who strayed outside thier territory risked being captured and killed by other indigenous people who viewed them as trespassers. War was very common in BC native history all up and down the coast and into the interior lands. These folks had deep seeded traditions of respecting each others territory and paying the ultimate price for being caught on a neighboring groups land/territory. Originally treaties included land and harvesting rights within those lands. As part of the main condition of the treaty the bands members would cease foraging outside those lands and also cease raids on settlers in thier areas nor were they to interfere in settlers harvesting outside the treaty lands. Was a key part of the agreements.
Click to expand...

So then from this^^^, the traditional indigenous solution for the landowner would be to capture or kill the trespasser? I always suspected that this whole thing about a tradition of hunting wherever they wanted to was a scam. Certainly this whole "stewards of the Land" is a crock of crap.
 
It's been said a hundred times before, and I fully support the notion: white man's tools, then white man's rules.
They should only have increased hunting rights if they use handmade weapons using wood, stone, and sinew. On foot. No goretex either. Then they can have at'r. With rifles, trucks etc it isn't sustainable for ANYONE, FNMI groups included, to shoot whatever they wish.
 
Huntin' Gun said:
It's been said a hundred times before, and I fully support the notion: white man's tools, then white man's rules.
They should only have increased hunting rights if they use handmade weapons using wood, stone, and sinew. On foot. No goretex either. Then they can have at'r. With rifles, trucks etc it isn't sustainable for ANYONE, FNMI groups included, to shoot whatever they wish.
Click to expand...

Great post!!
 
Huntin' Gun said:
It's been said a hundred times before, and I fully support the notion: white man's tools, then white man's rules.
They should only have increased hunting rights if they use handmade weapons using wood, stone, and sinew. On foot. No goretex either. Then they can have at'r. With rifles, trucks etc it isn't sustainable for ANYONE, FNMI groups included, to shoot whatever they wish.
Click to expand...

And pit lamping tools using 1,000,000 candle power versus the old pitch burning torch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom