S&W model 19 classic

Muddy17

New member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
When can I purchase one of these, it would sit nicely next to my model 66.
Are they for sale in Canada yet, I have been looking but can’t find them yet?
 
The new MIM parts, 4.2" barrel tube with ridiculous shroud & untunable frame-mounted firing pin is just the carbon steel copy of the previously released model 66. Ugh.

If one of the gun owner organizations that are supposed to protect lawful gun owners had sued the government over the totally unconstitutional imposition of "grandfathering" some gun owners & not other gun owners, we could all own the real S&W 19's, 66's, 629's, etc.
 
Just as long as you don't end up with one like Hickok45 had. Modern day S&W quality control at it's best. :rolleyes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv9gkZsIvCo

Why I stick to Smith's that are at least 35-40 years old.;)
 
Ya I did see the Hickok show, however I love my 66 and have absolutely “0”issues with it but always thought it should be Black with the wood handle..
I also agree the original would be nicer however we have to move on as we will never get them.
Thanks for the replies and am heading over there now
 
Ya I did see the Hickok show, however I love my 66 and have absolutely “0”issues with it but always thought it should be Black with the wood handle..
I also agree the original would be nicer however we have to move on as we will never get them.
Thanks for the replies and am heading over there now

Fair enough.....getting a new gun is always fun. Hope you enjoy it.
 
I know Jerry works for S & W but his review sounds good. At 4:19 he talks about the new barrel system which according to him better than old, makes sense but whether true or not who knows not an engineer.

 
Last edited:
I'm generally pleased with my 66-8. It looks like another option for those of us that can't just buy an old 4" Model 19 and the blued finish is more attractive to my eye than stainless steel.
 
Over the years, I've had a number of Smiths in 357 Mag, both, the K frame size 19's and 66's and the N frame size 28 and 27's. With a sizeable diet of heavy loads, there've been more than a few times I've had :( 'issues' with the K frame 19's and 66's.
 
Over the years, I've had a number of Smiths in 357 Mag, both, the K frame size 19's and 66's and the N frame size 28 and 27's. With a sizeable diet of heavy loads, there've been more than a few times I've had :( 'issues' with the K frame 19's and 66's.

Yep, back in the day they used to say "practise .38spl , carry .357" about the K frames. If your thing is to shoot a steady diet of hot .357 at the range a vintage K frame is probably not the gun for you.
 
...

If one of the gun owner organizations that are supposed to protect lawful gun owners had sued the government over the totally unconstitutional imposition of "grandfathering" some gun owners & not other gun owners, we could all own the real S&W 19's, 66's, 629's, etc.

Or perhaps none of us could.
 
I shoot .38” through the week and .357” on Sunday to be sure. I have well over 2k rounds through my 66 and as I say 0 issues. I’m not a salesman or anything but my S&W revolvers are the bomb!

That said I do have an M&P for sale lol
 
I shoot .38” through the week and .357” on Sunday to be sure. I have well over 2k rounds through my 66 and as I say 0 issues. I’m not a salesman or anything but my S&W revolvers are the bomb!

That said I do have an M&P for sale lol

From what I understand the new "Classic" model 19's have different construction that renders them stronger than the original .357 K frames. That is certainly what S&W claims and is consistent with the claims made by Jerry Milculek in the video above.
 
From what I understand the new "Classic" model 19's have different construction that renders them stronger than the original .357 K frames. That is certainly what S&W claims and is consistent with the claims made by Jerry Milculek in the video above.

I am interrested in one.
 
I might be too but i think I'd have to see one in the flesh first. I'm still not convinced that today's S&W's can match the level of fit and finish of vintage Smiths when it comes to assembly, bluing, quality of the stocks etc etc

Gerry is convincing, he seem to know is stuff.
 
I might be too but i think I'd have to see one in the flesh first. I'm still not convinced that today's S&W's can match the level of fit and finish of vintage Smiths when it comes to assembly, bluing, quality of the stocks etc etc

The fit of the two piece barrels are better than the old style barrel on newer guns. Mostly because the two piece requires little skill to install properly. Also the two piece barrels have proper crowns unlike the newer one piece barrels with lopsided crowns.

The pre 1990s guns are the best hands down. But since S&W has few skilled gunsmith that give a F anymore, I would go with the two piece any day.
 
The fit of the two piece barrels are better than the old style barrel on newer guns. Mostly because the two piece requires little skill to install properly. Also the two piece barrels have proper crowns unlike the newer one piece barrels with lopsided crowns.

The pre 1990s guns are the best hands down. But since S&W has few skilled gunsmith that give a F anymore, I would go with the two piece any day.

I'd agree. All of my Colt and S&W revolvers range in production dates from 1914 to about 1982. The production methods of yesterday required highly skilled craftsmen. Even if those people were still widely available, labour costs being what they are today the resulting guns could run in the thousands (think Korth or Manurhin)

Nothing wrong at all in using modern design and production techniques to reduce costs.
 
Last edited:
From what I understand the new "Classic" model 19's have different construction that renders them stronger than the original .357 K frames. That is certainly what S&W claims and is consistent with the claims made by Jerry Milculek in the video above.

The different style of yoke provides room to eliminate the flat spot on the bottom of the barrel at the forcing cone. On the old K Frames, this was the weak point. Erosion from lots of magnum loads could weaken it to the point where the barrel would split, often cracking the frame as well. The ball detent is also a neat feature that sits in the v-notch, such that it pushes the cylinder into a more tight lockup.

What I would consider the real "golden age" for S&W revolvers is the period between when the postwar models came out and the company was sold to Bangor Punta in 1965.
 
Back
Top Bottom