That is a myth. There are “series 80” guns with great triggers and “series 70” guns with substandard triggers, and of course, vice versa. The FP mechanism has a minimal impact on trigger pull (nothing the BHP magazine safety, for example)The disadvantage of the series 80, over the 70, is the "notchy" trigger - which results from the inclusion of a "firing pin safety".
See the comment in post #3.
There may be an advantage, but none comes to mind.
If you're comfortable with the feel of the trigger on a Browning HP - which has a similar notchiness (because of the incorporation of a mag safety) - then the feel of the 80's trigger may not bother you.
I prefer a clean, crisp break.
That is a myth. There are “series 80” guns with great triggers and “series 70” guns with substandard triggers, and of course, vice versa. The FP mechanism has a minimal impact on trigger pull (nothing the BHP magazine safety, for example)
I had a Colt 1991 with a very light and crisp series 80 trigger. I could't feel the FP safety "'doing its thing" but maybe I wasn't paying attention. In any event, even if you can feel it, it doesn't increase the weight of the trigger pull by more than a couple of ounces. Every modern firearm has a firing pin safety, including high end guns like Sig P210.Myth ? - Maybe - but on every 80 I've tried, or own, I can feel the trigger block "doing it's thing" when I depress the trigger - and it bothers me enough, that I will do the FP block delete, on any 80 that I own - and that fix has always made the trigger break, cleaner. There are indeed, lots of 1911's with less than ideal trigger pulls and there may be a way to make the FP block on a Series 80, less intrusive - but the most popular way, is to get rid of it. Again, refer to post number 3.



























