Benelli MR1 M.O.A. realistic expectations

Hey I already have a sub moa bolt rifle. It's not like I'm trying to reinvent the whéel here. I'm just trying to shoot a few decent groups to find some load that'll be good enough to kill a few coyotes on the run. When I think about barrel harmonics and lightweight barrels it almost makes more sense to cut the barrel as short as legally possible. In my case that would be a last resort but it would reduce the barrel whip.
Plus, part of the whole gun nutz hobby is the challenge of making a gun shoot to its potential. Anybody can just buy an accurate gun off the shelf. Making one work takes skill, thought and patience to find its secrets.
 
Last edited:
Hey I already have a sub moa bolt rifle. It's not like I'm trying to reinvent the whéel here. I'm just trying to shoot a few decent groups to find some load that'll be good enough to kill a few coyotes on the run. When I think about barrel harmonics and lightweight barrels it almost makes more sense to cut the barrel as short as legally possible. In my case that would be a last resort but it would reduce whip.

It would also make your rifle restricted. In which case you might as well sell and go ar15 then?
 
It would also make your rifle restricted. In which case you might as well sell and go ar15 then?

You may have missed the part where he mentioned "as short as legally possible"? You can cut any barrel down, as long as it still conforms to the minimum barrel length for the category you want it to remain in.
 
I already have an AR. I wish I could hunt with it! It's not super hi buck but it's more accurate. If I could get the benelli to a 1-1/2" group I'll sell the AR and use the MR1 as dual duty for CQB and hunting coyotes with hounds.
 
I already have an AR. I wish I could hunt with it! It's not super hi buck but it's more accurate. If I could get the benelli to a 1-1/2" group I'll sell the AR and use the MR1 as dual duty for CQB and hunting coyotes with hounds.

If you try different ammo, you'll get your 1.5 MOA accuracy but do except most ammo to shoot 2-2.5 MOA!
Here is what I tried indoor and outdoor:
  • Winchester 40gr Varmint X
  • Hornady 55gr Steel Match
  • Hornady 60gr TAP FPD
  • Federal 55gr Ballistic Tip
  • Nosler 68gr Match
  • Federal 69gr Match
  • Hornady 75gr Steel Match
  • Federal 77gr Match
  • Swiss GP90

Hands down the best results were with Hornady 55gr Steel Match and Hornady 60gr TAP FPD at around 1-1.25 MOA.
I would go with Hornady 60gr TAP FPD and try to test any ammo loaded with a 60gr Nosler Ballistic Tip ammo.
(Hornady 60gr TAP is so accurate in many 1-8" and 1-9" rifles that it's unbelievable)

Alex
 
You may have missed the part where he mentioned "as short as legally possible"? You can cut any barrel down, as long as it still conforms to the minimum barrel length for the category you want it to remain in.

Unless im mistaken the mr1 nr is 20 inch. Knocking 1.4 inches off the barrel will have negligible effects on velocity or accuracy(pending it was recrowned properly) making the expense not worth it.

Alexf seems to have done a fair amount of homework on ammo it likes. With an unlined non hammer forged pencil barrel you need to accept that barrel will open up fairly quickly but you should be able to achieve the groups you want with a reasonable rate of fire.
 
Gun goes new for $1600-$2200 CAD hardly a "cheap gun"

I've been meaning to buy some decent factory ammo for my MR1 to see what it is capable of.... but so far all I shoot is UMC and Tula 62gr HP's thru it. Groups like 2-4 MOA with that ammo lol

Cheap is relative, I have a semi auto black rifle that cost $6000, and a couple others in the $3000+ range. To me cheap is something in the sub $2000 category, If I only had $1800-$2000 to spend on a rifle I'd be looking at used XCR-L's and Tavor's not brand new "cheap" rifles.

A rifle that dont group tight aint worth keeping, i never show a picture of a bad group. If a rifle cant be tamed why show it.

If you buy rifles for shooting groups and your only concern is accuracy then it's very hard to argue with your post.
But having realistic expectations is something that many on this site miss the boat on. Showing a single 1/2 moa group that you fluked off one afternoon when the rifle actually shoots 2-3 moa most of the time is not helping people get a sense of the rifles real potential. The rifles potential is what it does on average with it's favorite ammunition, not the one great group it made when the stars aligned and all the inconsistencies lined up for one nice picture.

Hey I already have a sub moa bolt rifle. It's not like I'm trying to reinvent the whéel here. I'm just trying to shoot a few decent groups to find some load that'll be good enough to kill a few coyotes on the run. When I think about barrel harmonics and lightweight barrels it almost makes more sense to cut the barrel as short as legally possible. In my case that would be a last resort but it would reduce the barrel whip.
Plus, part of the whole gun nutz hobby is the challenge of making a gun shoot to its potential. Anybody can just buy an accurate gun off the shelf. Making one work takes skill, thought and patience to find its secrets.

If all you want to do is shoot a coyote in a field this rifle is more than accurate enough for that. Either handload (try the combo I mentioned) or just buy a box of Hornady 55gr V-max factory loads and get out there. You don't need sub moa accuracy to shoot coyotes unless you're shooting at them at 500 yards, in which case you should be using your bolt action and something that shoots a cartridge that has a little more power.

Don't cut your barrel, it won't help. An inch and a half off the end is not going to reduce barrel harmonics enough to see any change in accuracy. If this rifle doesn't perform to your requirements just sell it and buy something better. If you can't find ammo it likes nothing short of a barrel transplant with a $400+ barrel is going to make enough difference to be worth while.

I have to agree with this gent, 2K is entry level in the precision world, buy a 3K rifle mount at 4K S&B or else plus the work, 7K is easily reached.

Exactly, I have scopes that cost more than this rifle.


Shooting sub moa is hard even with my Modern Hunter with handloads tailored to the rifle and a Proof Research carbon wrapped barrel and a Nightforce sitting on top of it.

That's another thing a lot of guys don't understand. Even if the rifle is capable of 1 moa or better and even if you find the ammo it likes making it possible to shoot those tiny groups it is not easy to consistently shoot 1 moa or better. It takes a lot of skill to do it right every time to make that pretty group you want to post on here. I've been shooting a long time and I've owned more quality AR's than I can remember, a few of them were capable of shooting very tiny groups but some days I just couldn't do it. Same ammo, same rifle, same scope, same bench, same rest, and different results, that's operator error and even with sandbags or a lead sled there is still an element of human error.

I like to ask the guys I think have unrealistic expectations, how many sub moa groups have you ever shot in your life? I'm talking 5 shot groups at 100 or more yards counting fliers, no excuses just results.
No one has answered me and I know why.
 
Last edited:
Cheap is relative, I have a semi auto black rifle that cost $6000, and a couple others in the $3000+ range. To me cheap is something in the sub $2000 category, If I only had $1800-$2000 to spend on a rifle I'd be looking at used XCR-L's and Tavor's not brand new "cheap" rifles.

I have to agree with this gent, 2K is entry level in the precision world, buy a 3K rifle mount at 4K S&B or else plus the work, 7K is easily reached.
 
It's.definitely one of the cheaper NR stanag mag semiautos available in Canada.

With the way the wind is blowing in Canada my preference is towards NR rifles versus Restricted rifles.

I had Dlask cut my barrel 1.5" and threaded it 1/2 × 28. Totally legal but mostly cosmetic as the flash hides add the length back on to the barrel.
 
It's.definitely one of the cheaper NR stanag mag semiautos available in Canada.

With the way the wind is blowing in Canada my preference is towards NR rifles versus Restricted rifles.

I had Dlask cut my barrel 1.5" and threaded it 1/2 × 28. Totally legal but mostly cosmetic as the flash hides add the length back on to the barrel.

I prefer NR as well but it's good to make sure we all still own restricted rifles and pistols. Don't give up before they even try to take them away. If we do we're just making it easy for them.
Make a liberal cry uncontrollably, buy an AR-15 :p
 
I prefer NR as well but it's good to make sure we all still own restricted rifles and pistols. Don't give up before they even try to take them away. If we do we're just making it easy for them.
Make a liberal cry uncontrollably, buy an AR-15 :p

I agree and have a cheap AR but since I like to know that if I need to I can throw my rifle behind the seat of my truck and go anywhere, it's got to be NR.
 
I agree and have a cheap AR but since I like to know that if I need to I can throw my rifle behind the seat of my truck and go anywhere, it's got to be NR.

Yup, I've sold off most of my restricted stuff, only two AR's and four pistols left.
I think I have seven NR semi's, can't remember, lol. First world problems :p
 
Cheap is relative, I have a semi auto black rifle that cost $6000, and a couple others in the $3000+ range. To me cheap is something in the sub $2000 category, If I only had $1800-$2000 to spend on a rifle I'd be looking at used XCR-L's and Tavor's not brand new "cheap" rifles.



If you buy rifles for shooting groups and your only concern is accuracy then it's very hard to argue with your post.
But having realistic expectations is something that many on this site miss the boat on. Showing a single 1/2 moa group that you fluked off one afternoon when the rifle actually shoots 2-3 moa most of the time is not helping people get a sense of the rifles real potential. The rifles potential is what it does on average with it's favorite ammunition, not the one great group it made when the stars aligned and all the inconsistencies lined up for one nice picture.



If all you want to do is shoot a coyote in a field this rifle is more than accurate enough for that. Either handload (try the combo I mentioned) or just buy a box of Hornady 55gr V-max factory loads and get out there. You don't need sub moa accuracy to shoot coyotes unless you're shooting at them at 500 yards, in which case you should be using your bolt action and something that shoots a cartridge that has a little more power.

Don't cut your barrel, it won't help. An inch and a half off the end is not going to reduce barrel harmonics enough to see any change in accuracy. If this rifle doesn't perform to your requirements just sell it and buy something better. If you can't find ammo it likes nothing short of a barrel transplant with a $400+ barrel is going to make enough difference to be worth while.



Exactly, I have scopes that cost more than this rifle.


Shooting sub moa is hard even with my Modern Hunter with handloads tailored to the rifle and a Proof Research carbon wrapped barrel and a Nightforce sitting on top of it.

That's another thing a lot of guys don't understand. Even if the rifle is capable of 1 moa or better and even if you find the ammo it likes making it possible to shoot those tiny groups it is not easy to consistently shoot 1 moa or better. It takes a lot of skill to do it right every time to make that pretty group you want to post on here. I've been shooting a long time and I've owned more quality AR's than I can remember, a few of them were capable of shooting very tiny groups but some days I just couldn't do it. Same ammo, same rifle, same scope, same bench, same rest, and different results, that's operator error and even with sandbags or a lead sled there is still an element of human error.

I like to ask the guys I think have unrealistic expectations, how many sub moa groups have you ever shot in your life? I'm talking 5 shot groups at 100 or more yards counting fliers, no excuses just results.
No one has answered me and I know why.

With a good bolt action, a good scope, a rest and good ammo honest 5 shot smaller than 1" groups at 100 yards are common.
With a good semi, a good scope, a rest and good ammo honest 5 shot smaller than 1.5-2" groups at 100 yards are common!

My rule of thumb is pretty simple, what a Tikka T3 can do with a given cartridge, a semi will struggle to do at half the range ;)
(Okay I'm exaggerating but this is much closer to reality than most shooters think)

Alex
 
With a good bolt action, a good scope, a rest and good ammo honest 5 shot smaller than 1" groups at 100 yards are common.
With a good semi, a good scope, a rest and good ammo honest 5 shot smaller than 1.5-2" groups at 100 yards are common!

My rule of thumb is pretty simple, what a Tikka T3 can do with a given cartridge, a semi will struggle to do at half the range ;)
(Okay I'm exaggerating but this is much closer to reality than most shooters think)

Alex

The reason your semi doesn't shoot as well as your Tikka is not that it's a semi, it's because your semi has a crappy barrel and depending which rifle it is it may have a poor design that does not lend itself to accurate shooting. I own or have owned a few semis that could easily out shoot my Rem 700 7-08, but they had a barrel that cost as much as the whole Rem 700 did.

Most guys don't realize that these and almost all the non restricted semi auto options we have available are not what a knowledgeable precision shooter would consider having a good barrel even if you go up into the $3000 semis. You pay for the rifle and that does not have any correlation to it's accuracy potential. If you want a quality barrel that's truly capable of moa or better you need a barrel that cost $400+ which drives the price of the rifles up out of reach of many, especially if it's something a gunsmith has to do for you. My ACR has a $500 stainless barrel and even with quality factory ammo it's hard to shoot 1 moa and I haven't spent the time needed to find a good handload yet. My 300BLK conversion is a custom made $500+ barrel and with my handloads it will shoot about 0.85 moa.
If you're shooting rifles like a Tavor or XCR you are probably never going to see a consistent 1 moa no matter what you do or what ammo you try. They just aren't designed with accuracy in mind. These are civilian versions of a military battle rifle so less than 4 moa is all the design needed to be capable of. Reliability was the #1 priority, not shooting at paper targets and posting pics on CGN.

If someone really wants a non restricted semi that can consistently shoot 1 moa or better the only options I can think of right now are to buy an HK SL8, a Bushmaster ACR with a quality aftermarket barrel, or build an ATRS MS or MDI SLR and use a good barrel. The SL8 will be the cheapest option, I've owned three of them over the years and they are capable of 1 moa if you use quality ammo that the barrel likes. The ACR will run you close to $3000 by the time you're done or find one for sale that has the barrel you want. The MS and SLR I think are the best choices right now, they allow you to buy a good barrel and if funds are tight you can skimp in other areas and still end up making nice groups and just swap out the cheap parts for better ones later after saving up some more. It's still going to be a $2000 build for a cheap one and could go as high as $4000+ if you really want it to have all the good stuff.

And as you mentioned a quality optic and rest factor in as well. I've seen a lot of groups posted where the guy was using a dot sight or not using a rear bag or whatever and it means absolutely nothing and tells you nothing about the rifle.
If you want to shoot tight groups you need an optic that has glass that is clear enough that you can see the target nicely and has a fine enough reticle that you can actually aim at a tiny spot on the target. If you look through a Bushnell and then through my Nightforce or any of my other higher end optics the difference is immediately obvious. When I bought my first Sightron I couldn't stand looking through any of my cheap scopes any more so I sold them all, I have now become an optics snob even though I can't afford the scopes I really want.
And of course there are guys out there that can probably outshoot me with them using irons and me using a scope but in general on average most people limit their potential by cheaping out on their glass.
 
Last edited:
You dont need an expensive scope to shoot MOA. Most of my fathers basic hunting rifles with sub$ 500 dollar scopes mounted will shoot MOA or under with 3 shot hunting groups.

I think more often then not, if a semi auto ain't accurate, it isnt because it has a cheap barrel. I've seen $400 savage bolt rifles group MOA and how much would their barrel cost ? lol like mentioned its probably going to be its design that causes the inaccuracy.
 
You dont need an expensive scope to shoot MOA. Most of my fathers basic hunting rifles with sub$ 500 dollar scopes mounted will shoot MOA or under with 3 shot hunting groups.

I think more often then not, if a semi auto ain't accurate, it isnt because it has a cheap barrel. I've seen $400 savage bolt rifles group MOA and how much would their barrel cost ? lol like mentioned its probably going to be its design that causes the inaccuracy.

It's a tolerance stacking of mediocore to cheap barrel, crappy glass, occassionally good ammo, and less than stellar marksman.
 
You dont need an expensive scope to shoot MOA. Most of my fathers basic hunting rifles with sub$ 500 dollar scopes mounted will shoot MOA or under with 3 shot hunting groups.

I think more often then not, if a semi auto ain't accurate, it isnt because it has a cheap barrel. I've seen $400 savage bolt rifles group MOA and how much would their barrel cost ? lol like mentioned its probably going to be its design that causes the inaccuracy.

It's a tolerance stacking of mediocore to cheap barrel, crappy glass, occassionally good ammo, and less than stellar marksman.
 
It's a tolerance stacking of mediocore to cheap barrel, crappy glass, occassionally good ammo, and less than stellar marksman.

Pretty sure you could press a $3000 barrel into a Type 81 SA, mount a 25 power nightforce optic, feed it Hornady SST ammo and have Quigley down under pull the trigger and it would STILL SHOOT 5 MOA lol
 
Back
Top Bottom