Ruger PC 9 carbine issue

Because it's wrong. I guess proper names and facts aren't important to you and others.
Get a life
Don’t you have something better to do than being a correctness nazi. This is a gun forum where the most people don’t let little things bother them like correct word of a gun. If it bothers you that much maybe you should just move on.
 
Get a life
Don’t you have something better to do than being a correctness nazi. This is a gun forum where the most people don’t let little things bother them like correct word of a gun. If it bothers you that much maybe you should just move on.

Perhaps some should strive to be more educated and accountable? Why the resistance to learn to use proper names and nomenclature?
 
I don't think anyone is arguing about the fact that the old model designation was PC9 and the new takedown is called a PCC.

Most of us seem to be able to follow along with current threads mislabeled PC9...... looks like Ruger might have created a clipazine type
s h i t storm.


It should get less confusing when they release the PC10..... :)
 
Show the chink in you armour and the piranhas will pick at it! hahaha PC9PC9PC9


I've done the conversion on 2 PC Carbines. Almost take the screws right out. The cross bolt safety must be in the middle and the action drops right out. No hammer required.
 
Don't think there was aPCC9 so how could there be a PCC10:)
But there was/is a PC9 so the next should be a PC10 :)
Just having some fun with logic and not the kind that makes your head spin (ladder logic)
PC9 also has no magazine adapter ala the PCC so there.
Me, I'd like to try a PCC in .40 or even the big guy .44 Rem Mag but the rim would be a hurdle to solve
 
Back
Top Bottom