Thanks very much for posting on this topic but none of this is new information. There is nothing to correct; other than it was not the CBSA that appealed any decisions (now to be fair, I have not seen any evidence of this - if you have any documentation that shows otherwise, I think we'd all be very eager to see it). This situation is fairly well documented. A particular CBSA officer ruled that a knife (a Kershaw Skyline assisted opening pocket knife) to be prohibited, the Individual who's knife was seized appealed this decision and that appeal went to the CITT, which is how these things are handled.
The CITT subsequently supported the CBSA's position that these types of knives are "prohibited weapons" and here we are.
but to be certain, this all started with the CBSA deciding that a style of knife, that police forces and courts across this country have all said is not prohibited, was a "prohibited weapon". so it is very much a problem that originated with the CBSA.
Please donate to the pending court challenge and help fight the good fight!