I posted this in another thread but then realized it was probably better here.
I have an rPAL and own a few handguns. I also have a few semi-auto long guns (carbine and shotgun). My question is about the restricted AR-15 types. I am actually not particularly interested in this type of firearm at the moment but don't want to be shutout from owning one in the future. It appears that some people are positioning themselves to be able to be "grandfathered" in case the legislation changes as it has done in the past. Good plan and something I want to do too. I'm a little unclear on this idea of buying a "stripped lower". I understand that the lower is the serialized part of the firearm. So I buy one and then later could add the rest of the parts and build up a complete firearm, presumably because the rest of the parts are not restricted and readily available.
So my questions are these: is any AR15 lower basically 100% compatible with the parts needed to complete the firearm or is there some differences in the lowers that would tie you into a particular manufacturer or design? Is there any difference in the lowers in quality or reliablilty that would make me choose one over the other?
I think the expectation from some is that the anticipated grandfathering will mean that if you own one you will be able to buy others or at least buy the parts to complete the lower you already have registered.
Could someone please post a few sources for the stripped lowers and some comments about the reason for choosing one over the other, if any? My research leads me to think that I'd want to get something like a Stag 10 but that is considered to be non-reg. That's good but doesn't position me to grandfathered if that situation occurs. So, I want to buy something in the restricted class that will put me in the anticipated grandfathered group relatively inexpensively but not waste my money on something that isn't good-quality when I decide to buy the parts to complete it.
Thanks
I have an rPAL and own a few handguns. I also have a few semi-auto long guns (carbine and shotgun). My question is about the restricted AR-15 types. I am actually not particularly interested in this type of firearm at the moment but don't want to be shutout from owning one in the future. It appears that some people are positioning themselves to be able to be "grandfathered" in case the legislation changes as it has done in the past. Good plan and something I want to do too. I'm a little unclear on this idea of buying a "stripped lower". I understand that the lower is the serialized part of the firearm. So I buy one and then later could add the rest of the parts and build up a complete firearm, presumably because the rest of the parts are not restricted and readily available.
So my questions are these: is any AR15 lower basically 100% compatible with the parts needed to complete the firearm or is there some differences in the lowers that would tie you into a particular manufacturer or design? Is there any difference in the lowers in quality or reliablilty that would make me choose one over the other?
I think the expectation from some is that the anticipated grandfathering will mean that if you own one you will be able to buy others or at least buy the parts to complete the lower you already have registered.
Could someone please post a few sources for the stripped lowers and some comments about the reason for choosing one over the other, if any? My research leads me to think that I'd want to get something like a Stag 10 but that is considered to be non-reg. That's good but doesn't position me to grandfathered if that situation occurs. So, I want to buy something in the restricted class that will put me in the anticipated grandfathered group relatively inexpensively but not waste my money on something that isn't good-quality when I decide to buy the parts to complete it.
Thanks



















































