It looks like a fully ambidextrous, prettied up, Beretta ARX. I would pay lots of shekels for it.First you create the styling.
Then you design the mechanicals.
Then, you count the shekels.
With a name like that you know it's going to be an awesome rifle.
It looks like a fully ambidextrous, prettied up, Beretta ARX. I would pay lots of shekels for it.
It looks like a fully ambidextrous, prettied up, Beretta ARX. I would pay lots of shekels for it.
Prettied up kinda. Arx was already ambi...
This has a dust cover while the g36, scar, arx does not. That is a win in my books.
With a name like that you know it's going to be an awesome rifle.
There is no ingress for foreign matter at the G36's Ejection Port. The steel Bolt Carrier forms a seal with the polymer Receiver walls such that a Dust Cover would be redundant. I cannot speak to the SCAR as I have never taken the time to look when handling one. However I figure that if the SCAR needed a $.50 plastic Dust Cover to enhance reliability, the designers would have given it one. The same line of reasoning applies to the Bushmaster ACR's lack of a Dust Cover.
I’d take an AR any day of the week. More specifically, a SIG MCX.
That thing looks like someone was trying to solve a problem nobody had.
My guess it that IWI received a lot of requests for a conventional layout modern rifle, and they designed one that's suitable for production on their Tavor tooling?



























