McMillan is so much easier. And nicer. But a bit more money. But time is money.
I have two wildcats. And even if the McMillans weigh a bit more, they feel better to me.
This is the route I've gone multiple times. Never been disappointed!
McMillan is so much easier. And nicer. But a bit more money. But time is money.
I have two wildcats. And even if the McMillans weigh a bit more, they feel better to me.
Our hunting is confined to daylight hours, so the scope requirements here are quite different that that of you neck of the wood and Germany.
Most here (not all) when building a LW rifle, will consider all the components pkg to make a very light over all weight. Remington started the "mountain rifle" craze years ago which has been very popular among shooters with many companies offering uber light guns and/or custom guns that will shave every extra oz. This will include the scope and mounts as well. Some of those rifles are crazy light. I like mine not lighter than 6.5bs scoped, but most I own are a 7-7.5lbs.
I have had no trouble using a 32mm scope or smaller which would work fine for the vast majority of the hunting here. Many do use a larger scope for a LR rifle, but those are not usually LW anyways.
The extreme light mountain rifle often had flaws, I had built myself sporter barrelled rifles with 20" barrel 20OZ carbon stock and also had a 32mm scope but especially when going into the hills the shots are longer and this type of set up is not the best. Great for walking.. not so great for the longer shot. For certain applications it was perfect just not an all rounder.
Either way, building an extreme light weight mountain rifle or a something with better range capability right up to a full blown tactical rig.... nothing changes, you save just as much weight with either build if you go carbon vs wood/alu.
The extreme light mountain rifle often had flaws, I had built myself sporter barrelled rifles with 20" barrel 20OZ carbon stock and also had a 32mm scope but especially when going into the hills the shots are longer and this type of set up is not the best. Great for walking.. not so great for the longer shot. For certain applications it was perfect just not an allrounder. Recon it depends a lot on how, when and where you shoot. When I go into our hills now I take a lightweight tactical rifle, go on my own and pace myself. Coming back with the meat of a deer in the Rucksack is the bigger issue. Then again we mostly only do half day stints into the low'ish hills.
![]()
edi
If anyone has more to add please feel free !
Thank You
Leavenworth
I just found out that Magpul makes a stock for a 700 long action . Has anyone installed one on a Remington 700 long action ? Pros/Cons ?
Has an aluminium bedding block . Would think that this option would make my 700 more accurate than the current setup with the Factory Classic Wood Stock ? Thoughts
Thanks !
Leavenworth
How much do they weigh?
Supercub From their website https://www.magpul.com/products/hunter-700-la-stock-remington-700-long-action
Leavenworth
That’s whatI’m thinking but I hope someone onehere can let me know if they have done this and the results !Looks way cool. You need that.
If you are thinking of going with a Mcmillan - they have a sale on right now for a drop in ready Hunters Edge stock, BDL floor plate, long or short action $499 USD
Yup ..... OP states he wants a LW stock and leans towards that boat anchor despite all the good advice otherwise.51.2 oz for the Magpul... no thanks!!!!
Your bang on lot’s of great advice given and appreciated ! Did not realize the weight of the Magpul .Yup ..... OP states he wants a LW stock and leans towards that boat anchor despite all the good advice otherwise.