This morning I got joed into going along with a friend our LGS to examine a Ross rifle in .303 British. Turned out to be a MkIIIB with the simplified back sight, and externally was in pretty fine fettle for a hundred-year-old rifle. However, the inside was another matter, as the bore was pretty much shot to **** from the breech/chamber to a point about a foot from the muzzle - in fact, I have NEVER in my life seen such an appalling barrel on anything, and that includes guns from Nepal that looked like they'd been stacked underwater. I have one of these spiffy little App-driven endoscopes that will happily go down even a 6.5 bore, but sending it down from the muzzle, it stopped dead, as I noted, about foot down the bore, where the metallic rust growths began - just like on an old ship where, I bleeve, the are called rusticles.
What a crying shame it was for both of us - him because he had seen the photos and got his interest up, and having a spare .303 spot on his FAC, could have bought it there and then, and me, because I'd talked him into a Ross in the first place.
Now the crunch - the vendor wanted £2000 for this piece. Today, that's just over CAD$3400...
So why do we see so many Ross rifles with appalling and unshootable bores?
What a crying shame it was for both of us - him because he had seen the photos and got his interest up, and having a spare .303 spot on his FAC, could have bought it there and then, and me, because I'd talked him into a Ross in the first place.
Now the crunch - the vendor wanted £2000 for this piece. Today, that's just over CAD$3400...
So why do we see so many Ross rifles with appalling and unshootable bores?


















































