I was going to pick up a tikka untill I found out they didn't take t3 rings or bases.... I would take a regular ruger American over the rpr.
Another vote for the Tikka. I have one with a 16” barrel and it shoots less than 1/2” groups at 50 yards all day using cheap CCI stand velocity ammo. I own a few Tikka rifles and have never been disappointed. Lots of options out there for scope bases. I have a Area 419 20MOA base on mine as I shoot it out past 200 yards.
I went with the Ruger. Nothing else can be attached to my tripod with a $50 arca rail. Having a hoard of magazines and not having to drop over $600 on a Bravo to do what I want made the price difference no contest. If I just wanted to shoot off bags or a bipod I would have gone CZ or Tikka.
How do you like the spigot mount?
I hunt with a tikka t3 6.5x55, so I am kinda favouring the Tikka but the Ruger seems like it could be a fun little .22 as well. We currently own a pair of 10-22's with about 20k though them. My spare change bucket is sitting close enough to buy either of them and I have enough scopes to put a decent one on it. Something in the range of a bushnell 3500 / burris fullfield II / Vortex viper.
I want to shoot small things at up to 100 yards, kill some gophers and shoot grouse in the bean. I'm kinda torn because I think the Tikka might shoot better but the Ruger looks cooler, if that matters.
Which gun could consistently shoot golf balls at 100 yards with a decent enough scope?
Thanks everyone.
Ryan