I may be naive but what’s the difference between banning a certain rifle vs making it prohibited?
Remember folks, without the cops to enforce this BS it doesn't mean a thing.
just doing their job and all that ...
So who's the REAL enemy ?
Police for the most part do not agree with Liberals gun ban. Many current and past chiefs of police all say that banning guns is not the answer. With the exception of that idiot Bill Blair who is a puppet and a patsy!!
The money that will be allocated to a ban of legal property should go to police forces and the judiciary to go after the loser criminals who actually are the cause of all this... they ARE the enemy and the Libs are using then to get this through by scaring the #### out of a mostly ignorant population.
"GANG-VIOLENCE" NOT "GUN-VIOLENCE"
Liberals and libbie media are manipulating the language to take attention away from the fact that it's the gang-war that is killing people in Toronto. They say "gun-violence" to evoke images of American mass shootings. Sane people have pointed out that banning guns would do nothing to stop gang-violence - all their guns are illegal already.
Should we get to that point, what do you think will be the policy on face paint?
He is going to be elected right now!
Why are you stating what is not the case?
It is your intention that people pay no attention and don't vote when the Liberals are going to be the majority or minority government.
As of today
36%Probability of the Liberals winning a majority
27%Probability of the Liberals winning the most seats but not a majority
25%Probability of the Conservatives winning the most seats but not a majority
12%Probability of the Conservatives winning a majority
How does Trudeau buy back something that was never his in the first place? Best of all it's our money, so we'll be paying twice for the same gun only we don't get to keep the gun. Umm, uh No thanks.
Well, for all you talking about donations... i went out door knocking with my local candidate today, this is the election to actually get out and volunteer.
Because lets be honest, this announcement is not a shot across the bow, its a full broadside.
I live in a rural riding in Central Ontario. Our liberal candidate was just at my door. She gave me a couple pamphlets and I asked about her thoughts on the potential ban on AR-15 based rifles. She stated that no one needed a "weapon" that could fire hundreds of shots without reloading! I asked her how many rds a civilian AR type rifle was capable of holding. No idea! My answer 5. I then asked how many shootings in Canada involved AR type rifles. She had no idea and I don't know either but I would assume not many if any.
She asked for her pamphlets back and left.
I am not an AR owner and do not have much interest. I do have friends who own them and they shoot regularly at our club. My son served in the CAF for 10 years including Afghanistan. The only rifle he is interested in owning for target shooting is an AR .
Thanks for your service Peter but you obviously shouldn't be trusted to shoot a few paper targets once in awhile at our local club.
It is illegal to possess any kind of firearms in Mexico but why all the killings down there are mostly involved with firearms? The Liberals and NDP should go and consult their amigo "EL CHAPO" now in US prison and find out if he will agree total firearms ban will stop gun violence on street.
For the record, NZ reports $27,000,000 paid out to buy-back 15,000 guns. That's an average of $1800 per gun.
If the libs were to apply the same formula for the 75,000 ARs currently registered, that's $135,000,000. And that's strictly AR-15s, not any other kind of self-loader whether restricted or not.
To claim this program would cost $60M is either naive or outright deceptive. Such a program in Canada would easily be pushing a half-billion dollars.
For the record, NZ reports $27,000,000 paid out to buy-back 15,000 guns. That's an average of $1800 per gun.
If the libs were to apply the same formula for the 75,000 ARs currently registered, that's $135,000,000. And that's strictly AR-15s, not any other kind of self-loader whether restricted or not.
To claim this program would cost $60M is either naive or outright deceptive. Such a program in Canada would easily be pushing a half-billion dollars.
I agree. Half a billion at least. You’re just factoring the price of the gun. What about the resources that would be required to plan, set up and man such a program.




























