Ruger pc9 charger pistol

If they offered the barrel separate that would be cool. If you already got the 18" version, just swap barrels and have a different firearm

Couple videos on youtube already
 
OAL = 16 1/2" with a 6 1/2" barrel.

so that would make it restricted due to the OAL being under 26".

Any non-prohibited semi-automatic centrefire rifle with a barrel length of less than 470 mm (18.5 inches).
Any firearm that can be fired when it can be reduced by folding, telescopic stock, etc. to an overall length of less than 660 mm (26 inches).
Click to expand...

but id buy the pistol, would sit in the safe beside my 10/22 charger to keep it company.
 
wayupnorth said:
OAL = 16 1/2" with a 6 1/2" barrel.

so that would make it restricted due to the OAL being under 26"
Click to expand...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but , OAL doesn't play into this being restricted, same same as the 1022 charger , once classed as a pistol, forever a pistol.

On another note, I see Magpul is coming out with a 50 round drum mag for use in glock mag fed rifles , but can't be used in a glock pistol.
 
wayupnorth said:
OAL = 16 1/2" with a 6 1/2" barrel.

so that would make it restricted due to the OAL being under 26".

but id buy the pistol, would sit in the safe beside my 10/22 charger to keep it company.
Click to expand...

It’s a semi-auto, needs a 18.5” barrel to be NR, OAL usually isn’t relevant as the barrel and action are over 26” in most cases.
 
Greenhorse six said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but , OAL doesn't play into this being restricted, same same as the 1022 charger , once classed as a pistol, forever a pistol.

On another note, I see Magpul is coming out with a 50 round drum mag for use in glock mag fed rifles , but can't be used in a glock pistol.
Click to expand...

Someone earlier had said they hoped it would be NR but have since changed their post.
I was just pointing out there was no way this would be NR.
 
Greenhorse six said:
Want .
I'm okay with it being restricted, but , It'd be great if they didn't classify it as a pistol .
Click to expand...

I don’t think it matters if it’s classified as a pistol. Still will be restricted wich is ok with me as I have the non restricted ones. This would be nice with a side folder. It will give competition to the B&T, scorpion Evo, etc.
 
pc9 said:
I don’t think it matters if it’s classified as a pistol. Still will be restricted wich is ok with me as I have the non restricted ones. This would be nice with a side folder. It will give competition to the B&T, scorpion Evo, etc.
Click to expand...
True, I want one , and will get one eventually, but , unlike some guns , that are restricted due to OAL , which can be reclassified to non restricted with a longer barrel, the Charger receiver , being classified as a pistol, can never be non restricted, like the longer barreled Carbine Ruger PC.
 
i wonder what the price of it will be with our dollar dropping by the day.
all in with a folding stock.
id imagine we are gonna be looking $1000 which im not sure if im a fan of that price.
$700 id pick one up in a heart beat.
$800 id get one but i would be grumbling about it.
$900 id have to be pretty damn drunk or come into some money.
 
wayupnorth said:
i wonder what the price of it will be with our dollar dropping by the day.
all in with a folding stock.
id imagine we are gonna be looking $1000 which im not sure if im a fan of that price.
$700 id pick one up in a heart beat.
$800 id get one but i would be grumbling about it.
$900 id have to be pretty damn drunk or come into some money.
Click to expand...
Lol
My thoughts as well;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom