More details from the Globe and Mail

4b3b4d274b54d0cf5b29ccd522fc391a.jpg
 
Last edited:
They said 1500 types of firearms will be banned elsewhere, WTF is wrong with you saying this ain’t so bad based on just a provisional list from the Globe&Mail?
Even the “full” list from The Gazette can and, most likely, will be expanded at some point.

So, are we planning any rallies and protests at all?
 
I had a long talk with the residents of my guns safes. They feel vilified and are outraged. They have self identified as BB guns and dont want to discriminated against based on their appearance. I, for one, respect their feelings regardless of what others may think of them.
 
We need to do something as a community. I speak on behalf of my company and we would support any rally or protest. If they where able to do so in the states there has to be a way to do something similar here.
 
Bobbum Man said:
I had a long talk with the residents of my guns safes. They feel vilified and are outraged. They have self identified as BB guns and dont want to discriminated against based on their appearance. I, for one, respect their feelings regardless of what others may think of them.
Click to expand...

For the win!
 
im not sure what people are talking about "grandfathered in" no where int he law does it mean allowing for grandaftaher in. Only those who rely on it for hunt to sustain themselves.
 
Yes keep us posted if this happens. I have as much time to protest as a Liberal right now do to the fact they where a little slow on closing the boarder.
 
Bagels said:
im not sure what people are talking about "grandfathered in" no where int he law does it mean allowing for grandaftaher in. Only those who rely on it for hunt to sustain themselves.
Click to expand...

"During the amnesty period, the Government intends to
implement a buy-back program to compensate affected
owners for the value of their firearms after they are delivered
to a police officer; however, until a buy-back program
is offered, affected owners will not be eligible for compensation.
An option to participate in a grandfathering regime
would also be made available for affected owners. Further
public communications on the buy-back program and the
grandfathering regime will follow later."

Mentioned 4 or 5 times in the Canada Gazette article which is the specific changes to the law they have ordered.
 
FatMango said:
WE aernt the problem. Aernt YOU people mean to serve and protect US?
Click to expand...

Security institutions are meant to serve the People of Canada, not individuals, and therefore take lawful direction from the democratically elected government. Most Canadians, unfortunately, support an "assault weapons" (dumb term) ban and provided the government a mandate to impose such a restriction during the last election. You can argue about minority governments, electoral process, etc but 4/5 (Liberal, NDP, Bloc, & Green) federal parties sitting in Parliament, if a debate were held today, support this. We would lose democratically.

Security institutions are duty bound to uphold democratic will. Unfortunately, in this case, the will of the majority opposes our cause placing us on the losing end. It sucks, no doubt. It's illogical and won't prevent violent crime. I don't agree with it personally, however, I can have civil dialogue and eventually accept the will of the majority. It's the social convention we live by, by living in Canada.

Look in this thread and it's easy to see why the majority don't want AR-15's kicking around. You have the Moron Labe crowd advocating armed resistance and in one case, civil war. WTF! Dude clearly has never been to a conflict zone or applied violence against other human beings....you don't even think about bringing that #### into this country. So for every 10,000 civil, nice to be around, "assault weapon" owners capable of honest debate, you get one retard like that and it destroys the image of all. Unfortunately these same guys are the ones with wet-dreams of societal collapse and a survivalist reality.
 
domaindetente said:
Full Document: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yR1lsC7zncM7bQNFisW5Hxv68OIVtlVX/view?usp=sharing
Click to expand...
Thanks for posting. Read it all. The last paragraph is telling:

“ There is also a risk that affected firearms owners may elect to replace their firearms with models unaffected by the ban, causing a market displacement. This risk may be mitigated by adding additional makes and models to the list of prohibited firearms in the future.”

This is wrong and enraging on so many levels. It nullifies all the preceding BS about public safety and reveals the true agenda.
 
BCreserveMP said:
Yet FN individuals are allowed certain exemptions of this ban.

I find it amusing (but not surprising) the government calls this a victory for feminism. I'm sure female shooters are overjoyed. I'm sure women at risk from estranged partners are elated to have their guns taken away. Literally disempowering women, and forcing them to rely on the police to rescue them. Yay, feminism.
Click to expand...

That is indeed bull####. Men have a natural physical advantage over women. Taking guns away just puts us back on unequal footing again.
 
So, hypothetically speaking of course, if one was to own a $9700 PGWDTI LRT3, and. $3500 worth of dies and 50 cal specific presses and multiple thousands of dollars worth of brass, powder and projectiles what would said individual receive in $$ in dip ####s “ buy back” program.

Man I’m glad I’m not him....
 
“I felt a great disturbance in the Force. As if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.” — Obi-Wan Kenobi, this is exactly what happened over the last four months it’s a shame that people and their family’s should have to potentially lose their lively hoods just because another group of people don’t understand and or want to understand said people’s passion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom