Historical Question on Service Use of Lever Action Rifles

Geppetto

Regular
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
This question is out of historical curiosity and I've been wondering about it for ages now. Thought some more knowledgeable members might be able to educate me.

Would anyone happen to know if any lever action rifles were used in military service during either World War I or World War II and if so, which models and which countries? Any book recommendations would be great too. I always found it curious that they seem to have been used commonly in North America, and I'm sure I've seen references to them being used in the US punitive expedition to Mexico, but I've never seen any references to the two world wars.

Cheers!
 
I know the Russians had some sort of lever action in the x54R round in ww1. Some research would yield you more in depth knowledge than I'm able to recall.

Just took a look, Winchester 1895 in 7.62x54R.
 
Many thanks I'll take a look! I admit it didn't even occur to me the Russians would have had one. I was assuming if anyone it would have been the Americans.

Cheers!
 
Good rough overview here https://www.americanrifleman.org/articles/2015/6/11/winchester-lever-actions-go-to-war/

Basic summary is in WWI France and Britain used them as secondary arms for the Navy or non-combat areas to free up arms for the front. Russia used a ton of 1895s in 7.62x54r (might have been as high as 2/3 of production was made for Russia) and those did see a fair bit of front line service. Overall though not many people used them in combat, too expensive and complex for a infantry rifle (in comparison to a bolt action).
 
The Pacific Coast Militia Rangers.

Early in WW2 the Canadian government issued them with 30-30 Winchesters. Model 94s I think. Cheap to source, cheap to feed, very familiar to the reservists who patrolled the coasts, islands and mountains. A desireable collecting subset of militaria too.
 
At least ONE M95 was used in Cuba. It was given to the Roughrider by Teddy Roosevelt.

The French issued Model 94, 30-30 riles before WWII and the list goes on.

OP, I suspect your're query is on lever action, repeating rifles, lots of single shot lever operated actions as well were used.

Look up the "Cuban Winchester", which was a lever action, converted to full auto.
 
During WW1 the British Royal Navy issued them for the use of the on-board Royal Marine contingent to use for mine disposal, boarding and shore-party activities. The RN Division of the days was large part of the Fleet and took part in the Gallipoli campaign with great loss of life. They are, safe to say, exceedingly rare and valuable guns to identify.

In addition - this might be useful - from TonyE -

As Joseph said, the Royal Navy had a mixture of Lee-Enfields (the long rifle) and SMLEs at the outbreak of war. Winston Churchill was First Sea Lord and on 25th November 1914 he wrote a memo in typically direct language as follows:

THE RIFLE SHORTAGE

The following course is to be adopted:-

1. As soon as the War Office are ready to hand over the 50,000 Japanese rifles, the whole of the rifles, long and short, whether used by sailors or marines, on board H.M. ships at home and abroad, will be collected and brought on shore to the Royal Naval Ordnance Depots. The Japanese rifles will be issued to all ships in their place; there will be no rifles of any sort on board H.M. ships other than Japanese.

2. From the British rifles surrendered by the Fleet, 15,000 short .303 charger loading rifles will be set aside for the Royal Naval Division, i.e. one rifle for each of 12,000 men, plus 25 per cent for reserve and training. All the rifles now possessed by the Royal Naval Division will then be surrendered to the Ordnance depots for the 15,000 short British .303, and no more.

3. There will then be handed over to the Army 57,800 rifles, of which 9,000 will be short charger loading.

4. The 50,000 Japanese rifles will then be issued to the Fleet in the following proportion:-

One rifle for each marine and one rifle for every five sailors, ships on foreign service receiving one rifle for every three sailors. The rest of the rifles will be issued as required to trawlers and auxiliaries, and kept in the Royal Marine and Royal Naval Ordnance depots.

The Fleet will thus be completely re-armed with the 50,000 Japanese rifles, and the Royal Naval Division with .303 short rifles ready for field service.

Let me now have calculations worked out on this basis; and draft a letter accordingly to the War Office.

November 25, 1914 W.S.C.

The navy did not like the Arisaka very much and when Britain started shipping all the Japanese rifles to Russia in late 1915 the navy had theirs replaced by Ross Mark IIIB rifles.

These were used by the RMs on board all capital ships and also for destruction of mines as previously mentioned. there were however other small arms used by the navy. They had 21,000 Winchester Model 1892 rifles in .44-40 calibre and about 5,000 Model 1894 rifles in .30-30 calibre. These were mainly used for arming boarding parties as they were short and handy and would not have needed any great range.
 
Last edited:
Back in the '60s Winchester 1895s in 7.62x54R appeared on the surplus market. I saw a large stack of them at Williams Gunsight in Davison, MI. They were really used.
I do not know their origin, although I very much doubt that they had been sold surplus by the Soviet Union. Finland maybe? They could have been in Finland since the 1920s.
 
The book "Allied Rifle Contracts in America" by Luke Mercaldo is a good read and a good source of information. It covers the Russian contract for the Winchester Model 1895 as well as the Montreal Home Guard contract for the Savage Model 1899 during WW1. Other rifle contracts covered are: The Model 1891 Mosin-Nagant, The Model 1889 Belgian Mauser, the Enfield Pattern 1914 (P14), The Remington Model 99 Single Shot Military rifle and the Model 1907-1915 Berthier.
 
Large numbers of the Russian 95s were also used in the Spanish civil war. They could have been sourced from there.

That is entirely possible. Franco's government sold off vast numbers of obsolete surplus rifles many of which had been used in the Civil War. 7mm Mausers, plus IIIB Rosses, Mosin Nagants.
 
"Back in the '60s Winchester 1895s in 7.62x54R appeared on the surplus market. I saw a large stack of them at Williams Gunsight in Davison, MI. They were really used.
I do not know their origin, although I very much doubt that they had been sold surplus by the Soviet Union. Finland maybe? They could have been in Finland since the 1920s. "

Those were from Spain, Russian sent a large number of them for use during the Spanish civil war.
 
The Ottomans had Winchester 1866s in very large numbers in the mid-late 19th century, it's almost certain they saw use in the Great War. Likely not on the direct front line but in reserve, fortress or perhaps naval use.
 
Many thanks I'll take a look! I admit it didn't even occur to me the Russians would have had one. I was assuming if anyone it would have been the Americans.Cheers!

American military "trialed" numerous lever guns in the 1860's to 1895. As all of them at that time had tube magazines, the fact that during the trials they had a couple or three magazine detonations that soured the brass on running anymore...gun manufacture's were prohibited from entering anymore in any trials (Re; the Col. Brophy "Marlin bible) until the tube mag was replaced with a box mag...hence the development of the "95"...but by the time the 95 was made available the "bolt rifle" fad had become the choice of the Armament procurement divisions of the U.S military.

There were a bunch of the original 1860 Henry rifles use by a couple of Union Army companies during the American Civil War but they were outfitted by their state governments or privately in at least one case. They were never an "official U.S Armaments" procurement that I am aware off.
 
I've handled a Winchester lever action of some sort that was Canadian Military marked. I was told it was a West Coast Ranger rifle from WW2.
 
Wow, thanks everyone - this is super information and great references!

Really interesting points about the relatively complexity of a lever action versus a bolt, which makes it all the more interesting that they saw use in a naval context (salt water corrosion, etc.).

Many thanks again!
 
Back
Top Bottom