Best HD option in .223?

shawn said:
The only thing you are focusing on is trying to prove that people that do this for a living know less than you. Again notice how not a single person agrees with you. Your opinion is based on, "i think", "I believe". "I watched on youtube" while ours it based on "I have done", "I have been trained", "I have confirmed during force on force", "I have done it for real with real guns against real bad guys with real guns"

Or do you want another pic of brass?

Shawn

Shawn
Click to expand...

Personally, I’d take the YouTube information supplied by Glover, Ryan, et al over the meanderings of a bunch of cgn blowhards 10 out of 10 times.
 
shawn said:
The only thing you are focusing on is trying to prove that people that do this for a living know less than you. Again notice how not a single person agrees with you. Your opinion is based on, "i think", "I believe". "I watched on youtube" while ours it based on "I have done", "I have been trained", "I have confirmed during force on force", "I have done it for real with real guns against real bad guys with real guns"

Or do you want another pic of brass?

Shawn

Shawn
Click to expand...
Food for thought: Your camp talks about themselves, but it’s impossible to verify. If it was the obvious truth it would be the standard training method. But I can’t find it demonstrated anywhere... they’re just words.

Rather than a pic of brass, show me videos saying it’s the standard method to aim first before first shots. Easy?
 
Last edited:
PinaKaleada said:
Food for thought: Your camp talks about themselves, but it’s impossible to verify. If it was the obvious truth it would be the standard training method. But I can’t find it demonstrated anywhere... they’re just words.

Rather than a pic of brass, show me videos saying it’s the standard method to aim first before first shots. Easy?
Click to expand...

Food for thought your camp talks about things they have never done, never seen done, and will never do and its easy to verify.

Also it is the standard training method.

Shawn
 
popcan said:
Re thinking my needs... what’s everyone’s choice on a home defense firearm?

I’ve always had an M1 carbine around, but perhaps it’s time to upgrade to something more modern?

I’d prefer something light, non restricted, and in .223.
(I’m not really looking at PCC’s at the moment - that’s the hole the M1 carbine fills for me).

I’d be interested to hear your opinions!
Click to expand...

If you're wedded to the idea of something chambered in .223 for 'home defense', maybe you should start by checking the thread pitch on your suppressor, and then choosing the rifle (with threading that'll match your suppressor).

Oh yeah... don't forget to watch out for the helicopters.

 
PinaKaleada said:
Food for thought: Your camp talks about themselves, but it’s impossible to verify. If it was the obvious truth it would be the standard training method. But I can’t find it demonstrated anywhere... they’re just words.

Rather than a pic of brass, show me videos saying it’s the standard method to aim first before first shots. Easy?
Click to expand...

It is standard method across all CAF to aim first then shoot. It takes a fraction of a second to do it. Some, including me, will say they don’t recall getting a perfect sight picture because it has become muscle memory and we don’t need to focus so much on this because it just happens.

Standard for a center mass shot (9 ring) is 1.5 second and its not that challenging ,after a bit of practice, to do sub 1 second. That’s from the Infantry PWT4/Tacshoot from the basic Infantry course.


I can’t believe this argument is still going on...
 
DT741 said:
I can’t believe this argument is still going on...
Click to expand...


sRaEtcG.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom