This configuration constitutes the ideal early season grouse/pheasant gun, IMO. I recently bought the side lock version of the same gun. Like Brybenn, I'd pay $1000 for it, but I'm kinda turned off by that inch and a quarter length-of-pull.
I find it strange that we turn our noses up at barrels that are about 4 or 5 inches shorter than the current trend on a very well made and attractive gun and then discuss in several threads which Turkish or Chinese coach gun is best...LOL
Side by sides with double triggers are only cool to a small demographic anymore.
I find it strange that we turn our noses up at barrels that are about 4 or 5 inches shorter than the current trend on a very well made and attractive gun and then discuss in several threads which Turkish or Chinese coach gun is best...LOL
Side by sides with double triggers are only cool to a small demographic anymore.
Side by sides with double triggers are only cool to a small demographic anymore.
...and that couldn't be more strange even if it was Turdo's idea. When I see a single trigger on a gun offered for sale, even on a gun configured exactly the way I want otherwise, I immediately look elsewhere. I own 25 shotguns presently. Only 2 are single triggered - both of those are competition guns.
Same with pistol grip stocks. I'm only interested in straight stocked guns, except for competition guns (both competition guns are pistol grips). I would stick to straight stocks even on competition guns, but good luck finding one.
I have a gorgeous AYA #1 that has only one thing wrong with it - it is fitted with a single trigger. In my opinion a traditional double should have fixed chokes, standard length chambers and double triggers. A minority opinion but based on a fair bit of experience. I once owned an AYA XXV sidelock similar to the one discussed here except with the more expensive sidelocks. I used it with no complaints for a few years, and sold it for $2350. I also prefer longer barrels but didn't find the 25" barrels a handicap on the XXV, Churchill was right about his tapered rib and short barrels, at least for close range upland birds.
I bought the Churchill/Hastings Game Shooting book years ago and found it interesting. But after reading about his shooting technique, I don’t understand what difference the rib would make. Or why you would even need one ?
I've had a few Spanish side by sides including AYA with the 25" barrels and Churchill rib, and I shoot my guns - some more than others. The only one I currently own is a 20 gauge original EJ Churchill Regal XXV from 1959 and I have two of his books, one of which details the Churchill shooting system. It is a form of quick instinctive snap shooting, never pre mounted, that does not adapt well to longer, heavier barrelled guns or to the more deliberate shooting style favoured by most shooters today. These light centre weighted XXV guns, well made by any good maker are wonderfully effective on game birds but the shooting style must be learned and practiced to be effective. They do not respond well to the more deliberate style most of us use on a sporting clays or skeet range.