LWRC - What we have going on.....

Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The IAR (Infantry Automatic Rifle) is a rifle, that can handle a sustained fire role when required. It fires closed bolt semi auto. on switching to auto, it will fire the first round closed bolt and everything subsequent in open bolt to allow the rifle to cool more effeciently between strings of fire and to prevent cook offs. Turning the selector back to Semi sends the bolt home, and chambers a round but does not fire it until you pull the trigger.

It has a radial finned heavy hammer forged 4150 CMV barrel and is Hard Chrome lined. The chamber is slightly different for added reliability and barrel life.

Nov. 21 the IAR will be featured on Future Weapons.

LWRC IAR with Bayo and ACOG
DSC00183.jpg


Hammer Forged 4150 CMV Poly-Rifled 1-7 twist barrel blank scrap (Note: The nice and evenly spaced hammer marks on exterior)
DSC00166.jpg


IAR with rail mounted M203 and AimPoint optics
DSC00155.jpg


Close-up of optics and receiver markings
DSC00154.jpg


View through AimPoint COMPM4... AimPoint 3X magnifier swung to the left out of the way by using a LaRue LT649 mount
DSC00165.jpg


View of IAR with ARM-R top panel removed
DSC00173.jpg


Close-up of Radial fluted heavey barrel and front sight block
DSC00179.jpg


Another view of barrel and front sight block assembly (Note: windage adjustment, gas adjustment knob, folding front sight and bayo-lug)
DSC00175.jpg


Here are some pics of the Limited Run Initial Prototypes of the SABR (sniper assaulter battle rifle). LRIPS are always produced prior to full production so you can determine costs, work out production bugs, work out any bugs with production rifles, and determine if you can replicate repeatable results when it comes to accuracy, reliability. A proper LRIP cannot be hand fit. You must adjust your MFG process until the rifle meets the product requirement with parts off the line. One of the ways the government determines this is to buy some LRIPS, take them apart, mix up the parts and build the guns back up and test them.

The SABR receiver uses a L side non-reciprocating charging handle AKA the Israeli FAL. The Israeli Fal charging handle is a forward assist. you pull the charging handle back on the stuck carrier, press in the handle and push it forward.

For those that don't need a forward assist, a standard cocking handle will work also, and has a smaller knob than the Israeli.

2lstq3p.jpg


21kgznq.jpg


The point of this was that you do not have to come up off the gun to cycle it. With the gas in the off position, you can run it like a straight pull rifle with subsonic ammunition and suppressor in place.

Here are some more pics.

sabrmfg1.JPG


sabrmfg2.JPG


sabrmfg3.JPG


sabrmfg5.JPG


sabrmfg6.JPG


sabrmfg7.JPG


sabrmfg8.JPG


lower1.jpg


lower2.jpg


lower3.jpg


sabrrec1.jpg


sabrrec2.jpg


sabrrec3.jpg


sabrrec4.jpg


sabrrec5.jpg


sabrrec6.jpg
 
Is the SABR going to be piston, or DI (couldn't tell because you guys do such a low profile gas system!)- because you know that there are guys here already hoping it won't be declared a "variant" of either the FN or the AR, or at least that it won't appear in print as such :D. Thanks for posting these photos, it's nice to have the insight into what goes into building rifles, it obviously isn't easy, having to have tolerances tight enough for accuracy, but with enough play for interchangeability and manufacturing systems flexible enough to react to changes midway. With the costs involved it's a wonder any of us get firearms, thanks again.
 
who's Kurt? I see his name all over in those pics above............ ;)

how long till you guys test the .308?
 
looks like alot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for only a slightly better AR.
I find the old gas system is fine the way it is. The only problem is the tight tolarances around the bolt carrier. Which get clog with dirt and cause the bolt to jam up.
 
I would love to see a 13.5" or 16" 7.62 that is light weight, durable and reliable. Accuracy is not the most important as long as it can match stock AR15.
 
I saw a sample of the Open Bolt Auto at SHOT 2007.
I think it was Jesse Gomez that I spoke with.
(At the time, the OBA was sort of hush-hush. I found that a bit odd, as it was on display.)
Anyway, thanks for the update, I was wondering how it is progressing.
 
Is the SABR going to be piston, or DI (couldn't tell because you guys do such a low profile gas system!)- because you know that there are guys here already hoping it won't be declared a "variant" of either the FN or the AR, or at least that it won't appear in print as such :D. Thanks for posting these photos, it's nice to have the insight into what goes into building rifles, it obviously isn't easy, having to have tolerances tight enough for accuracy, but with enough play for interchangeability and manufacturing systems flexible enough to react to changes midway. With the costs involved it's a wonder any of us get firearms, thanks again.

You bet i wish it wont be classified as a variant!
 
48th, Everything looks freakin' awesome. Nice to see you back in these parts.

No one has asked yet so I will, any progress on a Canadian distributor?

Wish I could have gotten my hands on one of those GP M4 lowers when they were available, IMO they were some of the nicest looking lowers I've ever seen pictures of.
 
If I don't get one ASAP, my #### will fall off. :evil:

Most cool factor !!


Dont worry, you will have lots of time to regrow another #### by the time LWRC ever sells anything up here :)

He teased us like 2 years ago and we got nothing...........
 
Why is it so difficult to get distribution in Canada?

Couldn't Questar, TSE, CanAM, etc just add it to their roster?? It's the same process as bringing in any US AR15 :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom