Ordering and scoping a Savage rifle -- what to expect for non Savage owners..

manbearpig

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
72   0   0
Just received my Savage 16 FCSS from SIR. i own a Savage .17 HMR and 24F but this is the first full-sized Savage Centrefire bolt gun I've ever owned, and i ordered it blind from SIR. this particular gun is a stainless .308 but i suspect all their other model 16 weather warriors will be pretty much the same.

my gun cabinet is full of mostly Rugers and Remingtons, so i thought id write this up not as a full review but as a quick comparison to give the average Ruger/Remington owner an idea what he is in store for. ive picked up several Savages at gun stores but after the briefest examination i usually put them down, dismissing them as unrefined and ugly. actually forcing myself to own one has made me realise that they actually are quite innovative and well-designed, and should serve very well as a tool, if not a 'fine rifle':

immediate impressions:
-wow, this gun is light
-the stock inletting looks bloody awful

Cons:
-in front of the barrel nut there is about a 1/4" gap in the inletting extending a few inches up the barrel, it looks horrid. i cringe every time i see it.
-the barrel came floated and well centred in the stock, unfortunately the stock is so flexible that even pressing on it with your thumb is enough to make it touch the barrel. if you keep the stock then you need to be careful not to exert any sideways pressure against the last 2-3 inches, or lean the tip of the forend against a tree or something as a firing support. other than the tip of the stock being flexible, the rest seems sturdy enough with an above-average quality squishy rubber buttpad.
-the rifle came with several small dings in it, as if it were assembled by hand by people who regarded it as a tool and nothing more. around the ejection port there are some small dings in the edges, there were some scuffs on the barrel, and the barrel nut was slightly stripped (almost imperceptible). i bought this as a working gun/all-weather beater so i dont care, but someone who babies their firearms and worries about every ding should perhaps inspect them in the store before buying.
-trigger group is not stainless, but all blued. so much for 'weather warrior'.
-cocking indicator/bolt release is ugly as sin, quirky, and again blued not stainless.

Pros:
-very smooth bolt. the bolt head/lugs are floated so that they automatically align with the receiver. this means that when you work the bolt, slight misalignments do not affect the bolt or make it bind, making it feel much smoother.
-well-designed, robust mag and mag release that you can easily get at even with gloved hands.
-very light - this particular gun, although it has a sporter weight barrel, feels and handles more like a mountain rifle.
-exceptional, simple 3-position safety in the most intuitive and visible place - on the tang - with bright red 'fire' indicator.
-Accutrigger: i didnt even look at the manual, within 10 minutes of opening the box i had the action out of the stock and the trigger adjusted down to a crisp, creep-free 1.5lbs with the adjustment tool savage provides.
-aside from the stock, which is actually fibreglass reinforced and not 'plastic' as i had expected, no plastic parts: everything is steel, triggerguard, mag, magwell are all high quality stainless with good fit/finish, mag is perfectly flush with a stainless bottom plate and seems very sturdy.

overall i am very happy with the gun - it seems well designed, balances well and is lightweight, and should suit its planned purpose - an all-weather utility gun - perfectly.
now to take it to the range and shoot some test groups - although even Savage bashers rarely dispute their out-of-the-box accuracy, so im not too worried there.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the review. Out of curiousity, what is the LOP for that model? Their website doesn't say. How's the buttpad?
 
LOP is 13.4" measured from the trigger in a parrallel line with the barrel.

the buttpad is squishy rubber. the stock, aside from the inletting woes, isnt that bad - its fibreglass reinforced plastic, shape is decent, the only big downside is the tip of the forend is quite flexible. so no using a military style sling as a shooting aid. if you rest or lean the gun against a support, tree, bags, etc it should be fine as long as you rest it further back and not near the tip of the forend where it is most flexible.

**edit
actually resting the gun on something vertically is fine, the stock is very stiff this way. its lateral movement that bends it - a side-side pressure. i was toying with the idea of filling the stock with fibreglass to further stiffen it and opening up the barrel channel a little bit, but i think i can avoid side-side pressure on a forend tip pretty easily so it shouldnt be a big issue.
 
Last edited:
I liken Savage rifles to the not-so-pretty girl who can cook, clean, and is a demon in the sack. The other guys with their high-maintainence women can laugh and sneer all they want but they just have no idea how good we Savage owners got it
 
Savage DOES make more refined models - the 14 series American classic, and the 12 series laminate varminters come to mind. The finish is better, the stainless models ARE 100% stainless and the stocks are night and day.

You pretty much get what you pay for.
 
I have a 12fvss Savage that I would not trade for anything. It is practical and accurate beyond what it is asked to be, Smooth action and with the .223 ammo it eats, a 1000 yard shot is commonplace. It's "value" far exceeds the monitary layout.
 
dscn9121nx2.jpg

here you can see the mag (4-shot, top loading (snap them in), staggered column). the base is a nice smooth stainless steel that fits flush with the bottom of the receiver - flusher than most fixed mags. The allen screw in front of the triggerguard and one in front of the mag release are the bedding screws, the one behind the trigger just holds the triggerguard.

dscn9122ua6.jpg

rear view of the action.
you could not design a better safety if you tried. THIS is where the safety should be, and this is what it should look like. theres no tiny stamped lettering you can hardly make out, no strange levers, a simple 'on/off' switch with a clear red dot that even someone picking up a gun for the first time could figure out.
theres the blued steel cocking indicator/bolt release that i think is so ugly. ah well, you cant win em all. bit annoying to remove the bolt since you have to put the gun on fire, pull the trigger (eek) and hold it down, then depress the bolt release and pull the bolt free with your other hand.

dscn9126mn9.jpg

bolt lifted.
dscn9128ei4.jpg

bolt removed.
i cant emphasize enough how smooth the bolt is. the bolt lugs/face are floated, so they self-true to the action.

dscn9129gc3.jpg

quick shot of the stock. the buttpad seems perfectly adequate, and better than most factory pads. on a .308 i wont be replacing it. Length of Pull is 13.4 inches.
 
Last edited:
dscn9184op3.jpg

bottom shot with mag inserted.

dscn9178nn6.jpg

re-shot this, blown out under insane lighting so you can actually see the almost 1/4" gap in the inletting ahead of the barrel nut. this and the flexible forend tip are my only gripes with the stock.

dscn9185fy6.jpg

cross section of the action. seems pretty solid.
shot of the bolt face. i prefer the controlled-feed, mauser-style bolt with huge claw extractor of the Rugers, but this Savage bolt looks no worse than a Remington 700 bolt.
 
Can't agree more on the smoothness of the bolt. I went into the store completely convinced I'd be walking out with the $700 Remington SPS Stainless of my dreams, and I walked out of the store with a Savage 111 package instead. I couldn't believe the bolt felt so smooth on such a cheap rifle! Even the Weatherby Vanguard felt looser/sloppy.

Good buy, that's for sure. A bit off topic, but manbearpig might be interested as well, where does one get replacement Savage stocks for guns with the detachable mag? I've only ever seen them for guns with blind mags :(.
 
I liken Savage rifles to the not-so-pretty girl who can cook, clean, and is a demon in the sack. The other guys with their high-maintainence women can laugh and sneer all they want but they just have no idea how good we Savage owners got it
Yup couldn't said it better except that they swallow too;)
Kind of plain but they can shoot as well as anything. Don't worry about the 1/4 gap as the recoil lug is what does the work. Not paying somebody to stand there and polish the parts and spend time fitting everything into a pretty package is how they keep the price down. You don't ever see anyone coming on posting about on that doesn't shoot now do ya!;). I have one that I got on a swap deal right here from Dizzy Dan. Swapped him a Rem 700 .243 for it if you can imagine:D:D. Bedded the lug and the rear of the reciever, tweeked the factory trigger down as far as I could safely and shot one of the smallest three shot groups at a hundred that I have ever shot with anything using 52 AMax bullets and 27.5 gr 748 (.223). Memory serves me that it was right around the 1/8". Lot of gun in a functional package. I doubt I will be parting with "Little Dizzy":D
 
waiting for my bases and rings to come in then ill take it out to the range.

You should do it like a three part article... you've already posted the first... then the next can be discussing the various scope mount options & why you went with your choice. And of course the scope mount... then the third part could be the 'field test' where you sight in & post pics of your target(s), etc....

THEN.... the three parts could be a 'sticky' at the top of the page for any nubes.... cause the questions regarding Savage rifles, especially the 'econo' package rifles, comes up so often this would be a great way to address it....
 
Last edited:
Can these mags be loaded while still in the rifle, or does it have to come out to top it up??

they can be loaded while in the rifle easily - just press down through the feed lips. im actually really happy with the mag and mag release compared to my remmy 700s.

So what did you pick? And what scope?

burris XTB steel base:
xtbtacticalbases.jpg


leupold QRW rings:
493217_d.jpg

(ordered low - hope they fit)

Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40mm Ballistic Plex:
Burris-3-9x40.jpg


i dont need quick-release rings but the only other option was Burris Zee or signature Zee rings which im not totally happy with - i wanted a better set of rings. a set like the Leupold QRW but with a permanent 2-screw mount would have been ideal, but i can live with the quick release lever i guess. itll make transporting the gun a lot easier since i can remove the scope.

i do know from the burris mount guide that for the Burris 3-9x40 scope on the round receiver savages with the steel Burris weaver base they indicate Low rings, so if the Leupold rings are slightly lower than the Burris i can always swap with the set of Low Zee rings that i do have.
 
Last edited:
on second thought the quick releases might come in handy -- i can get a second set of light, fast-tracking sights and remove the scope when not needed. probably the best option is to get something like a Docter Optik reflex sight clone to leave on the gun for humping around in the brush and keep the scope in a case in my pack to mount when i need it.

with the barrel cut down another 4 inches it should make for a very light, fast handling gun. i almost regret not getting aluminum weaver bases to shaveeven more weight off the thing.
in my experience reducing the barrel length of a .308 - within reason, and with a good crown - does nothing but improve accuracy.
 
Savages are also a switchbarrel rifle.The barrels screw in as normal,but instead of stopping against a shoulder,they use a jam nut. This means almost anyone can set headspace.Bolt heads are pinned to the bolt and can easily be changed as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom