- Location
- Prince Albert, Sk
Do these publishers of load data even actually test these loadings?
I know they do but seriously, I decided to load to mag length on a 300WM which happens to be what the load data also states.(it's not just one manufacturers info either)
Now when using these longer bullets there is no way in hell that most of these loads won't be or aren't compressed loads when using their test data.
There is no way they are getting consistent seating depth either with the loads they have listed as they increase in charge weight.
I was loading minimum , compressed load!
Guess it is going to be a non repeater which isn't a big deal but hate starting like this.
How the heck do they get consistent test data?
I know they do but seriously, I decided to load to mag length on a 300WM which happens to be what the load data also states.(it's not just one manufacturers info either)
Now when using these longer bullets there is no way in hell that most of these loads won't be or aren't compressed loads when using their test data.
There is no way they are getting consistent seating depth either with the loads they have listed as they increase in charge weight.
I was loading minimum , compressed load!
Guess it is going to be a non repeater which isn't a big deal but hate starting like this.
How the heck do they get consistent test data?
Last edited:




















































