question on ruger deerfield 44

[m1978]

just for interest's sake, i though it would ask how many people would like to see ruger bring the 44 automatic rifle back? i think its really a great setup and would love to own one.

 

[maynard]

Had one years ago and shot my first 4 deer with it, great little gun. Still kicking myself for selling it.

 

[captonion]

I have one, very reliable and as accurate as any 30/30 I've had. Would also like to see the tube fed model made again but a 357 mag version added.

 

[leveractionjunkie]

I’d love one if they build it right.

 

[bunny]

If Ruger built another semi .44 they would probably go along the line of the PCC or some other tactical styled rig, I would prefer they bring back the deerfield or the tube fed carbine, I think they would sell very well.

 

[m1978]

i think they would sell well also. really a very sensible rifle, effective and fun. would also be a great camp rifle

 

[WKAYE]

I'd love to have one, but I bet they'll be declared a mini 14 variant and banned.

 

[S-357]

Yeeeeeup

 

[dilly]

I am very fortunate to have one that I bought when I was 16. I needed a good deer rifle but didn't have a ton of money. Paid Mr Karl Oortmans (RIP) $240 for it. Its a "never sell". Tube mag "finger groove" model that is responsible for the 10 pointer I have stuffed and on the wall in my den.

 

[Scott_N]

I was always interested in these and I'd consider buying one if they starting making them again.

 

[Brian46]

just for interest's sake, i though it would ask how many people would like to see ruger bring the 44 automatic rifle back? i think its really a great setup and would love to own one.

Yes, I inquired about this with ruger, a detachable mag version using desert eagle magazines sounded like a real posibility

 

[double gun]

Bring back the Deerfield, but offer it in stainless this time - and if you want to get crazy offer, another one in 357.

 

[cyclone]

Heck, a 77/44 for under $ 1,000 would be nice...

 

[mrgoat]

I have one of the older Ruger tube fed semi's in 44 mag. Beautiful light, handy wee rifle, have had it for decades, would not trade for its weight in gold. A simple rifle with clean lines that works. A gun Ruger should definitely bring back into the line up. But they would probably screw it up by adding all sorts of BS to keep the millennials happy.

 

[m1978]

Heck, a 77/44 for under $ 1,000 would be nice...

they are. i also like the 92 winchester takedown and wish i had one. like a pool cue take it with you.

 

[Ruger007]

I had one for years. Finally traded it off. They were a neat gun. But tastes changed.

 

[saskbooknut]

I suspect Ruger learned their lesson the first time around. Not a great seller, not a good prospect for revival.

 

[sillymike]

Heck, a 77/44 for under $ 1,000 would be nice...

That would get my attention!

 

[diemaco]

I was handling my m1 carbine the other day and thought it sure would be nice if someone made one in .357 or .44 mag...

 

[cement head]

I am very fortunate to have one that I bought when I was 16. I needed a good deer rifle but didn't have a ton of money. Paid Mr Karl Oortmans (RIP) $240 for it. Its a "never sell". Tube mag "finger groove" model that is responsible for the 10 pointer I have stuffed and on the wall in my den.

Dam that thing is in really good shape . you must have refinished the stock or you were a well behaved 16 year old . I have never owned one but a former friend had one and used to use it for deer hunting . the 44 magnum cartridge is good for many things.