What’s the twist rate on the 243 and 22-250?
9.25 and 12 respectively
What’s the twist rate on the 243 and 22-250?
I dont understand why they're so heavy. If they're using an aluminum receiver I'd think it would lighten the gun, not make it heavier, so where the hell is all this weight coming from? A Savage 110 hunter is listed at 7.25lbs, so this is 1.5lbs heavier than that.
https://revivaler.com/heym-sr30-straight-pull-rifle/
This says the SR30 is under 7lbs in its lighter configurations, which means straight pulls aren't inherently heavy. I can't help but think the 8.8lbs listed by Savage must be a mistake...
The expanding ball bearing lockup into an aluminum receiver, seems like a problem waiting to happen? Iam sure some engineering went into the design, but I have to wonder if these are going to stand up especially in high pressure chamberings.
Barrel extension, more parts in the bolt, and integrated rail
Plus heavy contour barrel
The 110 Hog Hunter is listed at 7.3lbs with a 20" medium contour barrel. (https://savagearms.com/content?p=firearms&a=product_summary&s=57018)
The Impulse Hunter is listed at 8.8lbs with a 22" medium contour barrel. (https://www.savagearms.com/content?p=firearms&a=product_summary&s=57647)
From what I can gather from some quick googling, an inch of barrel only weighs a few onces (24" 300winmag is only 0.1lbs heavier than a 22" 308win according to Savage's website). Call it half a pound for the different barrel lengths, that should account for any slight differences in contour as well (unless Savage has greatly changed what "medium contour" means to them), and you're still looking at a full pound difference. If the receiver is lighter (aluminum is lighter than steel after all) then the barrel extension and bolt amount to a full pound of extra weight PLUS whatever the weight savings are from using aluminum for the receiver. That seems like a LOT of extra weight for those two relatively small pieces?
I would tooVerrrry very Interesting to say the least, personally, I'd sooner have the 6.5 Swede than the Creedmore..., that's me .
Am I the only one who thinks the new savage rifles are ugly as sin?
That 110 has just a plastic stock and the Impulse has an accustock. The accustock is quite heavy for what it is. There was essentially no weight difference between the accustock on my 110 tactical and the MDT LSS-XL that replaced it. IIRC, my 110 tactical is listed around 8.8lbs with a fluted 24" barrel. That's probably a more fair comparison, and weighs about the same as the new rifles. Seems to me like the weight savings from aluminum receiver are roughly cancelled out by the barrel extension and extra bolt parts
9.25 and 12 respectively
Whats really funny is they copied almost exactly the straight pull bolt from the heym SR30 which is a good thing as its a really strong and smooth system. As far as complaining about the weight of the rifle, when is the last time some of you stepped on a scale and critized yourselves for being overweight.
Many of us hunt where a 15km day is pretty average. It's not ontario flat either. You carry all the weight you want to your treestand. I won't judge...
The expanding ball bearing lockup into an aluminum receiver, seems like a problem waiting to happen? Iam sure some engineering went into the design, but I have to wonder if these are going to stand up especially in high pressure chamberings.




























