Tuff22 Rear Tang

B

BigGreenMachine

Regular
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
Location
Newfoundland
I have looked around for images of the rear tang on these recievers. Do all of the Tuff varients come machined to accept a rear tang? Are they cross compatible with a stock like the new 10/22 KRG Bravo or Victor that would accept the KIDD rear tang?
 
Last edited:
BigGreenMachine said:
For anyone wondering. Does not look to fit the krg 10/22.

http://www.outdoorsmenforum.ca/showthread.php?t=205609
Click to expand...

Correct, it does not. There is a possibility to make the next batch of TUF-22 receivers to have a rear lug the same profile as the Kidd version. This goes somewhat further to standardize the rear lugs for the chassis' and stocks that are cut for the Kidd one. Not that one lug is better than the other, it's just that most stocks like that are US made so they have the numbers to do it. There's a fairly good chance we may also add the TUF-22TX back in the line up for those looking for as good a platform as possible to shoot all the new rimfire series going on now. A threaded barrel version in a solid chassis....yum-yum.
 
Dlask Arms said:
Correct, it does not. There is a possibility to make the next batch of TUF-22 receivers to have a rear lug the same profile as the Kidd version. This goes somewhat further to standardize the rear lugs for the chassis' and stocks that are cut for the Kidd one. Not that one lug is better than the other, it's just that most stocks like that are US made so they have the numbers to do it. There's a fairly good chance we may also add the TUF-22TX back in the line up for those looking for as good a platform as possible to shoot all the new rimfire series going on now. A threaded barrel version in a solid chassis....yum-yum.
Click to expand...

Is there a possibility of a new bolt on rear tang that works with existing TUF-22 receivers and fits an inlet for a KIDD tang? that would be absolutely fantastic, but I don't know the KIDD system so I'm not sure if it's even possible.
 
TheNatural21 said:
Is there a possibility of a new bolt on rear tang that works with existing TUF-22 receivers and fits an inlet for a KIDD tang? that would be absolutely fantastic, but I don't know the KIDD system so I'm not sure if it's even possible.
Click to expand...

It would be the best possible solution but as I mentioned I have never seen one here in person so I can't say for sure.
 
Dlask Arms said:
There is a possibility to make the next batch of TUF-22 receivers to have a rear lug the same profile as the Kidd version. This goes somewhat further to standardize the rear lugs for the chassis' and stocks that are cut for the Kidd one.
Click to expand...

Id be down for a Canadian made reciever and tang built to that spec. As would others, there is little doubt. Thanks for the reply.
 
TheNatural21 said:
I don't see why a tuff-22 wouldn't fit in a bravo. Just not with the rear tang. As far as I know the only chassis that accepts the Dlask rear tang is the one they sell on their website that was a partnership with MDT.
Click to expand...

Spot on. There are many companies that use a rear tang but there is no industry standard so to speak. If we use the Kidd profile then that would be one step closer to some semblance of normality in stock inletting. We are still on the fence about ordering more Kidd stuff though. With a price gouging increase of up to 25% on some of their product they may have priced themselves out of the Kanadian market.
 
Overly-pricy Kidd parts beat no parts at all, but if I understand your point they may have created enough room under their prices for some very decent Made-in-Canada product to take their place.
 
I have 2 rifles from dlask.
My wife has a high mileage DAR that still shoots amazingly.
I sold off my VQ with carbon bbl last year to build a tuf. Everything else is Kidd on it.

In terms of accuracy, they both match or beat the VQ. If I needed another 22, I’d have no issue trusting dlask to build me a tac driver.
Those dlask builds helped my brother get score rifleman and helped me shoot a 233/236/245 out of 250 at mapleseed this year.
 
nagol said:
I have 2 rifles from dlask.
My wife has a high mileage DAR that still shoots amazingly.
I sold off my VQ with carbon bbl last year to build a tuf. Everything else is Kidd on it.

In terms of accuracy, they both match or beat the VQ. If I needed another 22, I’d have no issue trusting dlask to build me a tac driver.
Those dlask builds helped my brother get score rifleman and helped me shoot a 233/236/245 out of 250 at mapleseed this year.
Click to expand...

Dang brother, serious props there, thank you ( :
 
mileageman said:
Please do a version of your Tuff-22 with a the KIDD style rear tang attachment method!!! It would fit perfectly in the Victor Titan stock I prefer to run on my 10/22's!
Click to expand...

How about this :

A billet CNC'd magnesium TUF-22TX threaded receiver with the Kidd profile rear tang and 20" match fluted barrel ! Crazy light, crazy strong, super accurate and with the rear hold down option.....coupled with our new 2-stage trigger pack and the option to add a new aluminum bolt for shooting subs or a tungsten sliding block heavy bolt to stop bolt bounce when shooting....fast.

I think that would be good too no ? I would buy that fo sho.
 
Dlask Arms said:
How about this :

A billet CNC'd magnesium TUF-22TX threaded receiver with the Kidd profile rear tang and 20" match fluted barrel ! Crazy light, crazy strong, super accurate and with the rear hold down option.....coupled with our new 2-stage trigger pack and the option to add a new aluminum bolt for shooting subs or a tungsten sliding block heavy bolt to stop bolt bounce when shooting....fast.

I think that would be good too no ? I would buy that fo sho.
Click to expand...

Let's not get too crazy here. While more options are always better, and everyone has a different use for a 10/22. To me accuracy is paramount, cost 2nd, weight distant 3rd.

So just a normal tuf-22 with KIDD rear tang attachment to start would suit me best. I wouldn't be opposed to you bringing back your threaded barrel attachment system if it improves accuracy, fits in my Victor Titan 10/22 stock and you give a 1/2moa guarantee like KIDD does. People shooting CPRS / X-22 challenge type matches usually want more weight in their rifle, which means the Magnesium action, barrel fluting would not have much benefit for them.
 
Dlask Arms said:
How about this :

A billet CNC'd magnesium TUF-22TX threaded receiver with the Kidd profile rear tang and 20" match fluted barrel ! Crazy light, crazy strong, super accurate and with the rear hold down option.....coupled with our new 2-stage trigger pack and the option to add a new aluminum bolt for shooting subs or a tungsten sliding block heavy bolt to stop bolt bounce when shooting....fast.

I think that would be good too no ? I would buy that fo sho.
Click to expand...

That sounds like an awesome option. A complete barreled action with a trigger that is tuned for subs just drop it into a chassis and go shoot some CRPS events!
 
Dlask Arms said:
How about this :

A billet CNC'd magnesium TUF-22TX threaded receiver with the Kidd profile rear tang and 20" match fluted barrel ! Crazy light, crazy strong, super accurate and with the rear hold down option.....coupled with our new 2-stage trigger pack and the option to add a new aluminum bolt for shooting subs or a tungsten sliding block heavy bolt to stop bolt bounce when shooting....fast.

I think that would be good too no ? I would buy that fo sho.
Click to expand...

Hey, no fair teasing if it's not up on your website!
 
mileageman said:
Let's not get too crazy here. While more options are always better, and everyone has a different use for a 10/22. To me accuracy is paramount, cost 2nd, weight distant 3rd.

So just a normal tuf-22 with KIDD rear tang attachment to start would suit me best. I wouldn't be opposed to you bringing back your threaded barrel attachment system if it improves accuracy, fits in my Victor Titan 10/22 stock and you give a 1/2moa guarantee like KIDD does. People shooting CPRS / X-22 challenge type matches usually want more weight in their rifle, which means the Magnesium action, barrel fluting would not have much benefit for them.
Click to expand...

Except for the magnesium receiver I was almost serious....in for a penny.

As an aside, we never give accuracy guarantees, it's a silly gimmick to sell guns. There is no way possible to prove said accuracy so, yeah. Our only guarantee is that we are a bricks and mortar manufacturer that has been in business continuously since July 4, 1989. Yup, 32 years of good stuff.

When Joe gets back I'm going to hammer him to finish some projects here and go balls deep into the TUF-22 line up. I would like to see some podiums on those CRPS / X22 matches !

I'm probably going to enter the one in Kamloops this year so we'll see y'all there !
 
Dlask Arms said:
Except for the magnesium receiver I was almost serious....in for a penny.

As an aside, we never give accuracy guarantees, it's a silly gimmick to sell guns. There is no way possible to prove said accuracy so, yeah. Our only guarantee is that we are a bricks and mortar manufacturer that has been in business continuously since July 4, 1989. Yup, 32 years of good stuff.

When Joe gets back I'm going to hammer him to finish some projects here and go balls deep into the TUF-22 line up. I would like to see some podiums on those CRPS / X22 matches !

I'm probably going to enter the one in Kamloops this year so we'll see y'all there !
Click to expand...

I'll be looking forward to seeing some of those new TUF-22's configs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom