Yes, I’ve owned several .243 over the years and have taken numerous deer with them. Have you?
The last deer I took with one was with an 87 grain Berger at 320 yards and it didn’t take a step.
It’s not that a .243 isn’t capable....but it is certainly less capable than a 6 Creed. You may hunt where shots a close and the wind doesn’t blow....or maybe you aren’t capable of using the extra that the 6 offers....i shoot my rifles more than most, and I prefer to go with a rifle that offers me a bit more. If that’s not your thing then you do you...
Given that the 6 CM and 243 Win shoot identical bullets, with the 243 being capable of the higher velocity ... how can the 6mm Creed “double the energy...”?
Given that the 6 CM and 243 Win shoot identical bullets, with the 243 being capable of the higher velocity ... how can the 6mm Creed “double the energy...”?
At 500 yards my 105 Berger has almost 2x the energy of a 95 grain SST. I’m sure it’s over your head and your just arguing to suit your ego. I guess you could build a custom .243 and run the heavier billets....but then you run out of magazine room and end up seating the longer bummer back in the case, eating up the extra capacity.Given that the 6 CM and 243 Win shoot identical bullets, with the 243 being capable of the higher velocity ... how can the 6mm Creed “double the energy...”?
That would be because you’re wrong, they don’t shoot identical bullets
![]()
That would be because you’re wrong, they don’t shoot identical bullets
![]()
That joke graph shows skewed bogus information. How can one compare the two cartridges when using different bullets?
At 500 yards my 105 Berger has almost 2x the energy of a 95 grain SST. I’m sure it’s over your head and your just arguing to suit your ego. I guess you could build a custom .243 and run the heavier billets....but then you run out of magazine room and end up seating the longer bummer back in the case, eating up the extra capacity.
I’m sure you will come back with some other reason you don’t want a 6....and that’s great for you. The OP asked about a 6 creed...
Congrats on your google skills.
Have you loaded 105s in a .243? Did they fit in your magazine? If they did, do you know how much powder capacity you took up with the long bullet seated deep? How well did it shoot seated so far off the lands? What was your BC degradation due to the slower twist?
I get it, you could build a custom .243 that would mostly get you what you get out of a 6mm....that’s not really the point....
That joke graph shows skewed bogus information. How can one compare the two cartridges when using different bullets?
I have a 1:8 .243 barrel ordered. It's going to be a fast twist .243 Win.
Because the entire point of the argument is that you CAN use different bullets. That’s the advantage. Literally the point of the cartridges development.
Anyway. I think I’ve represented my opinion on this topic. I don’t feel the need to further convince anyone. Math is hard for some I guess. The 243 Win is a fine deer round, no problems at all. It’s just not as good the 6mm Creedmoor. Inferior in every way but price and availability if you’re not a hand loader.
That joke graph shows skewed bogus information. How can one compare the two cartridges when using different bullets?
Now you are comparing rifles, not the cartridges in question as you did in post #16 and gave the 6CM the clear advantage over the 243.
Guess again ..... Any time there are comparisons made there needs to be similar test materials used for real results. Otherwise you're just making up numbers, going back to the math you mentioned.
Why not shoot heavy RN bullets from a short bbl 243 and compare it to a 24" 6CM with sleek high BC bullets at long range and tell me how great the 6CM is?
The graph does have some issues- among other things, I don't believe Barnes makes a 127 6mm