good to see someone buys into marketing schemes about what makes a pistol safe.
Agreed. Any gun is only as safe as the person controlling it.
lol Yeah but most ADs happen because somebody is Handling a loaded fire-arm without either know how, or the fact that they have a round chambered... so a Backstrap safety goes out the window anyways... and is not much better than the 'trigger safety' the glockes have
Luke
I do like the loaded chamber indicator though.
My experience [plenty] with the 40 has been mixed. A light frame, say polymer or aluminum has a nice light weight but with full power loads, the 40 can be difficult to control. And since the standard 40 load uses the 180 grain bullet, there is little advantage over the 45acp, whose bullet is only 20 grains more.
Accuracy with the 40 has not reached the same levels as 45acp or 9mm in my opinion. Most serious PPC shooters don't use 40, but 9mm instead. After many years and different guns in 40, I finally took some good advice and went from 40 down to 9mm.
.40 is as good a caliber as any, in my opinion. Sure, in a light weight polymer gun like Glock 22, it will have a fair amount of snap, but that's to be expected. Besides, you don't have to go the polymer route if you're concerned about recoil. There are a number of all-steel guns that are available in .40, such as Browning Hi-Power, 1911, Sig P226 ST, CZ-75, etc.Thats very interesting. I generally shoot 9mm, but thought I'd give 40 a try. Anyone else want to comment on hatman1793's thoughts?
Thats very interesting. I generally shoot 9mm, but thought I'd give 40 a try. Anyone else want to comment on hatman1793's thoughts?



























