Semi-auto shotgun durability/reliability

Looking “ mighty fine “ and performing in a competition where every shot counts and malfunctions will end your day you won’t see many 1100’s around today. Much better semis out there.

I agree. My Beretta 391 has been a lot more reliable than the 1100s that I used to own. But the Remington 1100 is an easy fix in most cases. When I shot one I carried various spare parts and knew how to replace them.
 
I have a Beretta A400 Xplor Unico and it has NEVER failed in any way, other than missing many clays. It will reliably feed even the lightest and cheapest target loads. I probably have 2000+ rounds through it.
 
I have a Beretta A400 Xplor Unico and it has NEVER failed in any way, other than missing many clays. It will reliably feed even the lightest and cheapest target loads. I probably have 2000+ rounds through it.

They all fail eventually. My 390 started to have problems around 50,000 and I have replaced pretty much every part in the receiver since. Close to 100,000 now but has run with zero issues for a few thousand this year. So far.
 
A very-very good shotgun! Two friends have it, absolutely love it, I was amazed with the gun's fit and finish.

I was in the same boat as the OP, got the semi urge after using my BPS for years. Ended up getting the Franchi Affinity and never regretted it, it's a Benelli with a cheap pricetag. Has always gone BOOM when I needed it and the stock it fully adjustable.

+1 for the Franchi, I am loving it, like you said Benelli stamped on the side and 1k cheaper.
 
They all fail eventually. My 390 started to have problems around 50,000 and I have replaced pretty much every part in the receiver since. Close to 100,000 now but has run with zero issues for a few thousand this year. So far.

Wow, that's a whole lot of lead down range... These days, when I go through a flat (or two) spread across a few SG... it's been a good year!
 
Looking “ mighty fine “ and performing in a competition where every shot counts and malfunctions will end your day you won’t see many 1100’s around today. Much better semis out there.

Where does the OP suggest he is going to be a competition shooter ?
If Skeet or Sporting Clay's was the game I woulda suggested a Browning 725....
But, to each their own.
Rob
 
Where does the OP suggest he is going to be a competition shooter ?
If Skeet or Sporting Clay's was the game I woulda suggested a Browning 725....
But, to each their own.
Rob

My statement, no reference to the OP.

I’ve sold off my 1100’s long ago as the guns are prone to letting you down in the field or sporting. As I’ve said, dated design and much better semis out there.
 
My statement, no reference to the OP.

I’ve sold off my 1100’s long ago as the guns are prone to letting you down in the field or sporting. As I’ve said, dated design and much better semis out there.

Agreed. I sold all mine in the late 80's and never looked back. Too many breakdowns both on the range and in the field. We have a gent that still shoots 1100's for trap and when new shooters ask him what to buy it's always nothing but an 1100. I tell them to watch him shoot his. He cannot go a single day without a failure of some kind. When they see him constantly going back and forth to his truck to fix or replace the gun(he has 6 and always carries at least two or three to every shoot) or pulling it apart on the pad between taking his turn to swap a spare part (his pockets are full of parts) they catch on pretty quick. Even Leo Harrison III who was a world champion trapshooter eventually dumped his 1100's. When you saw him walking the line at a shoot he had an 1100 in one hand and a tool box in the other with every available part in it. He carried that tool box up to the shoot-off stands the night we shot off tied at the Grand American. I never have had to carry a part with me since dropping those 1100's in favour of more reliable modern designs.
 
They all fail eventually. My 390 started to have problems around 50,000 and I have replaced pretty much every part in the receiver since. Close to 100,000 now but has run with zero issues for a few thousand this year. So far.

My 391 started to act up around the same round count. An action spring replacement returned it to 100% performance. Around 60k I had to replace a broken connecting rod. Everything else in the gun is original.
 
My 391 started to act up around the same round count. An action spring replacement returned it to 100% performance. Around 60k I had to replace a broken connecting rod. Everything else in the gun is original.

I replaced the spring every 10,000. It always cycled fine. Just broke parts. I am on my third connecting rod. Split the bolt and broke the slide, lots of hammer braces, every spring in the gun, ejector and shell lifter. As I mentioned running really well at the moment.
 
Back
Top Bottom