Team Hipwell Scores a WIN. - Ed Burlew

Posted in other forum, sharing here!

Team Hipwell Scores a WIN. Landmark Decision by Federal Court.

In a landmark ruling released today Associate Chief Justice Gagne agreed with Team Hipwell that the Evidentiary Record before Cabinet that was used in deciding to enact the OIC 2020-298 ( regulation SOR/2020-96) be submitted to the Court for review. The Court closely followed the argument of Ed Burlew LL.B. and that of the other Applicants in deciding to review the Evidentiary Record before Cabinet.

A link to the decision and to the argument of Team Hipwell will be posted soon.

Your donations are being put to good work. Please renew your contributions so we may win this case.


DONATE RIGHT HERE TO TEAM HIPWELL

3SfgAiB.png
 
Can you explain what are the implications of this ruling? I kind of get it but I’d like short explanation in layman’s term.

The government has 30 days to show the court what they have with regards to the secret reasons they banned all of these firearms (and websites......) this last part was sarcasm
 
Last edited:
Does this mean the public gets to see the evidentiary record, or just in court?

The government has 30 days to show the court what they have with regards to the secret reasons they banned all of these firearms (and websites......)

Isn't the brand name of the receiver "ar15.com"? I thought it was a mistake on our part for thinking they banned a website.
 
The government has 30 days to show the court what they have with regards to the secret reasons they banned all of these firearms (and websites......) this last part was sarcasm

I still don't get it. So what? What if they don't have anything? What if they do? Do we honestly think this thing is going to be turned around based on what the government can or can't show us? Serious question. Will anything come of this or is it basically posturing on our behalf?
 
I still don't get it. So what? What if they don't have anything? What if they do? Do we honestly think this thing is going to be turned around based on what the government can or can't show us? Serious question. Will anything come of this or is it basically posturing on our behalf?

An excellent question to say the least...
 
Good news, but it's been 13 months and this is where we are. Keep in mind the amnesty ends in 11 months, and this doesn't tip the scales in our favour.
 
The government has 30 days to show the court what they have with regards to the secret reasons they banned all of these firearms (and websites......) this last part was sarcasm

Wow, that’s a pretty significant win!!! If their is proof that there is no proof, the conservatives are gonna have a field day with that during the next election!!’
 
I still don't get it. So what? What if they don't have anything? What if they do? Do we honestly think this thing is going to be turned around based on what the government can or can't show us? Serious question. Will anything come of this or is it basically posturing on our behalf?

The government will have to present the evidentiary record that resulted in them concluding that these rifles were not suitable for hunting or sporting purposes. Given that the AR-15 is the most prolific sport shooting rifle in existence by a massive margin, and countless testimonies and affidavits will confirm this, the "evidence" that they present will almost certainly be proven to be insufficient. That is why this is a big win.
 
Back
Top Bottom