I have been interested in cowboy guns for quite a long time and have a love for lever actions. I bought a 44 mag Marlin 1894 a few years ago and it was a nightmare. It had crooked sights. Sent it off for a warranty claim and the new rifle they sent also had crooked sights. I ended up getting something else for the warranty center.
So this whole process kind of put me off from the Marlins. So I've been looking at other options chambered in 357/38 so I can shoot more. I also wont be competing anytime soon, it would be more for just my amusement for now. Maybe one day.
My two main interests are the Uberti 1866 and the Chiappa 1892. I absolutely love the 1866 look, its a beautiful firearm. The thing that Im not crazy about is that its only 38, so im a little more limited on ammo. I dont reload at the moment, will one day, but for now Im going to stick to factory loads. I know the 1866 can be faster than the 1892. That being said, from my research, the 1892 is a much stronger action. So my question is, which would I be better off with? I like the 1866, but the 1892 is more affordable for me.
Also, Im a fan of the look of the octagonal barrels. I was wondering how much this would change the balance of the rifle. Would this make the rifle more front heavy and harder to handle?
Thanks in advance for the advice!
So this whole process kind of put me off from the Marlins. So I've been looking at other options chambered in 357/38 so I can shoot more. I also wont be competing anytime soon, it would be more for just my amusement for now. Maybe one day.
My two main interests are the Uberti 1866 and the Chiappa 1892. I absolutely love the 1866 look, its a beautiful firearm. The thing that Im not crazy about is that its only 38, so im a little more limited on ammo. I dont reload at the moment, will one day, but for now Im going to stick to factory loads. I know the 1866 can be faster than the 1892. That being said, from my research, the 1892 is a much stronger action. So my question is, which would I be better off with? I like the 1866, but the 1892 is more affordable for me.
Also, Im a fan of the look of the octagonal barrels. I was wondering how much this would change the balance of the rifle. Would this make the rifle more front heavy and harder to handle?
Thanks in advance for the advice!




















































