Liberals invoke S.39, refuse to provide evidence

Riflechair said:
Not a word from the Conservatives
Click to expand...

Because they are trying to out woke the liberals, and are probably the weakest theyve ever been. Unfortunately theyre going to be decimated should our tyrannical govt ever allow elections again. But maybe after another crippling defeat theyll finally realize most working class canadians want actual an conservative option not generic liberal lite.
 
StoneHorse said:
Bill C-10 passed during the night. Open and transparent government...:bsFlag:
Click to expand...

C-10, a big, controversial Bill, held up by the Senate (that newsworthy in itself), with secret amendments and rulings against it by the Speaker, yet over at the CBC it isn't worth a single mention. Not a big deal to them, or more likely it is a big deal and they are suppressing it because the whole thing stinks and shows the Liberals for what they really are.
 
Rotten to the bone.

This has to stop.

Hope everybody vote against libs once and forever.

Thanks again to CCFR for they non stop watch.

BB


BB
 
bogusiii said:
C-10, a big, controversial Bill, held up by the Senate (that newsworthy in itself), with secret amendments and rulings against it by the Speaker, yet over at the CBC it isn't worth a single mention. Not a big deal to them, or more likely it is a big deal and they are suppressing it because the whole thing stinks and shows the Liberals for what they really are.
Click to expand...

Yep. Being suppressed.
 
apexanimal said:
Because they are trying to out woke the liberals, and are probably the weakest theyve ever been. Unfortunately theyre going to be decimated should our tyrannical govt ever allow elections again. But maybe after another crippling defeat theyll finally realize most working class canadians want actual an conservative option not generic liberal lite.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I believe you are correct. Appealing to their base should be a priority. Red Tory leadership and isolating social conservatives isn't going to help their cause.
 
Boom-Boom said:
Rotten to the bone.

This has to stop.

Hope everybody vote against libs once and forever.

Thanks again to CCFR for they non stop watch.

BB


BB
Click to expand...

...but, honest question...vote for who instead? I fear that we'll be sorely disappointed by the "we'll repeal this, we'll repeal that, if we get elected" platform.

Action on day 1 sure wasn't what we got with the last CPC majority.
 
DarkSyd said:
...but, honest question...vote for who instead? I fear that we'll be sorely disappointed by the "we'll repeal this, we'll repeal that, if we get elected" platform.

Action on day 1 sure wasn't what we got with the last CPC majority.
Click to expand...

I don't get your point. The Cons are the ONLY party that will either support, or be the least detrimental to our sports and hobbies.

You can vote for whoever you want, but if you care about your ability to hunt, sport shoot, and collect, and that is important to you, that should sway you to vote Cons.
 
rentedzone said:
I don't get your point. The Cons are the ONLY party that will either support, or be the least detrimental to our sports and hobbies.

You can vote for whoever you want, but if you care about your ability to hunt, sport shoot, and collect, and that is important to you, that should sway you to vote Cons.
Click to expand...

Right now it seems the only thing close to a conservative party is Maxime Bernier's People's Party, which results in vote-splitting like happened back in the Reform Party days. The Cons finally figured that out and worked together, joining forces. Unfortunately they've once again lost their way.
 
With regard to the Liberals winning a majority, if they do they will double down on their left woke mega spending control censor and dependency on Liberal handouts schtick. It will be difficult to impossible to recover from, and I only hope those voters who enable this discover the 'uge 'UGE mistake they made.

If Canada Day, our founding father, all Canadian culture that existed before 2015 and everyone who succeeds (therefor an oppressor and deserves to be shat upon) will be cancelled by this lot, I don't think a few gun owners will be spared.
 
rentedzone said:
I don't get your point. The Cons are the ONLY party that will either support, or be the least detrimental to our sports and hobbies.

You can vote for whoever you want, but if you care about your ability to hunt, sport shoot, and collect, and that is important to you, that should sway you to vote Cons.
Click to expand...

Being a single issue voter is just being willfully ignorant and short sighted.

When your house is on fire, do you save your family, or your guns? You don't get both. A lot more pressing issues than firearms in our country. But then again, a lot of folks in this community/hobby use words they don't understand, such as dictatorship or communism.
 
Vewdu said:
Being a single issue voter is just being willfully ignorant and short sighted.

When your house is on fire, do you save your family, or your guns? You don't get both. A lot more pressing issues than firearms in our country. But then again, a lot of folks in this community/hobby use words they don't understand, such as dictatorship or communism.
Click to expand...

Comparing your rights to a house being on fire is hilarious, because you yourself have unwittingly compared the government to a force of pure destruction that operates
without logic or reason. I agree with you, the government needs to be strictly limited, decreased in size and strength, and kept under constant control.
 
IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED IT BY NOW,WE LIVE IN A COMMUNIST COUNTRY!!!Hail to the USA!!!! Nobody punishes these dicks politicians here, we are too weak. Get the grip people for F sake!
 
Vewdu said:
But then again, a lot of folks in this community/hobby use words they don't understand, such as dictatorship or communism.
Click to expand...

What do you call a government that does what it wants in secret, pushing the boundaries of legal and neutering any oversight?

And buddy, I ain't a single issue voter. I'm unhappy with a great deal of what Trudeau's unelected back room fellas are up too. Say, what's your definition of un-elected back room fella's running things?

Also looking for some advice, where should I place my vote in today's environment if I want to be a multi issue voter?
 
CPC needs to focus on winning seats in Ontario and Quebec, and Maverick should be supported in the west as a voice that represents western interests. It's the only way we will see positive change moving forward.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom