What I am saying is that I am seeing *more* bang flops, (or very short runs) at least in the few examples I've seen.None of these were neck shots.
Hits to (and through) the body did tremendous damage, destroying vitals and killing very quickly.![]()
I understand what you are saying
As well as fewer bang flops, the bullets do not seem to penetrate any better than the PT/AB's either. Percentage wise I am retaining as many of the tsx's as I did with the noslers. They do seem to retain a bit more weight though.
IMO the BC's on them suck. The .284 140 tsx goes .394 while the nosler AB in the same caliber & weight goes .485. I am hoping barnes new plastic tip version of the tsx improves this.
As a picky reloader I also do not like the bullet weight variation. Hardley any are right on the money and the range seems to be plus/minus .5 of a grain. If you measure them the same can be said for length. Try the same thing with a box of AB's and you will be amazed how much more consistant they are. once again I am hoping barnes new plastic tip version of the tsx improves this.
There is no doubt that they are good bullets but they are not the be all end all and I would not for a second feel disadvantaged with a nosler or hornady in the pipe instead (PT/AB or Interbond that is). I agree it's not about the money but why pay more for marginally better but mostly equal and sometimes less performance.
Last edited:





















































