If you have experience of H&R's Ultra single shot, especially if you also have experience of N.E.F. Handi-Rifles, I'd like to hear your opinion on whether the Ultras tend to shoot markedly better than Handi-Rifles or justify the extra cost in some other way.
I've got a Handi-Rifle in .223 and I like it a lot. I know some people report certain faults with these but mine's a good one and I like the simplicity of the single shot. So I am thinking about getting one in .308 for deer hunting.
Personally, I don't like the wood stocks on Handi-Rifles and that's what they put on the .308 (my .223 is a synthetic and I really like it) but I'm not keen on the laminate stock on the Ultra, so it would come down to differences in performance and price.
I've got a Handi-Rifle in .223 and I like it a lot. I know some people report certain faults with these but mine's a good one and I like the simplicity of the single shot. So I am thinking about getting one in .308 for deer hunting.
Personally, I don't like the wood stocks on Handi-Rifles and that's what they put on the .308 (my .223 is a synthetic and I really like it) but I'm not keen on the laminate stock on the Ultra, so it would come down to differences in performance and price.




















































