Lever Gun Practical Accuracy for Hunting

Devlin

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
130   0   0
Location
Behind You
Morning Gang,

I've picked up several really sweet lever guns and a reproduction Sharps from Pedersoli recently. The guns specifically are as follows:

- Pedersoli 1886 by Taylor & CO in 45-70 - https://taylorsfirearms.com/long-guns/cartridge-rifles/1886-lever-action-rifle.html
- Pedersoli Sharps Buffalo in 45-70 with Vernier Sight - https://www.davide-pedersoli.com/en/product/1874-sharps-buffalo-30
- Winchester 94 Deluxe Short Rifle in 30-30 - https://www.winchesterguns.com/products/rifles/model-94/current/model-1894-deluxe-short-rifle.html

I've had the notion to hunt with these rifles and may have gotten too caught up in the nostalgic side of the appeal of these rifles and neglected the practical side of their limitations in hunting situations. I also enjoy shooting them at the range and have spent some time building up "mouse fart" loads for the sharps and the 1886 tossing 405 grain lead projectiles at low velocity so you can plink all day with these and not get beat up by them.

The stories of the model 94 30-30 taking more deer than anything else under the sun are legendary, I can't shoot buckhorn sights well at all so opted to put a peep sight (Williams Foolproof) on the rifle for easy adjustments and a better sighting setup. I have good eyesight, better than 20/20 vision uncorrected I'm 47 yrs old so consider that a blessing for sure. Similar to most others I get a couple of weeks off a year and spend some of that time typically on hunting ventures, I live in southwest Ontario so calibre restrictions and land access are real issues here, most of my hunting is with friends in Northern Ontario where those problems of calibre and access go away for the most part.

Now with all that context out of the way getting to my question, is what to expect for practical accuracy especially out of the 1894 in 30-30 as this is the most hunter friendly gun of the 3 from a carrying perspective in the field and versatility point of view. I'm able to keep a roughly 6 inch group with the gun at a 100 yards with regular Winchester 150 grain whitebox crappy ammo, when shooting rested off a bench. Should I expect better performance, does the target being used play into this much I've tried a variety of targets to see if I can get better results and so far this has been the best result around a 6 inch group. The front sight is the standard gold bead that comes with the rifle, a few folks have suggested switching out to a fibre optic to see if that improves things, even going to a bigger dot that is easier to acquire and maintain sight picture with. I don't want to scope the rifle even though there are options to do so that are period correct and wouldn't look awful, but then the nostalgia engine kicks and I want to keep the gun as close to original as possible.

Of the 3 rifles the 1894 is the one I would keep if I could only have one, and to that end I am pondering selling off the other two (Sharps and the 1886) on the EE in support of a nice bolt action scope combo to compliment the 30-30 for longer range hunting when the situation requires it, shots down a powerline or across a wide clearing etc...that are outside of the 30-30's capability and mine as an iron sight shooter with that gun. My hesitation is the potential sellers remorse of then not having those for range time plinking, which I get a lot more time to do than actual hunting I live 13 minutes from our range and it goes out to 300 yards which for this part of Ontario is above average.

Welcome your thoughts and opinions on the matter as always.
 
The Model 94 will work fine for shots in the 100 yard range.For myself I prefer the 170 grain bullet to the 150,but to each his own.Have never used a Pedersoli Model 1886 in 45-70,but have bagged deer using an original Winchester Model 1996 in 45-70.No problems in the 100 yard range.Of the two ,the Model 94 is the lighter to carry.Of course if you just sit in a blind,that would make no difference.:)

If it were myself.I would sell the Sharps Pedersoli and keep the Model 1886.Again that's just me,to each his own.:)
 
I have had several winchester 94's and the worst one of them all grouped less than 4" at 100 yards. The best ones were around 2 3/4", and yes these were with iron sights. As mentioned above, try 170 grain bullets. These are what the 30-30 was designed to use.
 
I have had several winchester 94's and the worst one of them all grouped less than 4" at 100 yards. The best ones were around 2 3/4", and yes these were with iron sights. As mentioned above, try 170 grain bullets. These are what the 30-30 was designed to use.

In theory, the 150 grain should be a better choice, a bit faster and still fairly heavy. In practice, the 170 may be the better hunting bullet, and just about any brand of them will shoot to the same point.

However, if you are after just whitetail, the 125 grain does a good job. Federal makes a good 125 gr loading and I've handloaded the 125 Sierra. Recoil is lower, which is nice in a light rifle, and it smacks with authority. Warning, you will not eat right up to the bullet hole, it produces hydrostatic shock. My hunting buddy used it on fork and spike horn eater deer without any issues.

This is what Nathan Foster has to say about it: ( https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/.30-30+Winchester++.30+WCF.html )

"Federal offer a variety of loads for .30-30 users. Federal’s lightest load features a 125gr flat nose hollow point bullet at an advertised 2570fps for realistic velocities of around 2400fps. This load does its best work on game 20kg (44lb) and under. Although a high velocity 125 grain bullet may seem a good means of increasing shocking power to the .30-30 for use on deer, results tend to be poor with slow kills on larger animals."

My hunting partner shot from a blind, range was short and most of the deer did not run. In his opinion, it was a way better harvester than a 243.

Lever guns can be surprisingly accurate. I have a 1895 Winchester in 30-06 that is an accurate shooter, but my 1895 75th Anniversary Savage in 308 will beat it with sub MOA 3 shot groups. Both have receiver sights. My 94's were never quite that accurate, but I've seen some that would shoot very well. IMHO, anytime you have cartridges in the tube magazine, it has some affect on the POI. I also have a 336 Marlin in 35 Rem, nothing wrong with how that one shoots either.

I test at 50 yards with open sights, for me, that is where everything looks in focus. At 100 things get blurry and the groups open up. Also the concentration required at longer ranges is OK for a hunting shot, but if your testing ammo, part way through the second box of ammo, the fun is gone out of the test. Practice shooting off hand, that is where good marksmanship comes in handy. Also, you may find that the sights may have to go up or down a notch as compared to shooting off a rest.

Nostalgia is fun, but you really should have one more modern hunting rifle. Something in the 30-06 class of calibers. My 30-06, a Sauer 80 bolt, was my go to when I was still hunting. Plain vanilla boring, but works well.

I like to shoot Cowboy action, so you know what era my nostalgia clock is stuck at. I just bought an Uberti 1873 in 44-40. it will join my 45 Colt and 38/357 rifles. Depending on my mood, I shoot different combos, maximize that nostalgia experience.

Nitro, aka "Big Boston" when I go old west.
 
My model 64 Deluxe Carbine shoots under 3" at 100yds from a bench rest using Winchester Super X 170gr SP with iron sights and around 4"-5" off-hand is about my ability. My Grandfather had a side mount fixed 4X weaver on the rifle that the mount attached via the factory tapped holes in the receiver for an optional peep sight and with that old scope I can group around 2" off a solid rest. I removed the scope and put the factory screw hole screws back in as I don't like the way a side mount scope pulls your cheek off the stock to see through it. Plain and simple in my opinion a 30-30 is a 100yd rifle and I can see and shoot irons plenty well to kill an animal out to 100yds with the semi-buckhorn irons. Like you I wasn't able to source any 170gr lately and bought a few boxes at a shop that was closing of Federal blue box and Hornady American Whitetail in 150gr just to ensure I have some ammo. I have yet to try the 150's to see how they perform.
 
One of the most accurate hunting rifles I ever owned was the 1895 Marlin I bought in 1973. I was able to shoot groups under one inch at 100 yards, regularly. A Model 94 Carbine, with Redfield peep sight, wasn't as good but I could usually stay inside 2 inches.
 
Actually went and measured my groups with the 30-30 and I am under 4 inches at 100 yards....I was eyeballing it previously (guess that whole guys overestimating what 6 inches looks like is really true) so don't feel so bad about the group size now ;-)
 
Year 2005 on 22 November took a big Buck at 260 paces
a single 150 grain factory Winchester Silvertip from a M94 Winchester carbine circa 1956.
Williams FP rear peep and Firesite bead up front as I find it about one third smaller than the factory bead.
Shot steel gongs eventually offhand the prior summer.
Held white throat patch virtually no wind of any kind I could not even feel it on my cheek.
14-16 inches drop this distance I knew to be well inside the boiler room. No tracking. It fell at the shot. Never got up again. Struck it two inches left of centre of chest.
My zero was plus three inches high at 100.
 
I have two Uberti 1873 rifles , one in 45 colt and one in 357mag , both are deadly accurate , even the 45 colt will hold a 2 inch group at 100 yards. The 357mag is sub 2 inch at 100 yards with Federal Hammerdown ammo.
The rifles you’ve listed that you currently have are not cheap by any means so I’m going to assume you have some disposable cash to work with. If there’s one of those that you’d sell and not regret and are wanting to use a cowboy style rifle in 30-30 then I would suggest selling it and grabbing the Taylor’s & Co Uberti 1894 30-30 that prophet river has in stock currently (as of this comment they have two listed ). I have had impeccable accuracy from my 2 Uberti rifles and would recommend trying one of those if you are able to.
Just something to consider , personally I’ve hunted with 45-70 and I find it to be overkill for deer. Much more comfortable and cheaper to shoot 30-30. Just one mans opinion, and we all know what they say about opinions lol
 
Of the 3 rifles the 1894 is the one I would keep if I could only have one, and to that end I am pondering selling off the other two (Sharps and the 1886) on the EE in support of a nice bolt action scope combo to compliment the 30-30 for longer range hunting when the situation requires it, shots down a powerline or across a wide clearing etc...that are outside of the 30-30's capability and mine as an iron sight shooter with that gun.
Deciding to sell a rifle is a skill I have never developed; I'm a complete failure at it. So, thinking of my overfilled gun safes, I appreciate your pain.

My one and only lever action is my grandfather's 1895 in 30 U.S. I don't know how my grandfather could see the sights to hunt with it in his 50's, but he's been gone now for 50 years, so I'll never know. I couldn't see those razor blade thin front sight and notch in the rear buckhorn, so I installed the no-drill replica Lyman rear aperture sight and had a front blade about the size of that on a No. 4 Mk1 replace it (all original parts carefully retained). Night and day difference. Easy 200 yard hunting accuracy. With that in mind, your Model 94 (or any other lever action with open sights) can have it's legs extended by installation of a very traditional and period correct rear aperture sight if you want to retain the classic look.

Having a scoped rifle to give you a bit more range at times makes sense. If you like the looks of traditional, there are rifles like Browning's Model B78 (or whatever) falling block replica that are ready for a scope and still look just fine with one mounted. One of my sheep hunting partners has been doing all his sheep hunting for the last 40 years with one chambered in .270 Winchester. It is what people call "a tack driver". I enjoy shooting it when we are out shooting at the far away hanging plates so much that I am continually tempted to find one to buy for myself, except in 30/06 due to the wide range of bullets available.

I think it's familiarity to the rifles you are considering selling would appeal to you, if nothing else. And - oh look, how timely! Rifle Magazine has an article on this rifle in this month's issue!

https://www.riflemagazine.com/browning-and-winchester-s-famous-model-1885-single-shot-rifle-from-past-to-present
 
I have a Winchester M94 Reproduction chambered 38-55. It sports Williams FP sights [aperture]
and on any decent day groups 1¼" or better with the 255 grain Barnes original at c.1750 fps.

My 336A Marlin has a 4x scope on it, and will shoot under moa with the 170 Speer FNSP and
Leverevolution. Very close are the 160 Flextip and the 150 Silvertip [old style].
I prefer the 170's for hunting, personally. Dave
 
The 4x scopes you folks are referencing any suggestions for a model to look at for the Win 94? A google search turned up Hi Lux at Wolverine but I have no idea whether they are a good option or not?

Thanks for all the advice so far guys really appreciate it.
 
The 4x scopes you folks are referencing any suggestions for a model to look at for the Win 94? A google search turned up Hi Lux at Wolverine but I have no idea whether they are a good option or not?

Thanks for all the advice so far guys really appreciate it.

The scope I used on my Mossy 464 was a Nikko Sterling Gold Crown 4x32 unit. Very clear optic that they don't offer nowadays.
 
The 4x scopes you folks are referencing any suggestions for a model to look at for the Win 94? A google search turned up Hi Lux at Wolverine but I have no idea whether they are a good option or not?

Thanks for all the advice so far guys really appreciate it.

When I scoped my ‘94 (since removed) I used a no drill mount which required a scout scope. I chose a Leupold but there are others. Fixed 2.3 I think.
Worked good, looked different which is why I tried a receiver mounted peep sight (my eyes still suck though…).
 
Back
Top Bottom