I'm surprised that you of all people would would make that argument.
I whole heartedly disagree.
I have watched supersonic bullets fly straight, then start daring about after about 75 yards. Shoots fine at 50, then goes to hell farther out. I have no reason to accept that its just badly made. Equally badly made cheap ammo does not suffer from the same characteristics. Sure crap accuracy and wide velocity spreads, but more linear results at increased distances.
You may be surprised simply because of a lack of information and perhaps because your eyes may not be seeing what you think they're seeing.
First, commonly used 40 and 30 grain 22 WMR rounds have MVs from between about 1875 and 2200 fps and the bullets maintain supersonic (greater than the speed of sound) velocities out to 150 yards and more. The transonic zone is from about 890 fps to about 1340 fps. The 22 WMR bullets in flight don't slow down
into the transonic zone until they've gone past 100 yards. As a result,
if transonic turbulence was responsible for 22 WMR accuracy shortcomings, it wouldn't be a factor until
after the round is beyond 100 yards.
Second, with regard to the bullet behaviour you say you see, it seems impossible for anyone with the naked eye or with a rifle scope to watch or follow an 1800 fps or more bullet in flight and determine that they "fly straight, then start dar[t]ing about after about 75 yards."
Regardless whether you're aware of it or not, the fact remains that 22 WMR ammunition is not made to the specifications required for excellent accuracy. This is the primary cause of the relative inaccuracy of the average 22 WMR round compared to quality 22 LR match ammo. The 22 WMR ammo is designed as a hunting and plinking round and so too is 17 HMR and 22 LR high velocity ammo. They are not made to be especially accurate.