Clearly there is enough stupid people in this country who will be more than willing to vote for him again. The majority are in Ontario and Quebec. Until that issue gets rectified, nothing is gonna change.
Polys Targeting PCCs
- Thread starter thegazelle
- Start date
Clearly there is enough stupid people in this country who will be more than willing to vote for him again. The majority are in Ontario and Quebec. Until that issue gets rectified, nothing is gonna change.
I wonder where it'll end for them. Let's picture a canada where all guns and anything resembling a gun is prohib. No supersoakers, no cap guns, no caulking guns, no pressure washers, no hand drills, no glue guns, nothing. What would the Poly group go after then?
Poly and the Karens do not realize that even if every legal firearm in Canada vanished today it would make NO difference in criminal activity. Criminals do not obey the law so the laws apparently do not apply to them. The guns would continue to come from the US through various routes.
You will never hear factual information from Poly. We all know where the crime guns are coming from but that means the Govt would actually have to do something about it. We as gun owners are the path of least resistance for them. It makes Poly and Karen happy.
The Liberals have removed the mandatory minimum sentences on violent crimes as they felt it contributed to a system that disproportionately punishes the racially marginalized segment of our population.
We have tough laws that carry lengthy sentences but they are very rarely enforced. Our bail reform act is a joke. Get arrested with a prohibited firearm with prior violent offence(s), guess what you are back out on the streets within 48 hours.
If any criminal does "dead time" in jail prior to being convicted, they will get at a minimum of 2 to 1 times served during sentencing. I have seen it go as high as 4 to 1. What this means is if a suspect is arrested for "whatever crime" and is found guilty and sentenced to 2 years and they served 6 months of pre-trial custody, they will get at a minimum 1 year reduction off their sentence.
Could you imagine if they sentenced gun smugglers or people who use a firearm in the commission of an offence based on 1 gun equals 1 year. 5 guns equal 5 years etc. And you must serve your entire sentence.
Here is a cut and paste from the Govt of Canadas website: By law, federal offenders are normally eligible for full parole after serving one-third of their sentence, or seven years, whichever is less.
Sorry my rant is over.
You hit the nail on the head. That is their core motivation. Traditional masculinity and any tenet of it has been under attack for years. Even chivalrous actions such as holding a door open for a woman is viewed with contempt (I have had this experience at the mall years ago - held a door open for this lady and she started telling me it is ###ist, she can open her own door and I probably believe women should not be in the workforce, etc.). My poor kids were standing there watching all this and my oldest son says "that lady needs a boyfriend..."
Lots of excellent points in your post, Nitroxace, but I will focus on the one above, because for me, as a "person of colour", this one has the biggest implication on everything I stand against.
The entire system as it stands right now is geared towards abdicating personal responsibility out of a false sense that there is systemic racial injustice afoot and it permeates structures everywhere in society.
FALSE.
I can tell you vehemently that this is not the case. This is a manufactured and synthetically produced narrative to distract and shift the focus from certain communities which have a clear problem with personal responsibility, poor decision making, lack of educational focus, and a breakdown of family, specifically with absentee fathers and teenage mothers. The problem is that these issues are all now bundled under the guise of "poverty" (which absolutely is a prime consideration, but it cannot consistently be the crutch upon people rely).
We can see it not just in the justice system but in various segments in society. People seemingly are given a pass based on past injustices (which by the way I neither doubt nor deny - but how long are you going to be playing the victim card - ie like the Polys) - there comes a time where you realize it is 2021, and you can make good choices TODAY and stop blaming others.
The old adage applies - if you do the crime, you do the time. Lady Justice is blind, so it doesn't matter what your racial background or ethnic makeup is. Yet, we now have courts and lawyers who have been indoctrinated into this notion that yes, discrimination is not fair, but their practices clearly qualify this in indicating discrimination is bad one way but OK another. The fact that minimum sentences are eliminated is a travesty. Prison population is not a social experiment to ensure "diversity". If there are a great percentage of inmates that are of a particular racial or ethnic makeup, we should be asking why, and not starting at the end premise that there is discriminatory practices and then working backwards and but encountering and coming to terms with the fact that yes, there are higher representations of criminals from certain racial and ethnic groups. Why is that? That is important to determine in an objective manner. Does it mean everyone in that group are bad? Of course not - I have mentioned several exceptions in my past posts, who are personal friends of mine and have built great success stories and strong families - it came down to their rejecting the narrative that their "community" seems to have accepted. They rejected this, made positive choices in their lives and are now reaping the fruits and rewards. They would say EXACTLY the same thing I say - and they would get flak from others saying that making good choices and rejective the narrative are racist choices - it has truly become ridiculous how little society can properly process things in a logical manner.
As a visible minority guy, this bothers me greatly because oftentimes the public can lump all visible minorities together and think they are a monolithic voting bloc and share the same belief structure. For anyone who takes some time to have a look at things, you can see this is not the case. I have worked my whole life to counter this narrative. Each person should be judged on their merits based on their character and actions. Nothing more, nothing less.
Now back to the topic at hand - the Polys are a perfect example of embracing lifelong victimhood. They are truly no better than anyone else who plays the victim card. Lots of people have been dealt crappy hands - and lots of people just press on with their lives, not unhealthily living and become a slave to a dark past (which no one would deny). Just like others making excuses, the Polys have a outcome in mind - they just aren't sure how they got there, but heck - facts don't matter - they want to ban all guns despite counter evidence to the efficacy of such a decision - but they don't care - their outcome just be protected at all costs. They just need to know how to make the incompatible puzzle pieces fit so the puzzle looks like what they want. So rather than realize that their puzzle pieces don't this puzzle, they slowly start to cut the puzzle pieces, paint over them to try to make it match what they want it to be. If you have ever tried this, you will realize that the resulting puzzle looks like crap - like multiple Michael Jason surgical procedures - the result will not turn out to be what you think despite your constant cutting and shaping and colouring.
Midnight Rider
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- ......the Vanishing Point .
All guns will be banned , it has been part of the Liberal agenda for years . The only bright spot is that Harper did away with the LGR , and that set the Liberal gun grab back as they don't know where all those non restricted guns are , or who has them . If the Liberals did have a current LGR , the gun grab would be moving a lot quicker than it is now .
I got my shot, I take reasonable precautions but this quote is crazy.
"Since white-tailed deer are common in some urban parks, it is also recommended people wear a mask if they are near an animal."
FFS you are outside, if you are close enough to breathe in from an animal id be questioning what other issues it had.
Their goal is to ban civilian firearms ownership, period. They will lobby one bite-size category after the next until there is nothing left.
Once you accept this, you can take any 'logical' argument out of it. They don't respond to it or utilize it. You can claim moral superiority via facts and logic all you want, but when one side doesn't care about it in the slightest, it's a failing tactic.
I definitely see your point. Sometimes trying to reason someone who is devoid of reasoning faculties is a fool's errand. Guess I expect too much of people to think intelligently. Should probably lower my standards.
They’ll go after pump actions before bolts and levers…
That is an interesting perspective. The more I think about it, the more I think you may be right. There seems to be a certain tactical ###iness with pumps from the movies, as opposed to lever actions and bolt actions. People seem to always relate levers to old fashioned westerns and cowboy movies, though I have seen a couple of people operate levers with an insane amount of speed. But it seems like levers in particular don't quite jive with the socialist and left wing narrative about "assault style". For bolt actions, many non gun people seem to equate it with either hunting or sniper rifles. But yeah - pumps seem to be in line with the Polys philosophy to a degree.
Thanks for the kind words. I live (lived) in a Conservative riding under the past election when a Liberal got back in (he was a long-time police officer). It certainly would be fun to run as a candidate for my local riding. The good thing about politics, unlike most jobs..."no previous experience necessary".
